Skip to main content

Activity, Activity Theory, and the Marxian Legacy

  • Chapter
Marxism and Education

Part of the book series: Marxism and Education ((MAED))

  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

How should Marxists approach the analysis, critique, and transformation of social practices and institutions (including education) within capitalist societies today? What theoretical tools do we need for this task and what should be our starting point? It is these fundamental theoretical and methodological issues that are the subject of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avis, J. (2007) Engeström’s Version of Activity Theory: A Conservative Praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20 (3): 161–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhurst, D. (2009) Reflections on Activity Theory. Educational Review, 61 (2): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V.V. (1990) Types of Generalization in Instruction (Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research (Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1990) Learning, Working and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory (Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1991) Non Scolae Sed Vitae Discimus: Toward Overcoming the Encapsulation of School Learning. Learning and Instruction (1): 243–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (eds.) (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. and Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R.-L. Punamäki (eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s “Capital” (Moscow: Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. E. (2009) Breaking Away from “Capital”? Theorising Activity in the Shadow of Marx. Outlines, 1: 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.E. (in press, 2011) Issues of Life and Death in Education. Commentary on Julian Williams. Mind, Culture and Activity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A.N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1909). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume Three (Chicago, IL: Charles H Kerr & Co).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976a). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976b). Value: Studies by Marx (London: New Park Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mészáros, I. (1970). Marx’s Theory of Alienation (London: Merlin Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R. (2000). Ascending from the Abstract to the Concrete and Constructing a Working Hypothesis for New Practices. In V. Oittinen (ed.) Evald Ilyenkov’s Philosophy Revisited, 111–29 (Helsinki: Kikimora Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilling, G. (1980) Marx‘s “Capital”: Philosophy and Political Economy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, D. (1987) The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1999) Marx at the Millennium (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1990) The Logic of Marx’s Capital (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12 (1): 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toiviainen, H. and Y. Engeström. (2009) Expansive Learning in and for Work. In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, and J. Porter (eds.) Knowledge, Values and Educational Policy: A Critical Perspective, 95–109 (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi-Gröhn, T., and Y. Engeström. (2003) Conceptualizing Transfer: From Standard Notions to Developmental Perspectives. In Tuomi-Gröhn, T. and Y. Engeström (eds.) Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary Crossing, 19–38 (Amsterdam: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmington, P. (2008). From “Activity” to “Labour”: Commodification, Labour Power and Contradiction in Engeström’s Activity Theory. Critical Social Studies—Outlines, 2: 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Peter E. Jones

Copyright information

© 2011 Peter E. Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, P.E. (2011). Activity, Activity Theory, and the Marxian Legacy. In: Jones, P.E. (eds) Marxism and Education. Marxism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119864_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics