Skip to main content

A Three-Level Intervention Pedagogy to Enhance the Academic Achievement of Indigenous Students: Evidence from QuickSmart

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students

Abstract

Indigenous students in the middle-school years experiencing difficulties in basic mathematics are a particularly vulnerable group. During these years gaps in performance between educationally disadvantaged students and their peers widen, potentially leading to ongoing economic and social disadvantage. This chapter reports on a teaching intervention referred to as QuickSmart, which has been particularly successful with Indigenous students who perform in the bottom 30 % of the achievement spectrum in Australia-wide tests. QuickSmart has been used in Australian schools since 2001. The pedagogical approach that underpins this numeracy program can be considered at three levels. The first is as an instructional program that withdraws pairs of students from their classroom instruction for three 30-min periods each week for a 30-week period. The second level constitutes pedagogical themes that are important within QuickSmart lessons. For example, the instruction offered in QuickSmart lessons builds on the pre-existing knowledge and understandings of students in order to encourage their self-belief through successful learning experiences and by focusing on what are considered foundational skills in mathematics. This approach is very suited to enhancing the learning of many Indigenous students. The third level of pedagogical emphasis relates to the benefits that flow from recruiting Indigenous teacher assistants as instructors and examining their involvement in the associated professional learning program. This chapter concludes with evidence drawn from the learning progress of Indigenous middle-school students who completed the QuickSmart numeracy program. These data show, based on effect-size statistics, cognitive growth for students of up to 2 years over the course of a 30-week program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACER. (2005). Progressive achievement tests in mathematics (PAT Maths, 3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education. ACER Research Monographs. http://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4

  • Al-Yaman, F., & Higgins, D. (2011). What works to overcome Indigenous disadvantage: Key learnings and gaps in the evidence (Produced for the closing the gap clearinghouse). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (ABS cat. No. 4704.0). Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 10, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellert, A. (2009). Narrowing the gap: A report on the QuickSmart mathematics intervention. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2010). Closing the gap prime minister’s report 2010. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National partnership agreement on closing the gap in Indigenous health outcomes. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2009). Indigenous reform agreement (Closing the gap). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshler, D., Mellard, D. F., Tollefson, J. M., & Byrd, S. E. (2005). Research topics in responsiveness to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 483–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes: systematic review of the literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 1228–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, P. J. (2001). Longitudinal case research: A critical perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efthymiades, D., Roberts, J., & Morony, W. (2000). Numeracy development of Indigenous students: An introduction to research. Paper presented at the ACER research conference (pp. 27–30), Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigo, T., Corrigan, M., Adams, I., Hughes, P., Stephens, M., & Woods, D. (2004). Supporting English literacy and numeracy learning for Indigenous students in the early years. (ACER Research Monograph No. 57). Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematical difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., Bellert, A. M., & Pegg, J. E. (2001, October). Enhancing the automaticity of basic academic skills for middle school students. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Australian Association of Special Education, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., Bellert, A., Thomas, J., & Pegg, J. (2007). A basic skills intervention for middle school students with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 410–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., Bellert, A., & Thomas, J. (2005). QuickSmart: Improving literacy for students with learning difficulties. In Multiliteracies and English teaching K-12 in the age of information and communication technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 1–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L., Pegg, J., & Alder, L. (2007). Enhancing secondary school students’ literacy performance through a basic skills intervention. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N. (2011). Teaching and learning in Aboriginal education (2nd ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC). (2011). Specifications for the collection of 2010 data. Research Funding and Policy Branch, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P., Cooke, S., Lowe, K., & Perry, B. (2011). Enhancing quality and equity in mathematics education for Australian indigenous students. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematic education (pp. 365–378). New York: Springer Science and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, M. A. (2003). Is schooling good for Aboriginal children’s health? Casuarina, NT: Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2001). Report of the MCEETYA taskforce on Indigenous education. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Summary report. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). (2008). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: Summary report. Canberra, Australia: MCEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, J., & Graham, L. (2007). Addressing the needs of low-achieving mathematics students: Helping students ‘Trust Their Heads’. Keynote. In K. Milton, H. Reeves, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, J. E., Graham, L. J., & Bellert, A. (2005). The effect of improved automaticity of basic number skills on persistently low-achieving pupils. Learners and learning environments, 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 4–49).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2007). Inequities in student achievement for literacy: Metropolitan versus rural comparisons. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30(3), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K., Stephanou, A., & Urbach, D. (2006). Effective teaching and learning practices initiative for students with learning difficulties. Report to the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharplin, E. (2006). Rural retreat or outback hell: Expectations of rural and remote teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 12(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Parise, L. M., & Sherer, J. Z. (2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: Policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strain, P. S., & Hoyson, M. (2000). The need for longitudinal intervention: Follow-up outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(2), 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. R., & Murphy, L. (2008). Report on the QuickSmart numeracy program for Indigenous students in the New England region. University of New England. Armidale: SiMERR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P., Partington, G., Gray, J., & Mack, L. (2006). Culture, communities and students. Perth, WA: Aboriginal Education and Training Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, P. (2007). What teachers need to know about numeracy. Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Pegg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pegg, J., Graham, L. (2013). A Three-Level Intervention Pedagogy to Enhance the Academic Achievement of Indigenous Students: Evidence from QuickSmart . In: Jorgensen, R., Sullivan, P., Grootenboer, P. (eds) Pedagogies to Enhance Learning for Indigenous Students. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-84-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics