Skip to main content

Research and Agency: The Case of Rural Women and Land Tenure in Tanzania

  • Chapter
Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change

Abstract

Women in Tanzania constitute the majority of smallholder farmers but due to the structure of the rural society and its related customary law, the majority of women have inferior and insecure land rights relative to men (United Republic of Tanzania [URT], 1995). Adult women with children but without a spouse, particularly in rural areas, face the greatest difficulty in handling the land problem. An increasing incidence of unwed mothers, widows, and divorcees makes this problem even more widespread that it has been in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1994). Foreword. In I. Scoones, & J. Thompson (Eds.), Beyond farmer first. London: Intermediate Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1995). The professionals and the powerless: Whose reality counts? Choices: The Human Development Magazine, 4(1). New York: United Nations Development Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1998). Afterword. In J. Holland, & J. Blackburn (Eds.), Whose voice? Participatory research and policy change. London: Intermediate Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversation on education and social change. In B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters (Eds.), We make the road by walking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1999). The conditions and consequences of choice: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2005). NGO partnerships and the taming of the grassroots in rural India. Development in Practice, 15(2), 210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, P. (1987). Doing Participatory research—a feminist approach. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manji, A. (1998). Gender and the politics of the land reform process in Tanzania. Journal of modern studies, 96(4), 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhina, C. H. (2005). Social learning for women’s empowerment in rural Tanzania. Unpublished dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyerere J. K. (1979). Adult education and development. In H. Hinzen, & V. H. Hundsdorfer (Eds.), The Tanzanian experience: Education for liberation and development. UNESCO Institute for Education, Hamburg: Evans Brothers London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, P. (1991). Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (1993), Voice of change. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. E. (2004). Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(3), 269–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema, M. (1990). Participatory action research: The “last temptation of saint” development. Alternatives, 15(2), 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. E. (1973). Small is beautiful. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, C., & Quan, J. (Eds.). (2000). Evolving land rights, policy and tenure in Africa. London: DFID/IIED/NRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1988). Our creative diversity: Report of the world commission on culture and development. Geneva: Oxford and India Book House.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Republic of Tanzania [URT]. (1995). Ministry of lands, housing and urban development: The national land policy. Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania: Printpak (Tanzania).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A, & Tsikata, D. (2003). Policy discourses on women’s land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The implications of the re-turn to the customary. In S. Razavi (Ed.), Agrarian change, gender and land rights (pp. 67–112). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Dip Kapoor Steven Jordan

Copyright information

© 2009 Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mhina, C.H. (2009). Research and Agency: The Case of Rural Women and Land Tenure in Tanzania. In: Kapoor, D., Jordan, S. (eds) Education, Participatory Action Research, and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100640_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics