Abstract
Neo-liberalism’s resilience since the financial crisis has by now become a commonplace observation. In the case of Ireland, however, it might be more apt to speak of not just neo-liberalism’s resilience but also its active reinforcement. By re-visiting Hall’s (1993) essay on paradigm change and paying particular attention to the adaptive quality of what he calls first and second order paradigm change and by reading his work against more recent scholarship on the relationship between ideas and power, how Ireland’s response to its crisis has reinforced its dominant neo-liberal policy paradigm is detailed in this chapter. How neo-liberal ideas, despite provoking controversy, remained powerful in domestic debate in the aftermath of the crisis is demonstrated. Moreover, in this chapter, the argument that by the time financial support was acquired, European Union (EU) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) actors were, for the most part, ‘pushing against an open door’ with Irish political elites in relation to deficit reduction, how to achieve it and its role in economic recovery is given. Focusing on changes to taxation and social protection in particular, an analysis regarding how the reinforcement of the neo-liberal paradigm is evident in efforts made to limit tax increases, whereas more radical retrenchment and reform of social protection is taking place to ensure its closer compatibility with the perceived needs of a globalised neo-liberal economic paradigm is provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Begg, D. (2013, February 22). The implications of the crisis for European integration and democratic legitimacy, address to EU heads of mission. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://www.ictu.ie/download/pdf/address_to_eu_heads_of_mission_db_feb_22_2102.pdf
Béland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 39(1), 1–18.
Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–718.
Bew, P., Hazelkorn, E., & Patterson, H. (1989). The dynamics of Irish politics. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and paradox: The politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197–215.
Burke, M. (2011). Who benefits from the crisis in Ireland? Soundings, 47(Spring), 130–142.
Collins, M., & Walsh, M. (2011). Tax expenditures: Revenue and information forgone – The experience of Ireland (Working Paper No. 1211). Dublin, Ireland: Trinity Economics Papers.
Community Platform. (2011). Paying our way. Dublin: Community Platform.
Cowen, B. (2009). Statement on the budget by the Taoiseach Mr. Brian Cowen T.D., Dáil Éireann, Thursday, 10 December 2009, at 11.00 a.m. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie
Cowen, B. (2010). Speech by the Taoiseach, Mr. Brian Cowen TD on the 2011 Budget, Dáil Éireann, Wednesday, 8 December 2010, at 10.45 a.m. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie
Cox, R. (2001). The social construction of an imperative: Why welfare reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics, 53(3), 463–498.
Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Department of Finance. (2009). Replacement rates and unemployment. Dublin: Department of Finance.
Department of Finance. (2014). Draft Ireland’s stability programme update April 2014. Dublin: Department of Finance.
Department of Social Protection. (2010). Report on the desirability and feasibility of introducing a single social assistance payment for people of working age. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.
Department of Social Protection. (2011). Project plan for the development and implementation of the national employment entitlements service. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.
Department of Social Protection. (2014). Annual report 2013. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
Department of the Taoiseach. (2009). Framework for a pact for stabilisation, social solidarity and economic renewal. Dublin: Department of the Taoiseach.
DG ECFIN. (2011). The economic adjustment programme for Ireland: Spring 2011 review. Brussels: European Commission.
DG ECFIN. (2012a). Annual growth survey 2013. Brussels: European Commission.
DG ECFIN. (2012b). Economic adjustment programme for Ireland: Winter 2011 review. Brussels: European Commission.
DG ECFIN. (2012c). Economic adjustment programme for Ireland: Spring 2012 review. Brussels: European Commission.
DG ECFIN. (2013). Economic adjustment programme for Ireland: Autumn 2013 review. Brussels: European Commission.
DG EMPL. (2007). Joint report on social protection and social inclusion 2007. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Dukelow, F. (2005). A path towards a more ‘employment friendly’ liberal regime? Globalisation and the Irish social security system. In B. Cantillon & I. Marx (Eds.), International co-operation in social security: How to cope with globalisation (pp. 125–154). Antwerp: Intersentia.
Dukelow, F. (2015). State to the rescue: The bank guarantee and Ireland’s financialised neo-liberal growth model. In R. Meade & F. Dukelow (Eds.), Defining events: Power, resistance and identity in twenty-first-century Ireland (pp. 143–160). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
EAPN Ireland. (2011). Budget 2012 – Pre-budget submission. Dublin: EAPN Ireland.
Edsall, T. (2008, October 13). Global economic crisis likely to have profound consequences for US politics, world relations. Huffington Post. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/13/global-economiccrisis-li_n_134393.html
European Commission. (2010, December 30). Ireland memorandum of understanding on specific economic conditionality. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/articles/eu_economic_situation/pdf/2010-12-07-mou_en.pdf
European Commission. (2011, July 28). Ireland memorandum of understanding on specific economic conditionality. Second update. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://www.finance.gov.ie/sites/default/files/EUimfJul2011.pdf
European Commission. (2013a, June 3). Ireland memorandum of understanding on specific economic conditionality. Ninth update. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://www.finance.gov.ie/sites/default/files/moujun2013search.pdf
European Commission. (2013b, April). Ireland memorandum of understanding on specific economic conditionality. Eight update. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://www.finance.gov.ie/sites/default/files/mousearchmarch2013.pdf
Gilmore, E. (2013, June 28). Our task in EU is to build on what we have achieved. Irish Times.
Government of Ireland. (2008). Building Ireland’s smart economy: A framework for sustainable economic renewal. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Government of Ireland. (2010). The national plan for recovery 2011–2014. Dublin: Stationery Office.
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Hay, C. (2001). The ‘crisis’ of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: An ideational institutionalist approach. In J. Campbell & O. Pedersen (Eds.), The Rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis (pp. 193–218). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hay, C., Riiheläinen, J. M., Smith, N. J., & Watson, M. (2008). Ireland: The outlier inside. In K. Dyson (Ed.), The Euro at ten, Europeanization, power and convergence (pp. 182–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hemerijck, A. (2012). Two or three waves of welfare state transformation? In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state? (pp. 33–60). Bristol: The Policy Press.
IBEC. (2010). IBEC pre-budget submission 2010. Dublin: IBEC.
ICTU. (2009). Building Ireland’s smart economy. A framework for sustainable economic renewal. Preliminary observations by the Irish congress of trade unions. Dublin: ICTU.
IMF. (2013). Ireland IMF country report no. 13/93. Washington DC: IMF.
Kitchin, R., O’Callaghan, M., Boyle, M., Gleeson, J., & Keaveney, K. (2012). Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1302–1326.
Lenihan, B. (2008a, July 4). Government and the financial services sector Minister’s speech at PAI conference on financial regulation. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://www.finance.gov.ie
Lenihan, B. (2008b, October 14). Financial statement of the Minister for Finance Mr. Brian Lenihan, T.D. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://www.budget.gov.ie
Lenihan, B. (2009, December 9). Financial statement of the Minister for Finance Mr. Brian Lenihan, T.D. Retrieved October 20, 2013, http://www.budget.gov.ie
Mackintosh, J. (2013). Ireland: Poster child for austerity. Financial Times. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from http://blogs.ft.com/ft-long-short/2013/03/04/ireland-poster-child-for-austerity/
McCoy, D. (2008, June 25). Pay pause in public sector would be in national interest. Irish Times.
McCoy, D. (2010, April 16). Cost of banking crisis is a manageable burden. Irish Times.
McDonough, T., & Dundon, T. (2010). Thatcherism delayed? The Irish crisis and the paradox of social partnership. Industrial Relations Journal, 41(6), 544–562.
Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(2), 265–288.
Scharpf, F. W. (2013). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the disabling of democratic accountability. In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 26–58). Cambridge: Polity.
Schmidt, V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.
Schmidt, V., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, V., & Woll, C. (2013). The state: The bête noire of neo-liberalism or its greatest conquest? In V. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 112–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stiglitz, J. (2011, July 7). The ideological crisis of Western capitalism. Social Europe Journal. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://www.social-europe.eu/2011/07/the-ideological-crisis-of-western-capitalism/
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity – Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sweeney, P. (2009, January 31). What we need for recovery is a major Keynesian-style stimulus package. Irish Times.
Trichet, J.-C. (2010). ECB annual report for 2008 – Report on the 2009 annual statement on the Euro area and public finances (debate), European Parliament, Thursday, 25 March, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu
Weymes, L. (2012). Fiscal consolidation does it deliver? Dublin: Central Bank of Ireland. Economic Letter Series, 12(7), 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dukelow, F. (2016). ‘Pushing Against an Open Door’: Reinforcing the Neo-liberal Policy Paradigm in Ireland and the Impact of EU Intrusion. In: De La Porte, C., Heins, E. (eds) The Sovereign Debt Crisis, the EU and Welfare State Reform. Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58179-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58179-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58178-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58179-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)