Skip to main content

Retooling Peace Philosophy: A Critical Look at Israel’s Separation Strategy

  • Chapter
Peace Philosophy in Action

Abstract

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a source of enduring tension in the Middle East. Its resolution would go a long way in creating a semblance of stability in this volatile region. Pitting occupant against occupied, Israel, as the foremost military power, holds the key to such resolution. Therefore the focus of this analysis will be on Israeli strategic thinking and policy making with regard to the Palestinian question.

“The significance of our disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process … It supplies the formaldehyde necessary so there is no political process with Palestinians. When you freeze the process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state … Effectively, this whole package called a Palestinian state, with all it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda.” (as cited in MacKinnon, 2004).

Dov Weisglass, aid to Ariel Sharon

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adwan, S & Bar-On, D. (2006). PRIME’s sharing the History Project: Palestinians and Israeli teachers and pupils learning each other’s narrative. In S. Mcoy-Levy (Ed.), Troublemakers or peacemakers? 217–234. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D. (2006). Tel your story: Creating dialogue between Jews and Germans, Palestinians and Israelis, 82–123. Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Living with the conflict: Socio-psychological of the Jewish Society in Israel, Jerusalem: Camel (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. & Salomon, G. (2006). Israeli-Jewish narratives of the Israeli-Palestinian’s conflict: Evolvement, contents, functions and consequences. In R.I. Rothberg (Ed), Israeli and Palestinian’s narratives of Conflict: History’s double helix, 19–46). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K.C. (2005). History and identity in pluralist democracies: Reflections on research in the U.S. and Northern Ireland. Canadian Social Studies 39(2). Retrieved October 1, 2007 from: http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/css/Css_39_2/ARBarton_pluralist_democracies.htm.

  • Barton, K.C. & Levstik, L.S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K.C. & McCully, A.W. (March 2006). Secondary students’ perspectives on school and community history in Northern Ireland. The European Social Science History Conference, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D., Eklund, J.H., Chermok, V.L., Hoyt. J.L., & Ortiz, B.G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekerman, Z. (2009). The complexities of teaching historical conflictual narratives in integrated Palestinians-Jewish schools in Israel, International Review of Education 55, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benvenisti, M. (1995). Intimate enemies: Jews and Arabs in a shared land, 198–199. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firer, R. (2008). Virtual peace education. Journal of Peace Education 5(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G. (1999). Truth and method (Second edition). Translated by J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I.M. (1999). Types of peace education. In Amira Raviv, Louis Oppenheimer, & Bar-Tal, Daniel (Eds.), How children understand war and peace: A call for international peace education, 299–317. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, R. & Leitch, R. (2004). Teachers’ and pupils’ educational experiences and school-based responses to the conflict in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues 60(2), 563–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leman, J. (1997). Undocumented migrants in Brussels: Diversity and the anthropology of illegality. New Community 23(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (2000). Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In P. Stearns, P. Siexas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives. pp. 63–82. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. (2000). Power relations in inter-group encounters: A case study of Jewish-Arab encounters in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 24(2), 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I.B., Bekerman, D.Z., & Jaber-Massarwa, S. (2004). Learning about “good enough” through “bad enough”: A story of a planned dialogue between Israeli Jews and the Palestinians. Humans Relations 57(9), 1075–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn, C. (2008). Negotiating cultural difference in divided societies: An analysis of approaches to integrated education in Northern Ireland. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, Z., & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education and post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 9–26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megill, A. (1979). Foucault structuralism and the ends of history. Journal of Modern History 51, 451–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mootz, F. (1988). The ontological basis of legal hermeneutics: A proposed model of inquiry based on the work of Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur. B.U.L Review 68, 523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, E. (2007). Recognition as preamble to reconciliation: A two narratives approach in a Palestinian—Israeli history textbook. Horizons Universities 3(4), 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niens, U. & Cairns, E. (2005). Conflict, contact, and education in Northern Ireland. Theory into Practice 44(4), 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Translated by J.B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naïve realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E.S. Reed, E. Turiel, & E. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge, 103–135. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouhana, N.N. & Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable ethno-national conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist 53, 761–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2000). Rashomon is not a Film. Panim 15(1) (Hebrew), 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2002). The Nature of peace education: Not all programs are created equal. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world, 3–13. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen die kinder! Or, does postmodern history have a place in the Schools? In P. Stearns, P. Siexas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives, 19–37. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsti, P. & Ahonen, S. (2008). Deliberative history classes for a post-conflict society, theoretical development and practical implication through international education in United World College in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education in post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 222–226. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnke, G. (1987). Cadamer Hermeneutics, tradition and reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yogev, E. (2007). Promoting understanding through teaching history. In P.A. Bartolo, A.M. Lous, & T. Hofsass (Eds.), Responding to student diversity: Teacher education and classroom practice, 295–314). Qawra: Malta University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelniker, T, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Peretz, H, Azaiza, F, Sharabany, R. (2008). Arab and Jewish Students’ participatory action research at the University of Haifa: A model for peace education. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education in post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 199–214. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Candice C. Carter Ravindra Kumar

Copyright information

© 2010 Candice C. Carter and Ravindra Kumar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petersen-Overton, K.J., Schmidt, J.D., Hersh, J. (2010). Retooling Peace Philosophy: A Critical Look at Israel’s Separation Strategy. In: Carter, C.C., Kumar, R. (eds) Peace Philosophy in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112995_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics