Skip to main content

Studying Patient Safety: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizing Patient Safety

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

Abstract

Under headlines such as human factors, ‘non-blame’ and systems thinking, mainstream patient safety thinking and practice is, on the one hand, made up of a number of dominating presuppositions about human nature, risk and organizational reality, and, on the other, concrete technologies for incident reporting, error handling and risk reduction. In this introduction, Pedersen presents her study of this international policy programme and its meeting with clinical practice. The chapter includes a description of alternative strategies for studying safety, the Danish case study on which the book is based and the ‘pragmatic stance’ of the book: a commitment to the empirical field and the problem at hand which involves problem orientation, attention to the pragmatic method of inquiry and a steady focus on practical reasoning and the actual clinical situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.who.int/patientsafety/about/en/index.html.

  2. 2.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_safety_organization.

  3. 3.

    Danish hospitals are governed by five national regions, while 98 Danish municipalities run the primary care.

  4. 4.

    http://patientsikkerhed.dk/en/.

  5. 5.

    The Danish patient safety policy programme is only one of several parallel systems for the governance of medical errors in Danish healthcare, which also comprises systems for patients’ rights and complaints, supervisory functions and patient insurance and compensation. Of these functions, the publicly funded compensation scheme is run by the Danish Patient Compensation Association separately from the complaints system. As for the remaining functions they have been merged since 2011 and in the fall of 2015 the Danish Patient Safety Authority was formed to administer incident reporting, the patient complaints system and the supervisory authorities.

  6. 6.

    See the Law on Health, Act No. 288 of 15/04/2009.

  7. 7.

    The Danish Institute for Health Services Research (DSI), now part of The Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research (KORA), co-financed my PhD project, which has laid the groundwork for this book. As part of this arrangement, I conducted a pilot study for The Danish Society for Patient Safety of ‘adverse events’ in elderly care units (see Jensen and Pedersen 2010).

  8. 8.

    In total, the ethnographic material for this book comprises a total of around 300 hours of observation and interviews with 28 people. All quotes from the fieldwork are translated from Danish.

References

  • Allen, D., Braithwaite, J., Sandall, J., & Waring, J. (2016). Towards a sociology of healthcare safety and quality. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Ed.). Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. R., Norton, P. G., Flintoft, V., Blais, R., Brown, A., Cox, J., et al. (2004). The Canadian Adverse Events Study: The incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(11), 1678–1686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you are doing it. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (1997). Rationalizing medical work: Decision-support techniques and medical practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosk, C. L. (1979/2003). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., Wears, R. L., & Hollnagel, E. (2015). Resilient health care: Turning patient safety on its head. International Journal for Quality in Healthcare, 27(5), 418–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N., et al. (1991). Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: Results from the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, T. (1994). Primum non nocere? Lancet, 344, 1487–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. B., & Weingart, S. N. (2005). Organizational change in the face of highly public errors—I. The Dana-Faber Cancer Institute experience. Perspectives on Safety, Patient Safety Network, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department for Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Waring, J., & Finn, R. (2008). The limits of knowledge management for UK public services modernization: The case of patient safety and service quality. Public Administration, 86, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., Lay-Yee, R., Briant, R., et al. (2002). Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: Occurrence and impact. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 115(1167), 1167–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. (2012). Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability (2nd ed.). Farnham, London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2000). An organisation with a memory: Expert group report. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education (1st paperback ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Promentheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the know. Boston, MA: The Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P., & Vikkelsø, S. (2013). Exploitation, exploration and exaltation: Notes on a metaphysical (re)turn to ‘one best way of organizing’. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 37, 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1957). Training for uncertainty. In R. K. Merton, G. Reader, & P. L. Kendall (Eds.), The student-physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education (pp. 207–241). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Braithwaite, J., & Wears, R. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient health care. Surrey, London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., Wears, R., & Braithwaite, J. (2015). From Safety-I to Safety-II: A white paper. The Resilient Health Care Net, Published by the University of Southern Denmark, University of Florida, USA, and Macquarie University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2009). In case of emergency: Misunderstanding tradeoffs in the war on terror. California Law Review, 92(2), 301–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I. (2006). The history of theory. Critical Inquiry, 3, 78–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffcott, S., Ibrahim, J., & Cameron, P. (2009). Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18, 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. B. (2008). Sociology, systems and (patient) safety: Knowledge translation in healthcare policy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(2), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. B. (2004). Root cause analysis: Compendium for use by patient safety officers and others responsible for conducting root cause analysis of adverse events. Copenhagen: Dansk Selskab for Patientsikkerhed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. L., & Pedersen, K. Z. (2010). Utilsigtede hændelser i den kommunale plejesektor. Copenhagen: DSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerak-Zuiderent, S. (2012). Certain uncertainties: Modes of patient safety in healthcare. Social Studies of Science, 42(5), 732–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, N., Brown, G. D., & Hicks, L. L. (2009). From a blame culture to a just culture in health care. Health Care Management Review, 34(4), 312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2000). Ladbroke Grove: Or how to think about failing systems. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, UK. Retrieved June 29, 2013, from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Ladbroke-Grove-Failing-Systems.pdf

  • Leape, L. L. (1994). Error in medicine. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(23), 1851–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leape, L. L. (1997). A systems analysis approach to medical error. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 3(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leape, L. L., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N., et al. (1991). The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(6), 377–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leape, L. L., Woods, D. D., Hatlie, M. J., et al. (1998). Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA, 280(16), 1444–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesman, J. (2008). Uncertainty and medical innovation: Experienced pioneers in neonatal care. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mesman, J. (2009). The geography of patient safety: A topical analysis of sterility. Social Science & Medicine, 69(9), 1705–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1990). On the interrelations between accounting and the state. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1991). Accounting innovation beyond the enterprise: Problematizing investment decisions and programming economic growth in the UK in the 1960s. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(8), 733–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS. (2008). Root Cause Analysis Investigation Tools: Guide to investigation report writing following Root Cause Analysis of patient safety incidents. National Patient Safety Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, AJ (2010). Travelling technologies and transformations in healthcare. PhD Series, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, M. (1988). The unity of mistake: A phenomenological interpretation of medical work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1972/1979). Complex organizations: A critical essay (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., Scheytt, T., Soin, K., & Sahlin, K. (2009). Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30(2/3), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 172–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, M. M. (1995). The incompetent doctor: Behind closed doors. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, E., & Waring, J. (2011). Introduction: A socio-cultural perspective on patient safety. In E. Rowley & J. Waring (Eds.), A socio-cultural perspective on patient safety (pp. 1–12). London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiøler, T., Lipczak, H., Frølich, A., et al. (2001). Utilsigtede hændelser på danske sygehuse. Copenhagen: DSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. M. (2005). Origin and uses of Primum Non Nocere—Above all, do no harm! The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 45, 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., Faugerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, B. (1985). Social organization of medical work. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenningsen, S. (2003). Electronic patient records and medical practice: Reorganization of roles, responsibilities, and risks. PhD Series 10.2003, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Danish Patient Safety Authority. (2017). Dansk Patientsikkerhedsdatabase Årsberetning 2016. Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, K. E. (2004). The medical malpractice ‘crisis’: Recent trends and the impact of state tort reforms. Health Affairs, Web exclusives, W4-20-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbs, O. (2007). Introducing the idea of fair blame. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 279(Suppl.), B37–B38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. C. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C. (2010). Patient safety (2nd ed.). BMJ Books. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., Burnett, S., & Carthey, J. (2013). The measurement and monitoring of safety: Drawing together academic evidence and practical experience to produce a framework for safety measurement and monitoring. London: The Health Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., Neale, G., & Woloshynowych, M. (2001). Adverse events in British hospitals: Preliminary retrospective record review. British Medical Journal, 322(7285), 517–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, J., Allen, D., Braithwaite, J., & Sandall, J. (2016). Healthcare quality and safety: A review of policy, practice and research. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38, 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2004). World alliance for patient safety. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2005). World alliance for patient safety: Draft guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems. From information to action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. M., Runciman, W. B., Gibberd, R. W., et al. (1995). The quality in Australian health care study. The Medical Journal of Australia, 163(9), 458–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, H., Lemer, C., & Wu, A. (2009). An end to the witch hunts: Responding to the defenders of blame and shame: A commentary on Collins, Block, Arnold and Christakis. Social Science and Medicine, 69(9), 1291–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A. (2000). Medical error: The second victim. British Medical Journal, 320, 726–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiderent-Jerak, T., Strating, M., Nieboer, A., & Bal, R. (2009). Sociological refigurations of patient safety: Ontologies of improvement and ‘acting with’ quality collaboratives in healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 69(9), 1713–1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pedersen, K.Z. (2018). Studying Patient Safety: An Introduction. In: Organizing Patient Safety. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53786-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53786-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53785-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53786-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics