Skip to main content

A Self-tuning Controller Design Method Based on LQG/LTR and Back Propagation Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2019 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference (CISC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 593))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A self-tuning controller design method, based on the Back Propagation (BP) algorithm, was proposed to tune the LQG/LTR gain matrices directly without the need of selecting weighting matrices. The proposed controller design methodology is illustrated through the application to a turbo-shaft engine, and the simulation results demonstrate the improved design efficiency and the better controller performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yao H (2014) Full authority digital electronic control system for aero-engine. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fan S (2008) Aero-Engine control system. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pfeil WH, Athans M, Spang HA (1986) Multi-variable control of the GE T700 engine using the LQG/LTR design methodology. NASA Technical Report, NASA-CR-177080, NAS 1.26:177080, LIDS-P-1547

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moellenhoff DE, Rao SV, Skarvan CA (1991) Design of robust controllers for gas turbine engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 113(2):283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Athans M, Kapasouris P, Kappos E et al (1986) Linear-quadratic Gaussian with loop-transfer recovery methodology for the F-100 engine. J Guidance Control Dyn 9(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doyle J, Stein G (1979) Robustness with observers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 24(4):607–611

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang M, Sun P, Cao R et al (2010) LQG/LTR flight controller optimal design based on differential evolution algorithm. In: International conference on intelligent computation technology and automation, pp 613–616

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rongfu T, Weiming P, Juntian Z et al (2016) The LQG/LTR control optimization based on genetic algorithm for aeroengine. Comput Technol Autom 35(4):33–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das S, Pan I, Halder K et al (2013) LQR based improved discrete PID controller design via optimum selection of weighting matrices using fractional order integral performance index. Appl Math Model 37(6):4253–4268

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan I, Das S (2013) Design of hybrid regrouping PSO–GA based sub-optimal networked control system with random packet losses. Memetic Comput 5(2):141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haessig D (1995) Selection of LQG/LTR weighting matrices through constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, no 1. IEEE, pp 458–460

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma R, Wu HT, Ding L (2016) Optimal LQG/LTR controller for small-scale unmanned helicopter based on artificial bee colony algorithm. Control Decis 31(12):2248–2254

    Google Scholar 

  13. Das S, Halder K (2014) Missile attitude control via a hybrid LQG-LTR-LQI control scheme with optimum weight se-lection. In: International conference on automation, control, energy and systems. IEEE, pp 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jianqiao Y, Guanchen L, Yuesong MEI (2011) Surface-to-air missile autopilot design using LQG/LTR gain scheduling method. Chin J Aeronaut 24(3):279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yingqing G, Dan W, Huz Z (2002) Design of LQG/LTR multivariable feedback controller. Aeroengine 4:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kubat M (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, by Simon Haykin, Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-352781-7. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rumelhart DE, Hinton, GE (1986) Parallel distributed processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cong S, Liang Y (2009) PID-like neural network nonlinear adaptive control for uncertain multivariable motion control systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56(10):3872–3879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaw LC, Mattingly JD (2009) Aircraft engine controls: design, system analysis, and health monitoring. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiqiang Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, W., Hu, Z., Wang, J., Liu, S. (2020). A Self-tuning Controller Design Method Based on LQG/LTR and Back Propagation Algorithm. In: Jia, Y., Du, J., Zhang, W. (eds) Proceedings of 2019 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference. CISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 593. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9686-2_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics