Skip to main content

Introduction: “I Wish I Was a Bird”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transnational Family Communication
  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter follows the debates surrounding transnational family communication, with questions regarding the degree to which the ICTs bond families from afar. Two women’s stories represent the struggles all of the participants experienced in communicating with their families through ICTs. Each woman’s experience reflects the new female migration to the U.S.; one which is diverse rather than homogenous. They use ICTs in accordance with their gender but also their affordances to communicate. It becomes clear that their families’ sense of place and intimacy are destabilized. They reconstruct the family through their communication, which is embedded in ICTs and this has consequences for their relations, emotions, and identities. Terms are defined and problematized and the chapter ends with a summary of chapters.

My mother says, “daughter, how I wish I was a bird so I could fly.

back and forth!” (participant in this study).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. A. Agnew & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 313–330). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, F. (2013). Mexico: The new migration narrative. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/mexico-new-migration-narrative.

  • Altheide, L. D. (1994). An ecology of communication: Toward a mapping of the effective environment. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(4), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Immigration Council. (2015). New Americans in Washington. Retrieved from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/new_americans_in_washington_2015.pdf.

  • Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy: Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1905–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family Process, 50(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2014). Too sick to move: distant ‘crisis care in transnational families. International Review of Sociology, 24(39), 391–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2016). De-monizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 16(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, L. F., Neils, M., & Gomez, R. (2014). Crossing New Borders: Computers, Mobile Phones, Transportation, and English Language Among Hispanic Day Laborers in Seattle, Washington. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, D. A. (2012). Intimate migrations gender, family, and illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: NY Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, E. (2001). Social affordances of computer-mediated communication technology: Understanding adoption. In Proceedings From CHI EA’01, Extended abstracts on human factor in computing systems (pp. 67–68). ACM, New York: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.., & Lopez, M. H. (2013). Mapping the Latino population by state, country and city. Pew Research Center. Retrieved July 2, 2016, from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/08/29/mapping-the-latino-population-by-state-county-and-city/.

  • Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). Transnational families in the twenty-first century. In D. Bryceson & U. Vuorela (Eds.), The transnational family new European frontiers and global networks 3 (pp. 3–30). New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabanes, A. V. J., & Acedera, F. A. K. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media and society, 14, 916–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, J., Menjvar, C., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012). Central themes in the study of transnational parenthood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(2), 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., Fernanded-Ardevol, M., Jack, & Sey, A. (2009). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2010). Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1565–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Seattle. Department of Information and Technology. (2014). Information technology access and adoption in Seattle: Progress towards digital opportunity and equity. Retrieved from http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Tech/CofS_TechUse_r8single.pdf.

  • Cuban, S. (2013). Deskilling migrant women in the Global Care Industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreby, J. (2009). Gender and transnational gossip. Qualitative Sociology, 32(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erel, U. (2010). Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology, 44, 642–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan. L., Erel, U., & D’Angelo, A. (2015). Introduction: Understanding migrant capital. In L. Ryan, U. Erel, & A. D’ Angelo (Eds.). Migrant capital: Networks, identities, and strategies (pp. 3–17). Migration, Diaspora and Citizenship. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T., Fauser, M., & Reisenauer, E. (2013). Transnational migration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falicov, J. C. (2005). Emotional transnationalism and family identities. Family Process, 44(4), 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N., & Dreby, J. (2011). Relations between the generations in immigrant families. The Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 545–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunati, L. (1995). The arcane of reproduction: Housework, prostitution, labor and capital. New York: Automedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunati, L. (2007). Immaterial labor and its machinations. Ephemera, 7(1), 139–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunati, L. (2011). ICTs and immaterial labor from a feminist perspective. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35(4), 426–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, V. (2015). ‘The internet is magic’: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances (pp. 79–84). Cambridge: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2002). Cell phone technology and the challenges of absent presence, Swathmore, PA: Swarthmore College. Retrieved from http://www.swarthmore.edu/Documents/faculty/gergen/Cell_Phone_Technology.pdf.

