Skip to main content

Renegotiating Reflective and Ethical Practice in a Liquid Education System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers

Abstract

Skourdoumbis and Bennett draw attention to the constantly changing global environment in which education systems are embedded and to which they have been required to respond. Drawing on Zygmunt Bauman’s characterisation of the apparently ‘liquid’ economic, social and political environments that characterise late modernity in which it seems nothing is solid, irreplaceable, permanent or in a sense deeply trustworthy and dependable, they discuss the consequences for education. The global response has been widely described as a neo-liberal response with its characteristic demands for accountability, efficiency and compliance with standards monitored through management and policy strategies that require measurable outcomes. The consequences for teachers’ work in this environment of increasingly routine procedures and decreasing professional autonomy are deeply troubling. Teachers are increasingly drawn away from the personal, humane and community relations that they still know are the fundamental characteristics of their daily work and are confronted with ethical issues, if not crises, arising from the apparently contradictory discourses of audit, accountability and compliance that constrain them. The authors illustrate these moments of ethical confrontation with reference to typical challenges faced daily by teachers as they strive to retain a sense of authentic endeavour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    NAPLAN (The National Assessment Programme in Literacy and Numeracy is a standardised testing regime implemented by the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority—ACARA. Australian students in years 3, 5, 7 and 9 are expected to sit for the tests each May. Students are tested in literacy, numeracy and ICT literacy). The MySchool website is administered by ACARA and hosts a variety of information on Australian schools including NAPLAN results.

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, W. (1995). Becoming a teacher. In W. Ayers (Ed.), To become a teacher. Making a difference in children’s lives. NY and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, K., Kelchtermans, G., & Loughran, J. (2006). Beyond intensification towards a scholarship of practice: Analysing changes in teachers’ work lives. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltodano, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and the demise of public education: The corporatization of schools of education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(4), 487–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2009). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers?. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2015). Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry: Notes on the social psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education, 10(3), 348–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(1), 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. A. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2008). Engaging minds. Changing teaching in complex times. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ruyter, D. J., & Kole, J. J. (2010). Our teachers want to be the best: On the necessity of intra-professional reflection about moral ideals of teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903478474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds) (1998) The essential dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, education, democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience & education. NY: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, J. (2017). The state of public schooling. In T. Bentley & G. C. Savage (Eds.), Educating Australia. Challenges for the decade ahead (pp. 55–67). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2013). Breaking the silence. In R. Ryan-flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (2014). Encouraging imagination and creativity in the teaching profession. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Grootenboer, P. (2016). Cultivating community: Detailing school and community engagement under complex conditions. Teaching Education, 27(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2015.1034683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London, UK: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. W. (2015). The end of public schools. The corporate reform agenda to privatize education. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2008). High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, D., & Smith, W. (2012). Education and inequality: Implications of the world bank’s education strategy 2020. In Education strategy in the developing world: Revising the world bank’s education policy (pp. 173–202). Published online: 08 March 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martion, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2013). Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 557–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R., & Hempel-Jorgensen, A. (2012). The importance of teaching: Pedagogical constraints and possibilities in working-class schools. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univesity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2005). Guide for busy academics No. 4: Learning through reflection. Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, Michael A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J., & Bourke, R. (2010). Educating teachers about a code of ethical conduct. Ethics and Education, 5(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, G. B. (2015). Education as recovery: Neoliberalism, school reform, and the politics of crisis. Journal of Education Policy, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.904930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. C. (2014). The global transformation toward testing for accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(116). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22.1571.

  • Strathern, A. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Skourdoumbis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skourdoumbis, A., Bennett, S. (2019). Renegotiating Reflective and Ethical Practice in a Liquid Education System. In: Webster, R., Whelen, J. (eds) Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9400-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9401-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics