Skip to main content

Leading the Change in Europe: Early Implementation of the ‘Bologna Process’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Changing Governance in Universities

Abstract

The reforms of the Italian universities implemented during this period were characterized by two unique features that were to condition their outcome. On the one hand, a favourable policy window made it possible to reform the university curricula, following the Bologna Declaration, of which Italy had been one of the promoters. On the other hand, the implementation of that reform suffered significant shortcomings and raised the perception of ineffectiveness and inefficiency. Consequently, governments started to include a number of restrictions on the universities’ autonomy, and to establish standards which the universities were called upon to conform to, while reintroducing a logic of centralized bureaucratic control. Moreover, the universities’ behaviour contributed towards creating mistrust in the academic world, which was to be of key importance as a basis for subsequent legislative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Law no. 59/1997 and Law no. 127/1997.

  2. 2.

    The commission was to take the name of its coordinator, Martinotti.

  3. 3.

    The parliamentary majority remained exactly the same, and political ‘continuity’ was guaranteed by the permanence of the Under Secretary who followed the implementation of the measure.

  4. 4.

    Many of the aforementioned guidelines are not contained in the Bologna Declaration, which goes no further than setting forth certain key points. Said guidelines were added later, within the context of the Bologna Process which, through a series of biennial meetings of ministers, addressed the harmonization of the architecture of Europe’s HE systems.

  5. 5.

    A provision of 2003 permitted the creation of 11 private online universities (authorized exclusively to provide e-learning services).

References

  • Capano, G. (2008). Looking for serendipity: The problematical reform of government within Italy’s universities. Higher Education, 55(4), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondazione Agnelli. (2012). I Nuovi Laureati. La Riforma del 3+2 alla Prova del Mercato del Lavoro. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G. (2001). L’Odissea dell’Università Nuova. Firenze: la Nuova Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G. (2008). I Problemi della Didattica. In R. Moscati & M. Vaira (Eds.), L’Università di fronte al Cambiamento. Bologna: Il Mulino, 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G. (2010). Il Cambiamento del Sistema Universitario Italiano: Lo Scenario di Riferimento. In R. Moscati (Ed.), Come e Perché Cambiano le Università in Italia e in Europa. Nuove Politiche dell’Istruzione Superiore e Resistenza al Cambiamento. Napoli: Liguori, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G., & Moscati, R. (2005). University reform in Italy: fears, expectations and contradictions. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education. Dordrecht: Cher-Springer, 153–168.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martinotti, G. (1997). Autonomia Didattica e Innovazione dei Corsi di Studio di Livello Universitario e Post-universitario Rapporto Finale del Gruppo di Lavoro Ministeriale sull’Autonomia Didattica. Roma: MURST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minelli, E., Rebora, G., Turri, M. (2008). The structure and significance of the Italian research assessment exercise (VTR). In C. Mazza, P. Quattrone, A. Riccaboni (Eds.), European universities in transition. London: Edward Elgar, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIUR. (2009). Ulteriori Interventi per la Razionalizzazione e Qualificazione dell’Offerta Formativa nella Prospettiva dell’Accreditamento dei Corsi di Studio. http://attiministeriali.miur.it/anno-2009/settembre/nota-04092009.aspx. Accessed 15 May 2016.

  • Moscati, R. (2001). Italian university professors in transition. Higher Education, 41(1), 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1979). Academic drift: some views from Europe. Studies in Higher Education, 4(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebora, G. (1999b). La Valutazione dei Risultati nelle Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Milano: Guerini e Associati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2009). Governance in higher education: an analysis of the Italian experience. In J. Huisman (Ed.), International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination. New York: Routledge, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013). The UK and Italian Research Assessment Exercises face to face. Research Policy, 42(9), 1657–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regini, M. (ed.). (2009). Malata e Denigrata: L’Università Italiana a confronto con l’Europa. Roma: Donzelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1990). Political competition and differentiation in higher education. In A. Jeffrey & P. Colomy (Eds.), Differentiation theory and social change: comparative and historical perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 187–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F. (2009). Increased competition and diversity in higher education: an empirical analysis of the Italian university system. Higher Education Policy, 22(4), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F. (2010). Massification, competition and organizational diversity in higher education: evidence from Italy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombetti, A. L., & Stanchi, A. (2010). L’Università Italiana e l’Europa. Analisi dei Sistemi di Istruzione Superiore: Italia, Francia, Germania, Regno Unito, Spagna, Svezia, Ungheria. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turri, M. (2014). The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): a need for governance or legitimacy?. Quality in Higher Education, 20(1), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems, CHET anniversary conference. http://www.universityworldnews.com/filemgmt_data/files/Frans-van-Vucht.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Capano, G., Regini, M., Turri, M. (2016). Leading the Change in Europe: Early Implementation of the ‘Bologna Process’. In: Changing Governance in Universities. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54817-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54817-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54816-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54817-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics