Abstract
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a source of enduring tension in the Middle East. Its resolution would go a long way in creating a semblance of stability in this volatile region. Pitting occupant against occupied, Israel, as the foremost military power, holds the key to such resolution. Therefore the focus of this analysis will be on Israeli strategic thinking and policy making with regard to the Palestinian question.
“The significance of our disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process … It supplies the formaldehyde necessary so there is no political process with Palestinians. When you freeze the process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state … Effectively, this whole package called a Palestinian state, with all it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda.” (as cited in MacKinnon, 2004).
Dov Weisglass, aid to Ariel Sharon
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adwan, S & Bar-On, D. (2006). PRIME’s sharing the History Project: Palestinians and Israeli teachers and pupils learning each other’s narrative. In S. Mcoy-Levy (Ed.), Troublemakers or peacemakers? 217–234. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Bar-On, D. (2006). Tel your story: Creating dialogue between Jews and Germans, Palestinians and Israelis, 82–123. Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press (Hebrew).
Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Living with the conflict: Socio-psychological of the Jewish Society in Israel, Jerusalem: Camel (Hebrew).
Bar-Tal, D. & Salomon, G. (2006). Israeli-Jewish narratives of the Israeli-Palestinian’s conflict: Evolvement, contents, functions and consequences. In R.I. Rothberg (Ed), Israeli and Palestinian’s narratives of Conflict: History’s double helix, 19–46). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Barton, K.C. (2005). History and identity in pluralist democracies: Reflections on research in the U.S. and Northern Ireland. Canadian Social Studies 39(2). Retrieved October 1, 2007 from: http://www.quasar.ualberta.ca/css/Css_39_2/ARBarton_pluralist_democracies.htm.
Barton, K.C. & Levstik, L.S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barton, K.C. & McCully, A.W. (March 2006). Secondary students’ perspectives on school and community history in Northern Ireland. The European Social Science History Conference, Amsterdam.
Batson, C.D., Eklund, J.H., Chermok, V.L., Hoyt. J.L., & Ortiz, B.G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(1), 65–74.
Bekerman, Z. (2009). The complexities of teaching historical conflictual narratives in integrated Palestinians-Jewish schools in Israel, International Review of Education 55, 235–250.
Benvenisti, M. (1995). Intimate enemies: Jews and Arabs in a shared land, 198–199. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Firer, R. (2008). Virtual peace education. Journal of Peace Education 5(2), 193–207.
Gadamer, H.G. (1999). Truth and method (Second edition). Translated by J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall. New York: Continuum.
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harris, I.M. (1999). Types of peace education. In Amira Raviv, Louis Oppenheimer, & Bar-Tal, Daniel (Eds.), How children understand war and peace: A call for international peace education, 299–317. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kilpatrick, R. & Leitch, R. (2004). Teachers’ and pupils’ educational experiences and school-based responses to the conflict in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues 60(2), 563–586.
Leman, J. (1997). Undocumented migrants in Brussels: Diversity and the anthropology of illegality. New Community 23(1), 25–41.
Lowenthal, D. (2000). Dilemmas and delights of learning history. In P. Stearns, P. Siexas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives. pp. 63–82. New York: New York University Press.
Maoz, I. (2000). Power relations in inter-group encounters: A case study of Jewish-Arab encounters in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 24(2), 259–277.
Maoz, I.B., Bekerman, D.Z., & Jaber-Massarwa, S. (2004). Learning about “good enough” through “bad enough”: A story of a planned dialogue between Israeli Jews and the Palestinians. Humans Relations 57(9), 1075–1101.
Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGlynn, C. (2008). Negotiating cultural difference in divided societies: An analysis of approaches to integrated education in Northern Ireland. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, Z., & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education and post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 9–26. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Megill, A. (1979). Foucault structuralism and the ends of history. Journal of Modern History 51, 451–505.
Mootz, F. (1988). The ontological basis of legal hermeneutics: A proposed model of inquiry based on the work of Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur. B.U.L Review 68, 523.
Naveh, E. (2007). Recognition as preamble to reconciliation: A two narratives approach in a Palestinian—Israeli history textbook. Horizons Universities 3(4), 173–188.
Niens, U. & Cairns, E. (2005). Conflict, contact, and education in Northern Ireland. Theory into Practice 44(4), 337–344.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Translated by J.B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naïve realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E.S. Reed, E. Turiel, & E. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge, 103–135. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rouhana, N.N. & Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable ethno-national conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist 53, 761–774.
Salomon, G. (2000). Rashomon is not a Film. Panim 15(1) (Hebrew), 41–42.
Salomon, G. (2002). The Nature of peace education: Not all programs are created equal. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world, 3–13. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen die kinder! Or, does postmodern history have a place in the Schools? In P. Stearns, P. Siexas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives, 19–37. New York: New York University Press.
Torsti, P. & Ahonen, S. (2008). Deliberative history classes for a post-conflict society, theoretical development and practical implication through international education in United World College in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education in post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 222–226. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Warnke, G. (1987). Cadamer Hermeneutics, tradition and reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Yogev, E. (2007). Promoting understanding through teaching history. In P.A. Bartolo, A.M. Lous, & T. Hofsass (Eds.), Responding to student diversity: Teacher education and classroom practice, 295–314). Qawra: Malta University.
Zelniker, T, Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Peretz, H, Azaiza, F, Sharabany, R. (2008). Arab and Jewish Students’ participatory action research at the University of Haifa: A model for peace education. In C. McGlynn, M. Zemblas, Z. Bekerman, & A. Gallgher (Eds.), Peace education in post-conflict societies: Comparative perspectives, 199–214. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Candice C. Carter and Ravindra Kumar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petersen-Overton, K.J., Schmidt, J.D., Hersh, J. (2010). Retooling Peace Philosophy: A Critical Look at Israel’s Separation Strategy. In: Carter, C.C., Kumar, R. (eds) Peace Philosophy in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112995_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230112995_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38415-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11299-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)