  • Giddens, A. (1995). A contemporary critique of historical materialism: The nation-state and violence. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goulbourne, H., Reynolds, T., Solomos, J., & Zontini, E. (2010). Transnational families: Ethnicities identities and social capital. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, R. (2012). The distance between us: A memoir. New York: Atria Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford, D. (2015). Technologies of the spouse: Intimate surveillance in Senegalese transnational marriages. Global Networks, 15(1), 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, S. (2008). Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 585–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, G. N., & Foth, M. (2007). Communicative ecologies: Editorial preface. Electronic Journal of Communication, 17, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, J. (2012). Mobile specters of intimacy: A case study of women and mobile intimacy. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 37–60). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, S. & Yeoh, B. (2012). Sustaining Families across Transnational Spaces: Vietnamese Migrant Parents and their Left-Behind Children. Asian Studies Review 36, 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. S. (2007). Oaxacans like to work bent over: The naturalization of social suffering among berry farm worker. International Migration, 45(3). Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. S. (2012). The clinical gaze in the practice of migrant health: Mexican migrants in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 873–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2013). Fresh fruits, broken bodies migrant farmworkers in the United States. Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000). Feminism and migration. The ANNALS of the American Academy and Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in shadows of affluence. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (2003). “I am here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. In P. Hondagneu-Sotelo (Ed.), Gender and US immigration: Contemporary trends (pp. 317–340). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, H.A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks 6(2), 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (2015). Empowering or impeding return migration? ICT, mobile phones, and older migrants’ communication with home. Global Networks, 15(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2014). Status of women in the States: Spotlight on immigrant women. Retrieved from http://statusofwomendata.org/immigrant-women/.

  • IOM. (2011). Glossary on migration. In R. Perruchoud & J. Redpath-Cross (Eds.), Internationl Migration Law. Retrieved from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/sitios/Observaciones/11/Anexo5.pdf.

  • Jarrett, K. (2014). The relevance of “women’s work”: Social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. J. (2008). A Silent but Mighty River: The Costs of Women’s Economic Migration. Signs, 33(4), 761–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, G., Vacquero, E., & Goyette, K. (2013). Education and immigration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-O’riain, C. R. (2015). Emotional streaming and transconnectivity: Skype and emotion practices in transnational families in Ireland. Global Networks, 15(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E. (1999). Female birds of passage a decade later: Gender and immigration in the European Union. International Migration Review, 33(2), 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2005). Gains and loses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Compositions, 22, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasen, A. (2004). Affective technologies: Emotions and mobile phone. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/472410/Affective_Technologies._Emotions_and_Mobile_Phones.

  • Leach, L. (2016). Broadband Internet for economic growth in rural Washington: More please! Retrieved from http://thelens.news/2016/03/16/broadband-internet-economic-growth-rural-washington-please/.

  • Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holiday: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs, 12(3), 440–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. In A. Portes & J. Dewind (Eds.), Rethinking migration: New theoretical and empirical perspective (pp. 181–218). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscope. Society and Space, 22, 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interactions, 45(4), 399–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. (2013). Using Skype to mother: Bodies, emotions, visuality, and screens. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 664–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, H. M., Gonzalez-Barrerra, A. & Patten, E. (2013). Closing the digital divide: Latinos and technology adoption. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2013/03/Latinos_Social_Media_and_Mobile_Tech_03–2013_final.pdf.

  • Madianou, M. (2015). Digital inequality and second-order disasters: Social media in the typhoon haiyan recovery. Social Media + Society, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M. & Miller, D. (2011). Crafting love: Letters and cassette tapes in transnational Filipino family communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, J. S. (2001). Transnational relationships: The struggle to communicate across borders. Identities, 7(4), 583–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, S. J., & Pessar, P. R. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers brings gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 27–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, J. S., Chaudhri, M., & Patil, V. (2015). Scaling intersectionality: Advancing feminist analysis of transnational families. Sex Roles, 73, 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manjoo, F. (2016). For millions of immigrants, a common language: WhatsApp. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/21/technology/for-millions-of-immigrants-a-common-language-whatsapp.html?_r=0.

  • Mares, M. T. (2013). “Here we have the food bank”: Latino/a immigration and contradictions of emergency food. Food and Foodways, 21(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M., & Morawski, M. (2016). Comparison of sociodemographic characteristic of native-and foreign-born adults in King County, Washington. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/immigrants-and-wioa-services-comparison-sociodemographic-characteristics-native-and-foreign.

  • McKay, D. (2005). Migration and the sensuous geographies of re-emplacement in the Philippines. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckay, D. (2007). ‘Sending dollars shows feelings’—Emotions and economies in Filipino migration. Mobilities, 2, 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migration Policy Institute. (2014). State immigration data profiles. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/state-immigration-data-profiles.

  • Morgan, G. H. D. (2011). Locating ‘family practices’. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M. (1986). Birds of Passage are also Women. International Migration Review, 18(4), 886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muse-Orlinoff, L., & Fischer, L. P. (2010). Introduction. In W. A. Cornelius, D. FitzGerald, J. Hernandez-Diaz, & C. Borger (Eds.), Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A transnational community in Oaxaca and California (Ccis Anthologies). San Diego: Center for Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, UC San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, C. B. & Gomez, R. (2015). Informal networks, phones and Facebook: Information seeking and technology use by undocumented migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73434/123_ready.pdf?sequence=2.

  • Nielsen, K., Tiwari, A., Pasquini, D., Solorzano, L., & Wejebe, M. (2010). The family dynamics of Tunkaseno migration. In W. A. Cornelius, D. S. FitzGerald, P. L. Fischer, & L. Muse-orlinoff (Eds.), Mexican migration and the US economic crisis: A transnational perspective. San Diego: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, UC San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palackal, A., Mbatia, P. N., Dzorgbo, D. B., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Are mobile phones changing social networks? A longitudinal study of core networks in Kerala. New Media & Society, 13(3), 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parchoma, G., & Wright, S. (2011). Technologies for learning? An actor-network theory critique of affordances. Research on Mobile learning Research in Learning Technology, 19, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, E. (2015). Seattle is fourth-richest city in the U.S. Puget Sound Business Journal. November 5, 2015. Retrieved at: https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2015/11/seattle-is-fourth-richest-city-in-the-u-s.html.

  • Parrenas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27, 361–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrenas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gender woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrenas, R. S. (2008). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, M. A. (2015). The cosmopolitan dilemma: Fantasy, work and the experiences of Mexican au pairs in the USA. In R. Cox (Ed.), Au pairs’ lives in global context: Sisters or servants (pp. 310–334). Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center, U.S Census. (1960–2014). Statistical portrait of the foreign-born population in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-the-foreign-born-population-in-the-united-states-trends/.

  • Portes, A., Luis, E., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promises of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, J. (2017). Beyond $15: Immigrant workers: workers, Faith activists, nd the revival of the labor movement. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, A. G., Zong, J., & Batalova, J. (2015). Immigrant women in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrant-women-united-states.

  • Sandu, A. (2013). Transnational homemaking practices: Identity, belonging and informal learning. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(4), 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura, A. D., & Zavella, P. (2008). Introduction: Gendered borderlands. Gender & Society, 22, 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrbis, Z. (2008). Transnational families: Theorizing migration, emotions and belonging. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Page, D. (2015). U.S smartphone use in 2015. PewResearchCenter. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.

  • Thomas, M., & Lim, S. S. (2011). Migrant workers’ use of ICTs for interpersonal communication: The experience of female domestic workers in Singapore. In Communication and New Media Program, National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.media-anthropology.net/thomas_lim_migrant_workers_ICT.pdf.

  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods -Routledge advances in research method. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2004). Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 4(2), 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Research Review in Education, 34, 179–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians. (2012). How immigrants are capitalizing on new technology. Diaspora Digital, Retrieved from http://welcomingcenter.org/.

  • Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, Kristen, Boase, J., Carrasco, J., Cote, R., et al. (2005). Connected lives: The project. In P. Purcell (Ed.), Networked neighbor (pp. 1–50). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A., Laoire, C. N., Tyrell, N., & Carpena-Mendez, F. (2011). Children’s roles in transnational migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 37(8), 1159–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R. (2006). Virtual intimacies. Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, R. (2012). Bonds and bridges: Mobile phone use and social capital debates. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 127–150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactional Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., Amderson, K., & Dourish, P. (2008). Anchored mobilities. Mobile technology and transnational migration. Proceedings from the 7th ACM conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sondra Cuban .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuban, S. (2017). Introduction: “I Wish I Was a Bird”. In: Transnational Family Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58644-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58644-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58644-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics