Skip to main content

Holmes into Challenger: The Dark Investigator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sherlock Holmes in Context

Part of the book series: Crime Files ((CF))

  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the kinship between Sherlock Holmes and Conan Doyle’s next best-known serial protagonist, Professor George Edward Challenger, examining some of the ways that Challenger is a continuation and a criticism of what Holmes embodied. Holmes the “scientific detective” is taken here as an instantiation of the modern professional expert, a pivotal figure in the Victorian knowledge revolution. The portrayal of Holmes’s powers is an index of the awe in which Conan Doyle and his contemporaries held these experts, but it also reveals an anxiety about the way these masters of knowledge could appear inhuman and irresponsible. These tendencies in Holmes reappear in the person of Challenger, the scientific investigator pursuing knowledge with an egotistical disregard for the consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 90.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    References in this chapter to Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories are to the Penguin edition.

  2. 2.

    For example, the adding machine patented by William Seward Burroughs in 1888, the year after the first appearance of Holmes in print.

  3. 3.

    In A Study in Scarlet Holmes expounds his own theory of interpretative backtelling in his article “The Book of Life,” which speaks of inferring an Atlantic or a Niagara from a drop of water (23).

  4. 4.

    Rationally regulated association within a structure of domination finds its typical expression in bureaucracy…The charismatic structure of domination rests upon individual authority which is based neither upon rational rules nor upon tradition” (ii 954).

  5. 5.

    For a more detailed exposition of the relation of Doyle’s life and writing to cultures of knowledge, see Kerr (41–122).

  6. 6.

    Masculine pronouns seem appropriate for generalizations about Victorian doctors. See Digby, Loudon, Porter, and Perkin. Women were utterly debarred from the profession until the 1870s, and began to practice in very small numbers thereafter. See Dixon Smith, and Doyle’s story “The Doctors of Hoyland” (Round the Red Lamp 256–72).

  7. 7.

    See Sebeok and Umiker-Sebeok.

  8. 8.

    He wrote about what he saw in Berlin in a letter to the Daily Telegraph (Letters to the Press 35–37), a commissioned article for W. T. Stead’s Review of Reviews (“Dr Koch”), and later in the memoir Memories and Adventures (87–91), in which he details Bergmann’s bullying and unprofessional bad manners as he “rushed on with his court all grinning at the snub which the presumptuous Englishman had received.” Doyle was less critical of Koch, while suggesting, and in later tellings confirming, that Koch’s tuberculin treatment was not an effective cure for the disease. He later claimed his Telegraph letter was “the very first which appeared upon the side of doubt and caution” about the cure (90). See also Kerr (79–99).

  9. 9.

    Challenger does not appear ever to have held a university position, and finances his work by private means. His title may be simply honorific, as seems also to be the case with his irascible exact contemporary, Professor Henry Higgins in Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion (1912). It appears later, in The Land of Mist (278–79), that Challenger did practice as a doctor in his youth.

  10. 10.

    This is a trope that goes back to Aristotle, but had also figured in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, in which scientific research is consistently represented as a stripping and penetration of feminized nature.

Works Cited

  • Conrad, Joseph. Nostromo. Ed. Jacques Berthoud and Mara Kalnins. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species. Ed. J. W. Burrow. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, Anne. The Evolution of British General Practice 1850–1948. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon Smith, R. “Feminism and the Role of Women in Conan Doyle’s Domestic Fiction.” ACD: Journal of the Arthur Conan Doyle Society 5 (1994): 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Arthur Conan. “Dr. Koch and his Cure.” Review of Reviews 2.12 (1890): 552–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Letters to the Press. Ed. John Michael Gibson and Richard Lancelyn Green. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Memories and Adventures. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Round the Red Lamp: Being Facts and Fancies of Medical Life. Fairfield, IA: First World Library, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Crime of the Congo. Honolulu: UP of the Pacific, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Land of Mist. London: Hutchinson, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Maracot Deep and Other Stories. London: John Murray, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Penguin Complete Sherlock Holmes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Owen Dudley. The Quest for Sherlock Holmes: A Biographical Study of Arthur Conan Doyle. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. 2nd edn. London: Frank Cass, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Thomas H. “On the Method of Zadig.” Collected Essays. Vol. 4. London: Macmillan, 1911. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, John. “On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer.” The Major Works. 1990 Ed. Elizabeth Cook. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Douglas. Conan Doyle: Writing, Profession, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, Irvine. Medical Care and the General Practitioner 1750–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, Harold. The Rise of Professional Society: England Since 1880. 1989. London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy. Disease, Medicine and Society in England 1550–1860. 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas A. and Jean Umiker-Sebeok, “‘You Know My Method’: A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes.” The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Ed. Umberto Eco and Thomas A. Sebeok. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1983. 11–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, George Bernard. Pygmalion. Ed. Dan H. Laurence. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyndall, John. “The Scientific Use of the Imagination.” Scientific Addresses. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995. 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. Economy and Society. 2 vols. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Kerr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerr, D. (2017). Holmes into Challenger: The Dark Investigator. In: Naidu, S. (eds) Sherlock Holmes in Context. Crime Files. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55595-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics