Abstract
Scriptural Reasoning is many things. It is study, of course. We had expert teachers: Michael Signer on medieval exegetes, Kevin Hughes illuminating Bonaventura, Maria Dakake and Mahan Mirza patiently explaining the twists and turns of classical Qur’anic interpretation. Is there anything about the Talmud that Aryeh Cohen doesn’t know? And there were, of course, Robert Jenson’s laconic interventions: quick spanks of insight.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
There are three version of Piers Plowman that scholars label the A, B, and C versions. The C text is the final and longest version. The quotes are my modernizations of Langland’s archaic English as found in the edition of the C text prepared by Derek Pearsall, Piers Plowman by William Langland (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 Peter Ochs and William Stacy Johnson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reno, R.R. (2009). Lawe, loue, and lewete: The Kenotic Vision of Traditional Christian Political Theology. In: Ochs, P., Johnson, W.S. (eds) Crisis, Call, and Leadership in the Abrahamic Traditions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101357_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101357_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38097-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10135-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)