Abstract
The chapter discusses the image of Mexico abroad in the context of the millennium development goals (MDGs) from 2000 to 2015. The author’s main argument is that nations not only engage in projects of development for reasons associated with improving their domestic social situation, but that they are also concerned with how they are viewed and measured by other nations. The “image component” of state development is understood as a way to project a country’s ways to identify with social and material progress, particularly in association with the MDGs, hence, the author will refer to “state image” throughout the text, except for circumstances in which it is more appropriate to talk about “nation image.” The case made in this chapter is that Mexico’s success in achieving most of the MDGs in due time is based on the fact that the country is clearly punching below its weight in international affairs and has also promoted a state image that does not correspond to the material development of its society, thus creating a dissonance with its own identity as an emerging country. Phrased differently, the situation is that of the Mexican government constructing public diplomacy to convey a misleading message to foreign audiences in relation to international commitments on domestic development that are too easy to fulfill for a nation like Mexico, which belongs to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Hence this chapter shows the country-image motivations that drive governments to misuse public relations and propaganda strategies instead of applying proper public diplomacy, in the name of advancing projects such as the MDGs, and their successors, the sustainable development goals (SDGs). If one is to take public diplomacy seriously, the challenge is to accept the use of data and communications under the rules of an open and democratic society. This stance assumes that it is necessary to address foreign audiences with all cards on the table, in recognition of the fact that in a global information world, data is always available and ready to be corroborated critically by peers and the interested public. A nation’s image, when used as a public diplomacy strategy by governments, must also be treated as a representation of an objective reality that can be verified by anyone else, and thus provide critical tools for aiding perception and understanding of the country, without the goal of necessarily being liked by others. In line with this reasoning, propaganda can no longer be an option for democratic governments committed to universal agendas, such as the MDGs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beith, Malcolm. 2011. Can Mexico Fix Its Image Problem? Foreign Policy, July 14. http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/07/14/can-mexico-fix-its-image-problem/. Accessed 9 Feb 2016.
Castañeda, Rodrigo, and Rebolledo, Cuauhtémoc. 2014. Country Note. Education at a Glance 2014. Paris: OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). http://www.oecd.org/edu/Mexico-EAG2014-Country-Note.pdf
CONEVAL (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social). 2014. Indicadores de acceso y uso efectivo de los servicios de salud de afiliados al Seguro Popular. Mexico City: CONEVAL. http://www.coneval.gob.mx/Informes/Evaluacion/Impacto/Acceso%20y%20Uso%20Efectivo.pdf
CONEVAL. 2015. CONEVAL informa los resultados de la medición de pobreza 2014. Press release 005, July 23. http://www.coneval.org.mx/SalaPrensa/Documents/Comunicado005_Medicion_pobreza_2014.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2016.
Cull, Nicholas. 2012. El futuro de la diplomacia pública: implicaciones para México. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior 96: 45–73.
Esquivel Hernández, Gerardo. 2015. Extreme Inequality in Mexico. Concentration of Economic and Political Power. Mexico City: Oxfam Mexico. http://cambialasreglas.org/images/inequality.pdf
Graham, Sarah E. 2014. Emotion and Public Diplomacy: Dispositions in International Communications, Dialogue, and Persuasion. International Studies Review 16(4): 522–539.
Hocking, Brian. 2008. Reconfiguring Public Diplomacy: From Competition to Collaboration. In Engagement: Public Diplomacy in a Globalised World, ed. Joylon Welsh, and Daniel Fearn, 62–75. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of Foreign Policy. Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. New York: Cornell University Press.
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2013. Panorama de violencia contra las mujeres en México ENDIREH 2011. Mexico City: INEGI. http://www.inegi.org.mx/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/estudios/sociodemografico/mujeresrural/2011/702825048327.pdf
Lozoya, Jorge Alberto. 1999. La nueva política mexicana de cooperación internacional. México, DF: SRE, UNDP, Instituto Mexicano de Cooperación Internacional, Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Maihold, Günther. 2014. BRICS, MIST, MIKTA: México entre poderes emergentes, potencias medias y responsabilidad global. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior 100: 63–79.
Melissen, Jan (ed). 2005. The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2015. How’s Life? 2015: Measuring Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/how_life-2015-en
Pamment, James. 2013. New Public Diplomacy in the 21st century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. New York: Routledge.
———. 2015. Sustainable Development Goals: The PD Opportunity of a Generation. CPD Blog. USC Public Diplomacy Center, September 9. http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/sustainable-development-goals-pd-opportunity-generation
Presidencia de la República. 2013. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013–2018. Mexico City: Office of the President. http://pnd.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/PND.pdf. Accessed 30 January 2016.
———. 2015. Los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio en México Informe de Avances 2015. México D.F.: Presidencia de la República. http://200.23.8.225/odm/Doctos/InfMex2015.pdf
Risse, Thomas. 2010. A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. New York: Cornell University Press.
Ruggie, John. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.
The Economist. 2015. The Two Mexicos. With its Combination of Modernity and Poverty. Mexico Provides Lessons for All Emerging Markets. The Economist, September 19.
UNICEF México (United Nations Children’s Fund Mexico). 2014. Salud y nutrición. El doble reto de la malnutrición y la obesidad. http://www.unicef.org/mexico/spanish/17047.htm. Accessed 9 Feb 2016.
Villanueva, César. 2016. La Imagen de México en el Mundo: 2006–2015. http://www.imagendemexico.com/
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Villanueva, C. (2017). The Image of Mexico Abroad in the Context of the Millennium Development Goals: Lessons for Public Diplomacy. In: Villanueva Ulfgard, R. (eds) Mexico and the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Governance, Development, and Social Inclusion in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58582-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58582-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59141-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58582-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)