Abstract
Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are still a disregarded species in social science. This may be explained by the ‘long shadow’ of Fordism, which raised the expectation that large vertically integrated conglomerates would eliminate the SME sector, especially in manufacturing. In contrast to large firms, SMEs have little power to shape the institutional and market environment. The lack of scholarly interest might also be caused by the cultural distance to the patriarchal-authoritarian leadership style that used to be widespread in family firms, as well as by the difficult access for academic researchers to this type of enterprise. The latter has partly to do with the limited available time of small management staffs in SMEs, and partly with owner desires to control the information flow going outside the firm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amable, B. (2003) Diversity of Modern Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Becker, K., K. Bluhm and B. Martens (2008) ‘Unternehmensführung in den Zeiten des “Shareholder Value”: Zum Wandel des industriellen Mittelstands’, in R. Benthin and U. Brinkmann (eds), Unternehmenskultur und Mitbestimmung (Frankfurt/Main, New York: Campus), 215–244.
Cosh, A. and A. Hughes (2003) ‘Enterprise Challenged: Policy and Performance in the British SME Sector 1999–2003’, CBR Small Business Survey Research Report (Cambridge: Centre for Business Research).
Crouch, C. (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1991) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality’, in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism and Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago), 63–8.
Hancké, B., M. Rhodes and M. Thachter (2007) ‘Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism’, in Hancké, B., M. Rhodes and M. Thachter (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in European Economy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–38.
Hall, P. A. and D. Soskice (2001) ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press). 1–70.
Herrigel, G. (1996) Industrial Constructions. The Sources of German Industrial Power. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lane, C. and S. Quack (2002) ‘How Banks Construct and Manage Risk: A Sociological Study of Small Firm Lending in Britain and Germany’, WZB Discussion Paper, FS I 02–101 (Berlin: Social Science Research Center Berlin).
Locke, R. (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy Work (New York: Cornell University Press).
Martens, B. and R. Schmidt (2003) ‘Aufgaben zwischen Betriebswirtschaftlichem Service und Strategischer Unternehmensteuerung’, Ergebnisse einer Mitgliederbefragung des Internationalen Controller Vereins, Jena.
Martens, B. and Michailow, M. (2006) ‘Wandel und Kontinuität Mittelständischer Unternehmen — Eine Untersuchung zu Differenzen zwischen und Gemeinsamkeiten von Unternehmensleitern’, Zeitschrift für KMU & Entrepreneurship, 54, 221–42.
Molina, Ó. and M. Rhodes (2007) ‘The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy’, in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes and M. Thachter (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 223–52.
Mullineux, A. (1994) ‘Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (SME) Financing in the UK: Lessons from Germany’, Discussion Paper (London: Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society).
Mullineux, A. and E. Terberger (2006) The British Bank Sector a Good Role Model for Germany? (London: Anglo-German Foundation of the Study of Industrial Society).
Observatory Network of European SMEs(2003) ‘SME and Access to Finance’, no. 2, European Commission, <http://www.insme.org/documenti/smes_observatory2003_report2_en.pdf>.
Schröter, H. G. (2004) ‘Zur Geschichte der Marktforschung in Europa im 20. Jahrhundert’, in R. Walter (ed.), Geschichte des Konsums (Stuttgart: Steiner), 319–41.
Schröter, H. G. (2005) Americanization of the European Economy. A Compact Survey of American Economic Influence in Europe since the 1880s (Dordrecht: Springer).
Sorge, A. (2005) The Global and the Local. Understanding the Dialectics of Business Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Soskice, D. (1999) ‘Divergent Production Regimes. Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s’, in H. Kitschelt, P. Lange, G. Marks and J. D. Stephens (eds), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 101–34.
Soskice, D. (2000) ‘Explainrng Changes in Institutional Frameworks. Societal Patterns of Business Coordination’, in M. Maurice and A. Sorge (eds), Embedding Organizations. Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context (Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing), 167–84.
Vitols, S. (2004) ‘Changes in Germany’s Bank-Based Financial System: A Varieties of Capitalism Perspective’, WZB Discussion Paper, SP II 2004–03 (Berlin: WZB).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Katharina Bluhm and Rudi Schmidt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bluhm, K., Schmidt, R. (2008). Why Should the Varieties Literature Grant Smaller Firms More Attention? An Introduction. In: Bluhm, K., Schmidt, R. (eds) Change in SMEs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227781_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227781_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35416-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22778-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)