Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Modern History ((SMH))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

Butterfield gradually reconciled himself to the reality that the technical and the expository could not be divorced in practice. In 1951 he had stated:

Unfortunately, the two kinds of history … one which seeks to resurrect the past and the one which examines the processes of time — can never be really separated without misfortune. On the one side … our analysis of the course of things may be defective if we have failed to reconstitute the historic moment in all its fullness. On the other side mere narration and description are in danger of being too intent on scenic display, too preoccupied with the mere surface of things …1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Review of Iggers, EHR 86 (1971), 338; cf. G. G. Iggers, The German Conception of History (1968), esp. pp. 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. H. Carr, What is History? (1961), pp. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ved Mehta, Fly and the Fly-Bottle (1963), p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas S. Kuhn, ‘The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research’, delivered 1961, published 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harold T. Parker, ‘Herbert Butterfield’, in Some 20th Century Historians: Essays on Eminent Europeans ed. S. W. Halperin (1961), pp. 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ved Mehta, ‘Onward and Upward with the Arts: The Flight of the Crook-Taloned Birds II’, The New Yorker 38 (15 December 1962), 120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ved Mehta, Fly and the Fly-Bottle (1963), p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William A. Speck, ‘Herbert Butterfield on the Christian and Historical Study’, FH 4 (1971), 64

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. W. Montgomery and James R. Moore, ‘The Speck in Butterfield’s Eye: A Reply to William A. Speck’, FH 4 (1971), 74–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Warwick Montgomery and James R. Moore’, FH 5 (1973), 107–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Hobart, ‘History and Religion in the Thought of Herbert Butterfield’, JHI 32 (1971), 553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See W. A. Speck, ‘Herbert Butterfield and the Legacy of a Christian Historian’, in A Christian View of History? ed. George Marsden and Frank Roberts (1975), p. 105; cf. HHR, p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Keith C. Sewell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sewell, K.C. (2005). Challenges and Resolutions. In: Herbert Butterfield and the Interpretation of History. Studies in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000933_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000933_13

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51978-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-00093-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics