Skip to main content

Emancipatory Research as Empowerment: An Illustration from a Research Study of Persons with Disabilities in Palestine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation

Part of the book series: Rethinking International Development series ((RID))

Abstract

In this chapter, Biggeri and Ciani introduce emancipatory research as a participatory methodology that can produce relevant information for policy-making as well as for individual and social empowerment. The focus is on the research methodology itself, which promotes emancipation. This is illustrated through a case study that focuses on the capabilities of persons with disabilities in Palestine. The research in question was carried out by women with disabilities and members of disabled people’s organizations. Research participants were empowered through training and mentoring before leading all phases of the research process from the identification of objectives through to the dissemination of results. Professional researchers stepped back during the process and only acted as facilitators and advisors. This shift in power relations made it possible for local people to drive the research process and production of knowledge with the objective of empowering them to take part in, and directly influence, decision-making. The core of emancipatory research is rooted in the Freirean tradition of enquiry and empowerment which brings back the ideals of participatory approaches in a radical, challenging and transformative way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Emancipation was set as the main goal of many social, political and religious movements in the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The struggle for equal rights and social justice and efforts to gain more power (including political power) have been undertaken by various marginalized groups—the poor, women, ethnic minorities, indigenous peoples, religious factions, the LBTG community and children (amongst many others).

  2. 2.

    Amongst these theories are the critical sociology of the Frankfurt school (associated with Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and others), as well as Paulo Freire’s (1996) critical pedagogy which is discussed shortly.

  3. 3.

    Many of these approaches have been inspired by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s critique of capitalism.

  4. 4.

    See Article 1 of the UNCRPD.

  5. 5.

    The project was ‘Empowerment of DPOs promoting WwDs’ rights in the West Bank’ funded by the European Commission.

  6. 6.

    A special mention should be made of the efforts of one blind woman from Ramallah who spontaneously decided to translate all the tools used by her group into Braille.

  7. 7.

    A fuller discussion of the ER results can be found in ARCO (Action Research for CO-Development) and RIDS (Italian Network on Diversity and Development) (2016).

References

  • ARCO and RIDS. (2016). Emancipatory Disability Research – West Bank, Palestine. Rimini, Italy: EducAid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (2003). What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on Doing “Emancipatory” Disability Research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (2005). Emancipatory Research and Disabled People: Some Observations and Questions. Educational Review, 57(3), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Bellanca, N. (2010). Dalla Relazione di cura alla Relazione di Prossimità l’approccio delle Capability alle Persone con Disabilità [From Care to Disability: The Capability Approach to Persons with Disability]. Napoli, Italy: Liguori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Ferrannini, A. (2014). Sustainable Human Development: A New Territorial and People-Centred Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Libanora, R. (2011). From Valuing to Evaluating: Tools and Procedures to Operationalise the Capability Approach. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the Capability Approach (pp. 79–106). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (2006). The Aesthetics of the Oppressed. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boog, B. W. (2003). The Emancipatory Character of Action Research, Its History and the Present State of the Art. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(6), 426–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, G., Sayrafi, I., & Srour, S. A. (2013). Inclusion or Transformation? An Early Assessment of an Empowerment Project for Disabled People in Occupied Palestine. Disability & Society, 28(6), 812–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, S. (2011). Promoting Empowerment: Emancipatory Research in Community-Based Rehabilitation Programme: Simple Manual for CBR Programme Managers. Bangalore, India: AIFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, S. (2012). Promoting Empowerment: Emancipatory Research in Community-Based Rehabilitation Programme: A Guide for CBR Programme Managers. Bangalore, India: AIFO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deepak, S., Kumar, J., Ramasamy, P., & Griffo, G. (2014). An Emancipatory Research on CBR and the Barriers Faced by Persons with Disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(18), 1502–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, J.-L., & Trani, J. F. (2009). Extending the Capability Paradigm to Address the Complexity of Disability. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research, 3(3), 192–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frediani, A. A. (2010). Sen’s Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development. Development in Practice, 20(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, S. (2006). From Individual to Collective Capabilities: The Capability Approach as a Conceptual Framework for Self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justo, L., & MgSc, F. E. (2005). In a Marginal Voice. From Participatory to Emancipatory Research. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Escuela de Medicina and Facultad de Humanidades Universidad Nacional del Comahue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayess, R., & French, P. (2008). Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libanora, R. (2010). Partecipazione e cooperazione internazionale: per uno sviluppo ‘dal basso’? [Participation and International Cooperation: Development from the Bottom-up]. In M. Biggeri and G. Canitano (Ed.), Temi avanzati di economia e politica della cooperazione internazionale allo sviluppo [Advanced Issues in the Economics and Politics of Development International Cooperation] (pp. 56–85). Milano, Italy: F. Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, V., Biggeri, M., & Grilli, L. (2015). Does Community-Based Rehabilitation Enhance the Multidimensional Well-Being of Deprived Persons with Disabilities? A Multilevel Impact Evaluation. World Development, 76, 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, G. (2004). From Critique to Practice: Emancipatory Disability Research. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research (pp. 118–137). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. (2006). The Capability Approach and Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S., & Ruger, J. P. (Eds.). (2017). Heath, Disability and the Capability Approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the Social Relations of Research Production? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability. From Theory to Practice. New York/Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1997). Emancipatory Research: Realistic Goal or Impossible Dream. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing Disability Research (pp. 15–31). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) and Ministry of Social Affairs. (2011). Press Conference Report, Disability Survey. Ramallah, Palestine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (1997). Who’s Research? A Personal Audit. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing Disability Research (pp. 88–107). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, P. (2013). Q-Squared: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Poverty Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, L. (2005). Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trani, J. F., Bakhshi, P., Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). Disabilities through the Capability Approach lens: Implications for public policies. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research, 5(3), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Enable. (2007). Making it work – Civil society Participation in the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Recommendations from the Expert Group to Civil Society. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCRPD. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Biggeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biggeri, M., Ciani, F. (2019). Emancipatory Research as Empowerment: An Illustration from a Research Study of Persons with Disabilities in Palestine. In: Clark, D.A., Biggeri, M., Frediani, A.A. (eds) The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation. Rethinking International Development series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics