Skip to main content

Integrating Digital Technologies in Education: A Model for Negotiating Change and Resistance to Change

  • Chapter
Digital Education

Abstract

The integration of learning technologies in educational institutions is a complex process and presents stakeholders with potential opportunities as well as significant points of resistance. Understanding this process is crucial in the age of digital education, as without the active involvement of educational managers, teacher trainers, curriculum coordinators, and administrators there is a high risk that new digital technologies will stay in the hands of a few core enthusiasts or “missioners” (Miller & Glover, 2010) and potentially marginalize nonparticipants rather than engage them in meaningful ways. There is also a danger that the technologies and the gains made from deploying these technologies may disappear again when those core enthusiasts change roles or organizations. The high turnover of trends, technologies, and ideas in information and communication technology (ICT) is one reason why they generate both excitement and skepticism in almost equal measure. Learning technologies is a constantly moving area with new applications appearing with high frequency and significant barriers to integration, both intrinsic and extrinsic, exist. The main factors in terms of instructors include “lack of confidence, lack of competence, and lack of access to resources” (Bingimlas, 2009, p. 243).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, A. (2007). Simplify your life—Die Infantilisierung der gesellschaftlichen Lernräume und die Vermüllung des Bewusstseins als pädagogische Herausforderungen. In D. Kirchhöfer & G. Steffens (Ed.), Infantilisierung des Lernens?—Neue Lernkulturen—ein Streitfall (pp. 59–73). Frankfurt: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacaci, A. (2006). Change management—Widerstande gegen Wandel Plädoyer für ein System der Prävention. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEDFOP — European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2008). The shift to learning outcomes—Conceptual, political and practical developments in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppier K., & Lauterburg C. (2005). Change management—Den Unternehmenswandel gestalten. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECDL Foundation (2010). Website. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.ecdl.org

  • European Commission (2010). The European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc50_en.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, M., & Gscheidle, C. (2008). Mitmachnetz Web 2.0: Rege Beteiligung nur in Communities. Media Perspektiven 7/2008. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.daserste.de/service/studie08_4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonella, L., & Pantò, E. (2008). Didactic architectures and organization models: A process of mutual adaptation. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/medial5973.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, T. (2007). Portfolio: ein Entwicklungsinstrument für selbstbestimmtes Lernen. Eine explorative Studie zur Arbeit mit Portfolios in der Sekundarstufe 1. Hohengehren: Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honegger, B. D. (2009). Willkommen in Beats Biblionetz!. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://beat.doebe.li/bibliothek/w00497.html

    Google Scholar 

  • JISC (2008). Great expectations of LCT: How higher education institutions are measuring up. Research Study Conducted for the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/research/2008/greatexpectations.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Kil, M. (2003). Organisationsveränderungen in Weiterbildungseinrichtungen: Empirische Analysen und Ansatzpunkte für Entwicklung und Forschung. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhöfer, D. (2004). Lernkultur Kompetenzentwicklung: Begriffliche Grundlagen. Berlin: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Betriebliche Weiterbildungsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhöfer, D. (2007). Neue Lernkultur und Infantilisierung. In D. Kirchhöfer & G. Steffens (Eds.), Lnfantilisierung des Lernens?—Neue Lernkulturen—ein Streitfall (pp. 17–42). Frankfurt: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. (2000). Das Regenmacher-Phänomen: Widersprüche und Aberglaube im Konzept lernender Organization. Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C, & Knobel, M. (2007). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Frankfurt: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediascope Europe (2008). EIAA Mediascope Europe 2008: Executive summary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://eiaa.net/Ftp/casestudiesppt/EIAA_Mediascope_Europe_2008_PanEuropean_Executive_Summary.pdf

  • Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: A literature survey. In M. Thomas & E. Cutrim Schmid (Eds.), Interactive whiteboards for education: Theory, research and practice. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J. (2006). Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.usek.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html O’Reilly T. (2005). What is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.oreilly.de/artikel/web20.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, N. K. (2004). The quality dilemma of online-education. In A. Terry & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 385–409). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redecker, C. (2009). Review of learning 2.0 practices: Study on the impact of Web 2.0 innovation son education and training in Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC49108.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Reputation Defender (2010). Website. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.reputationdefender.com/?lang=en Rheingold, H. (2000). Community development in the cybersociety of the future. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 170–178). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulmeister, R. (2008). Gibt es eine »Net Generation«? Work in Progress. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.zhw.uni-hamburg.de/pdfs/Schulmeister_Netzgeneration.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Schawbel, D. (2009). Me 2.0: Build a powerful brand to achieve career success. New York, NY: Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. In International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance learning, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/Jan_05.pdf#page=7.

  • Sindler, A. (2004). Etablierung einer neuen Lernkultur—Modelle medienbasierter Lernarrangements zur Förderung selbstregulierten Lernens im Kontext der Organization. Wien: Lit-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stang, R. (2003). Neue Medien in Organizationen der Weiterbildung—Empirische Befunde am Beispiel der Volkshochschulen, online (DIE). In E. Nuissl,

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Schiersmann & H. Siebert (Eds.) Erfahrungen mit Neuen Medien. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the Net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W (2006). The principles of scientific management. New York: Cosimo. Thiel, H-U. (2000). Widerstand gegen Veränderungen in Supervision und Organizationsberatung. In H. Pühl (Ed.), Supervision und Organizationsen-twicklung, (pp. 228–245). Wiesbaden: VS, Verlag für Sozialwiss.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: Implementation guidelines, Version 1.0. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://cst.unesco-ci.org/sites/projects/cst/The%20Standards/ICT-CSTImplementation%20Guidelines.pdf

  • VITAE Project Page (2008). We want to empower vocational teachers to mentor their students and colleagues to work competently in the digital world. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.vitae-project.eu

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael Thomas

Copyright information

© 2011 Michael Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berger, T., Thomas, M. (2011). Integrating Digital Technologies in Education: A Model for Negotiating Change and Resistance to Change. In: Thomas, M. (eds) Digital Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118003_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics