Skip to main content

Elite Circulation and Stability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites

Abstract

The chapter starts from a short review of the classical contributions on elites’ circulation and stability, and then deals with how these concepts have been treated and applied in the study of transformations to representative democracy during the twentieth century. An updated assessment of the empirical studies dealing with different aspects of elite circulation is offered, focusing on research questions concerning quantitative and qualitative elite turnover, elite stability, and the strictly connected notions of political career and party professionalism. A final section examines current research on the dynamics of elite circulation and looks at the new challenges posed to political elites in times of democratic crisis and public mistrust, which seem to raise innovative and fascinating questions about the capability of ruling elites to persist or to accelerate the pace of their continuous transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Best, H. (2007). New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites. Comparative Sociology, 6, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (2000). Parliamentary Representatives in Europe. 1848–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. S. (1972). A Theory of Political Ambition. American Political Science Review, 66, 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J. (1985). Government Ministers in the Contemporary World. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., & Thiebault, J. L. (Eds.). (1991). The Profession of Government Ministers in Western Democracies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, J. (2003). Professional Politicians: Towards a Comparative Perspective. In J. Borchert & J. Zeiss (Eds.), The Political Class in Advanced Democracies (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, J., & Zeiss, J. (Eds.). (2003). The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Pinto, A., Cotta, M., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (Eds.). (2017). Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, M., & Best, H. (Eds.). (2007). Democratic Representation in Europe. Diversity, Change and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M. (Ed.). (1989). Pathways to Power: Selecting Rulers in Pluralist Democracies. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M., & Higley, J. (Eds.). (1998). Elites, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K., & Dumont, P. (Eds.). (2009). The Selection of Ministers in Europe. Hiring and Firing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K., & Dumont, P. (Eds.). (2015). The Selection of Ministers in Europe and Around the World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. (2014). Who’s Running America? (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger, L. (Ed.). (1967). Political Leadership in Industrialized Societies. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Femia, J. (2006). Pareto and Political Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, G. L., & Higley, J. (1980). Elitism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W. L., & Kenny, L. W. (1999). Up the Political Ladder: Career Paths in US Politics. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1973). The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouglas, A., Maddens, B., & Brans, M. (2016). Determinants of Parliamentary Turnover in Western Europe 1945–2016. Paper submitted at the 24th World Congress of Political Science Association, IPSA, Poznan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, R., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, R., & Moore, M. (1993). Political Ambitions’ Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger Typology Reconsidered and Revisited. Journal of Politics, 55, 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbings, J. R. (1991). Congressional Careers. Contours of Life in the US House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higley, J., & Pakulski, J. (2012). Pareto’s Theory of Elite Cycles: A Reconsideration and Application. In J. V. Femia & A. J. Marshall (Eds.), Vilfredo Pareto Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries (pp. 111–130). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1981). The Rise of Career Politicians in Britain. And Its Consequences. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 249–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics. Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H., & Lerner, D. (Eds.). (1965). World Revolutionary Elites: Studies in Coercive Ideological Movements. Cambridge: Mit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of Democratic Systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western State. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matland, R. E., & Studlar, D. T. (2004). Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis. British Political Science Journal, 34, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and Classifying Technocrat-led and Technocratic Governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 654–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca, G. (1923). Elementi di scienza politica (2nd ed.). Torino: Bocca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (Ed.). (1997). Passages to Power. Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, W. (1916). Trattato di Sociologia Generale. Firenze: BarbĂ©ra. English translation: The Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, G. (1969). Political Elites. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. (1968). The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 62, 144–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1968). Political Power and Social Classes. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, W. B. (1969). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New York: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of Public Service in Britain. Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, P. (1993). Honest Opportunism: The Rise of the Career Politician. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, D. A. (1966). The Study of Elites: Who’s Who, When, and How. World Politics, 1, 690–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, J. (1966). Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somit, A., Wildenman, R., Boll, B., & Römmele, A. (Eds.). (1994). The Victorious Incumbent: A Threat to Democracy? Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, E. N. (Ed.). (1986). Parliaments and Parliamentarians in Democratic Politics. London: Holmes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, J. W., Borrelli, S. A., Reed, B. C., & Evans, S. F. (2000). A New Look at Turnover in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1789–1998. American Politics Quarterly, 28, 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theakston, K., & de Vries, J. (Eds.). (2012). Former Leaders in Modern Democracies. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (Ed.). (1987). Elites and the Idea of Equality: A Comparison of Japan, Sweden and the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Beyme, K. (1993). Die politische Klasse im Parteienstaat. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verzichelli, L. (2018). Elite Circulation and Stability. In: Best, H., Higley, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics