Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Problem with Economics: Naturalism, Critique and Performativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enacting Dismal Science

Part of the book series: Perspectives from Social Economics ((PSE))

Abstract

How natural is economic nature and how provocative is it to claim that this nature is a provoke done? The purpose of this contribution is to expose the problem of the naturalness of economic things. Naturalism in modern economic reason is examined through a series of ‘breaching thought experiments’: intellectual setups in which economics, economic critique and the critique of economics are confronted to annoying situations or uncomfortable paradoxes. The very idea of the performativity of economics and the critical reactions it prompts are analysed in these terms: that is, as an anthropological test on the quandaries of economic naturalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The reflection that follows was initially elaborated as a contribution to the Colloque de Cerisy on ‘The Historical Anthropology of Scientific Reason’ organized by Philippe Descola and Bruno Latour (12–19 July 2006). It was also presented at the ‘Markets, Economics, Culture and Performativity’ Conference at Goldsmiths organized by Will Davies and José Ossandón (6 March 2007) and then transformed into a contribution to ‘Performativities: Contexts, Domains, Perspectives’, a publication project (sadly suspended) prepared by Silvia Posocco and Sadie Wearing. After sleeping for a few years, it gained the opportunity to reach the published side of the world as a contribution to this collection of essays prepared by Ivan Boldyrev and Ekaterina Svetlova. Acknowledgements are also due to funding provided by the European Research Council (grant no. 263529). I thank Daniel Beunza, Ivan Boldyrev, Michel Callon, Will Davies, Philippe Descola, Keith Hart, Petter Holm, Bruno Latour, Scott Lash, Javier Lezaun, Emilio Luque, Donald MacKenzie, José Ossandón, Paolo Quattrone, Ekaterina Svetlova, Silvia Posocco, Yamina Tadjeddine, David Teira, Manuel Torres and Sadie Wearing for their remarks on this unusual essay or for the conversations that contributed to the reflection.

  2. 2.

    Actor–network theory—a scholarly viewpoint of which Michel Callon is an active proponent—originated as both a materialist approach to the study of science and technology and a pragmatist critique of regular sociological explanatory categories (see Muniesa 2015).

  3. 3.

    Francesco Guala’s phrasing conveys this idea remarkably well: ‘Economic rationality is not like Newton’s laws, which are supposed to be at work everywhere in the universe. It is a fragile property that must be carefully preserved by creating a hospitable environment’ (Guala 2007, 147).

  4. 4.

    But see also the clarification provided by Marshall Sahlins (2008).

  5. 5.

    Eduardo Viveiros de Castro uses the notion of ‘multinaturalism’ to characterize this feature of Amazonian thought (Viveiros de Castro 1998, 2004; see also Latour 2004).

  6. 6.

    The structural classification proposed by Descola adds to naturalism and animism, two other forms of intellection, which are totemism and analogism. In naturalism, the universality of physicality is linked to the contingency of interiorities. In animism, the generalization of interiority is a counterpoint to the differentiation of physicalities. Totemism is characterized by a moral and material continuity of physicality and interiority. Analogism is the realm of multiple differences at both levels, and of multiple networks of correspondence that make the world readable as an ongoing chain of relations.

  7. 7.

    This instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on a real conversation with a British academic on how to translate slightly ambiguous expressions like ‘économie des conventions’ or ‘économie alternative’, for which both ‘economics’ and ‘economy’ may make sense (but mean entirely different things).

  8. 8.

    For useful examinations of the origins of the notion of ‘the economy’, see for instance Breslau (2003), Mitchell (1998, 2002, 2008) and Goswami (2004).

  9. 9.

    This second instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on one actual discussion at the seminar of an interdisciplinary academic society which includes economists, sociologists, anthropologists and political scientists as members and which hosts a monthly research seminar in Paris on the ‘social studies of finance’. A clarification was needed to convince one economist (who actually made a point of speaking ‘as an economist’) that ‘sciences sociales’ was short for ‘sciences économiques et sociales’, not a nasty way to exclude economics. The name of the ESRC (the British Economic and Social Research Council) can also serve as a blatant demonstration.

  10. 10.

    This instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is inspired by observations at one panel discussion at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science held in Paris in 2004.

  11. 11.

    A particularly helpful introduction to the analysis of the role of metrology in the construction of universality is O’Connell (1993).

  12. 12.

    On the ‘scholastic fallacies’ of economics, see for instance Bourdieu (1997, 2005). On the problems of criticizing the unrealism of assumptions in economics, see Cartwright (1999).

  13. 13.

    This fourth ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on memories from the first year of the undergraduate programme in economics at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (I then had to redirect preferences to sociology).

  14. 14.

    I owe to Petter Holm a particularly brilliant interpretation of neoliberal economics in the light of Right Said Fred’s debut song ‘I’m too sexy’: the music stops abruptly after we hear ‘I’m too sexy for this song’.

  15. 15.

    This last instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is inspired by the discussions that took place during a workshop on ‘The Performativities of Economics’ held in Paris in August 2004. A number of papers presented at the workshop evolved into contributions to MacKenzie et al. (2007), others were part of Callon et al. (2007).

  16. 16.

    A follow-up of this discussion can be read in a series of reactions and of further clarifications (Callon 2005; Miller 2005; see also Barry and Slater 2005). An accurate appraisal is offered by Holm (2007).

  17. 17.

    An almost identical version of the argument is published as Mirowski and Nik-Khah (2008).

  18. 18.

    The empirical parts of the critique by Mirowski and Nik-Khah focus on an article by Francesco Guala on the role played by economics (game theory and experimental economics) in the construction of spectrum auctions (Guala 2001). A further exchange is available in Edward Nik-Khah (2006) and Guala (2006). See also Callon (2007a), Nik-Khah (2008) and Muniesa and Callon (2009).

  19. 19.

    I put here the topic of shared academic socialization and scholarly habits aside.

  20. 20.

    If we play with Descola’s structural categories, we could think of the role of Callon in this ‘breaching thought experiment’ as impersonating the menace of analogism over naturalism, that is, the menace of a style of intellection that would be attentive to varied correspondences between economists and economies, both imitating each other, engendering each other.

  21. 21.

    In a critical review of MacKenzie et al. (2007) published in the Journal of Economic Literature, David Colander (a reputable economist) says among other things that he does not understand the notion of performativity very well, that he dislikes it and finds it irritating, that proponents in that field think this topic is new but in reality it is not, that the point is about signalling a contradiction in economics but that there is no such contradiction, that most economists are indifferent to science studies and would not care about this discussion, and, finally, that economics should perform more and better (Colander 2008).

  22. 22.

    I refer instead the reader to the tradition of ‘provocative containment’ examined in Lezaun et al. (2013). I owe to Javier Izquierdo the idea that cultural pranks can operate as vehicles for economic inquiry (Izquierdo Antonio 2010).

References

  • Ariztía, Tomás (ed.). 2012. Produciendo lo social: Usos de las Ciencias Sociales en el Chile Reciente. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Andrew, and Don Slater (eds.). 2005. The Technological Economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Le Champ Économique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 119(1): 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, Daniel. 2003. Economics Invents the Economy: Mathematics, Statistics, and Models in the Work of Irving Fisher and Wesley Mitchell. Theory and Society 32(3): 379–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 1998. The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 1999. Whose Imposture? Physicists at War with the Third Person. Social Studies of Science 29(2): 261–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2005. Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence: A Reply to Daniel Miller’s Critique of The Laws of the Markets. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 6(2): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2007a. An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2007b. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa (eds.). 2007. Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, James G., and Daniel Miller (eds.). 1998. Virtualism: A New Political Economy. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, David. 2008. Review of ‘Do Economists Make Markets?’ Journal of Economic Literature 46(3): 720–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeulenaere, Pierre. 1996. Homo Oeconomicus: Enquête sur la Constitution d’un Paradigme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, Nigel. 1994. The Sociology of Money: Economics, Reason and Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, Louis. 1992. Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 1992. Le Sacrifice et l’ Envie: Le Libéralisme aux Prises avec la Justice Sociale. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Ben. 2003. Callonistics: A Disentanglement. Economy and Society 32(3): 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, Marion. 2007. Theories of Markets and Theories of Society. American Behavioral Scientist 50(8): 1015–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, Manu. 2004. Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2001. Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 32(3): 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2006. Getting the FCC Auctions Straight: A Reply to Nik-Khah. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 7(3): 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Petter. 2007. Which Way is Up on Callon? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 225–243. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, Anthony G., and Peter Miller (eds.). 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao, Bruna, and Giorgio Israel. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo Antonio, Javier. 2010. Marcianos, Melanesios, Millonarios, Mochileros y Murcianos: De la Perdición Económica o el Turista Espacial. San Fernando de Henares: Fiesta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2004. A Nonhumanist Disposition: On Performativity, Practical Ontology, and Intervention. Configurations 1(2): 229–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Geoff, Christine McLean, and Paolo Quattrone. 2004. Spacing and Timing. Organization 11(6): 723–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, Javier, Fabian Muniesa, and Signe Vikkelsø. 2013. Provocative Containment and the Drift of Social-Scientific Realism. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(3): 278–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald. 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu (eds.). 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Daniel. 2002. Turning Callon the Right Way Up. Economy and Society 31(2): 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Daniel. 2005. Reply to Michel Callon. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 6(3): 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip. 2004. The Effortless Economy of Science? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2007. Markets Made Flesh: Performativity, and a Problem in Science Studies, Augmented with Consideration of the FCC Auctions. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 190–224. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2008. Command Performance: Exploring What STS Thinks It Takes to Build a Market. In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Trevor Pinch and Richard Swedberg, 89–128. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 1998. Fixing the Economy. Cultural Studies 12(1): 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy. 2008. Rethinking Economy. Geoforum 39(3): 1116–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montecinos, Verónica, and John Markoff (eds.). 2009. Economists in the Americas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa, Fabian. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa, Fabian. 2015. Actor-Network Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by James D. Wright, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., 80–84. Amsterdam etc: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa, Fabian, and Michel Callon. 2009. La Performativité des Sciences Économiques. In Traité de Sociologie Économique, edited by Philippe Steiner and François Vatin, 289–324. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nik-Khah, Edward. 2006. What the FCC Auctions Can Tell Us About the Performativity Thesis. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 7(2): 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nik-Khah, Edward. 2008. A Tale of Two Auctions. Journal of Institutional Economics 4(1): 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, Joseph. 1993. Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 129–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Michael (ed.). 1996. Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 2008. The Western Illusion of Human Nature: With Reflections on the Long History of Hierarchy, Equality and the Sublimation of Anarchy in the West, and Comparative Notes on Other Conceptions of the Human Condition. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, Juan Gabriel. 1995. Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3): 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies. Common Knowledge 10(3): 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, Viviana A. 1997. The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech (École des Mines de Paris), Paris, France

    Fabian Muniesa

Authors
  1. Fabian Muniesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Germany

    Ivan Boldyrev

  2. Leicester, United Kingdom

    Ekaterina Svetlova

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muniesa, F. (2016). The Problem with Economics: Naturalism, Critique and Performativity. In: Boldyrev, I., Svetlova, E. (eds) Enacting Dismal Science. Perspectives from Social Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49210-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48876-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation