Skip to main content

Protection of Biota and the Value of Marine Protected Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marine Hard Bottom Communities

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 206))

Abstract

Reserves are areas of marine habitat managed to prevent human interference (destruction of habitat, contamination, etc.). Disturbances may be long-term and sustained or shorter-term. Preventing these requires different management. Harvesting is usually easier to control than contamination. Pollution is often detected only after it has occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcala AC, Russ GR (1990) A direct test of the effects of protective management on abundance and yield of tropical marine resources. J Cons Int Explor Mer 46:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison GW, Lubchenco J, Carr MH (1998) Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecol Appl 8:S79–S92

    Google Scholar 

  • ANZECC (1999) Guidelines for establishing the national representative system of marine protected areas. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Task Force on Marine Protected Areas, Environment Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock RC, Kelly S, Shears NT, Walker JW, Willis TJ (1999) Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan GW, Langston WJ (1992) Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: a review. Environ Pollut 76:89–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carr MH, Neigel JE, Estes JA, Andelman S, Warner RR, Largier JL (2003) Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S90–S107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castilla JC (1999) Coastal marine communities: trends and perspectives from human-exclusion experiments. Trends Ecol Evol 14:280–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chape S, Blyth S, Fish L, Fox P, Spalding M (compilers) (2003) 2003 United Nations list of protected areas. IUCN, Gland; Cambridge and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Day JC, Roff JC (2000) Planning for representative marine protected areas: a framework for Canada’s oceans. World Wildlife Fund, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Day JC, Senior J, Monk S, Neal W (eds) (2007) Proceedings of the First International Marine Protected Areas Congress. IMPAC1 2005, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol Conserv 7:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DV, Pattisina LA (1990) Widespread neogastropod imposex—a biological indicator of global TBT contamination. Mar Pollut Bull 21:248–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1993) Links between ecology and ecophilosophy, ethics and the requirements of environmental management. Aust J Ecol 18:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank KT, Perry RI, Drinkwater KF (1990) Predicted response of northwest Atlantic fish stocks to CO2 induced climate change. Trans Am Fish Soc 119:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord B, Gaines SD, Siegel DA, Carr MH (2005) Marine reserves exploit population structure and life history in potentially improving fisheries yields. Ecol Appl 15:2180–2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM, Underwood AJ (1996) Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations. Environ Monit Assess 42:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray SJ (1997) Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodivers Conserv 6:153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, DeFries R (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol Appl 17:974–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1997) Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models. In: Hanksi I (ed) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 69–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins SJ, Proud SV, Spence SK, Southward AJ (1994) From the individual to the community and beyond: water quality, stress indicators and key species in coastal ecosystems. In: Sutcliffe DW (ed) Water quality and stress indicators in marine and freshwater ecosystems: linking levels of organisation (individuals, populations, communities). Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, pp 35–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly S, MacDiarmid AB (2003) Movement patterns of mature spiny lobsters, Jasus edwardsii, from a marine reserve. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 37:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997) Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: implications for reserve design. Biol Conserv 82:369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson E (1967) The equilibrium theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Allan JD, Butman CA (1996) Dispersal as a regional process affecting the local dynamics of marine and stream benthic invertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:322–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parks SA, Harcourt AH (2002) Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in US protected areas. Conserv Biol 16:800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins BD, Bell SS (1994) Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends Ecol Evol 9:301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CM, Branch G, Bustamante RH, Castilla JC, Dugan J, Halpern BS, Lafferty KD, Leslie H, Lubchenco J, McArdle D, Ruckelshaus M, Warner RR (2003) Application of ecological criteria in selecting marine reserves and developing reserve networks. Ecol Appl 13:S215–S228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiel DR (1982) Selective feeding by the echinoid, Evechinus chloroticus, and the removal of plants from subtidal algal stands in northern New Zealand. Oecologia 54:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto CG (2001) The potential impacts of global climate change on marine protected areas. Rev Fish Biol Fish 11:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan AL, Shaffer ML (1975) Biogeography of the megazoo. Science 189:13–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RC, Crowe TP, Hawkins SJ (2002) Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years. Environ Conserv 29:168–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1995) Ecological research and (and research into) environmental management. Ecol Appl 5:232–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1974) Final report. Task Force on Criteria and Guidelines for the Choice and Establishment of Biosphere Reserves, UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Huston MA, Grime JP, Berendse F, Garnier E, Lauenroth WK, Setala H, Wilson SD (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem function: an issue in ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis TJ, Millar RB, Babcock RC (2003) Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. J Appl Ecol 40:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this paper was supported by funds from the Australian Research Council through its Special Centres’ programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paris J. Goodsell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodsell, P.J., Underwood, A. (2009). Protection of Biota and the Value of Marine Protected Areas. In: Wahl, M. (eds) Marine Hard Bottom Communities. Ecological Studies, vol 206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b76710_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics