Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Rethinking International Development Series ((RID))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

In light of the expansion of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to and from Least Developed Countries (LDCs), what is happening to policy? Over the last few years a range of countries have enacted policy measures less favourable to FDI. In 2005 (and repeated in 2006) around one in five FDI policy changes were less favourable to FDI. In contrast, in the mid 1990s, one (or two) in a hundred policy changes were less favourable to FDI. As UNCTAD noted,

the year 2005 saw intense discussions in many parts of the world on the merits of liberalisation versus the need for economic protection. Most countries continued to liberalise their investment environments but others took steps to protect their economies from foreign competition or to increase state influence in certain industries … While policy changes that were more favourable to FDI dominated in 2005, the number of changes making a host country less welcoming to FDI was the highest ever recorded by UNCTAD. (2006: 23, 25)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agenor R. 2002. Does Globalisation Hurt the Poor? Mimeograph. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosin M.R. and Mayer R. 2000. Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 146. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro L., Chanda A., Kalmli-Ozcan S. and Sayek S. 2004. FDI and Economic Growth: the Role of Local Financial Markets. Journal of International Economics. 64 (1): 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L. et al. 2005. Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Pratice: Promises and Limits. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 28 (5): 226–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aykut D. and Ratha D. 2003. South-South FDI Flows: How Big Are They? Transnational Corporations. 13 (1): 149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam V., Salisu M. and Sapsford D. 1996. Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries. The Economic Journal. 106 (434): 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam V., Salisu M. and Sapsford D. 1999. Foreign Direct Investment as an Engine of Growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 8(1) March: 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomstrom M. and Kokko A. 1994. Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys. 12 (3): 247–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein E., De Gregorio J. and Lee J.-W. 1998. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Growth? Journal of International Economics. 45 (1): 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth B. and Collins S. 1999. Capital Flows to Developing Economies: Implications for Saving and Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton C. and Volger J. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd ed. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock K. and McGee R. 2004. Mapping Trade Policy: Understanding the Challenges of Civil Society Participation. IDS Working Paper 225. IDS: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse K., Mays N. and Walt G. 2005. Making Health Policy. Open University Press: Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carkovic M. and Levine R. 2005. Does Foreign Direct Investment Accelerate Economic Growth? In Moran T.H., Graham E.M. Eds. Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development. University of Minnesota, Department of Finance Working Paper: Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court J. and Cotterrell L. 2004. What Political and Institutional Context Issues Matter for Bridging Research and Policy? A Literature Review and Discussion of Data Collection Approaches. ODI Working Paper Number 269. ODI: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court J., Hovland I. and Young J. 2005. Bridging Research and Policy in International Development: Evidence and the Changing Process. Intermediate Technology Development Group: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Court J. and Young J. 2003. Bridging Research and Policy: Insights From 50 Case Studies. ODI Working Paper Number 213. ODI: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe E. and Young J. 2002. Bridging Research and Policy: Context, Evidence And Links. ODI Working Paper Number 173. ODI: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P., Nutley S. and Walter I. 2005. Assessing the Impact of Social Science Research: Conceptual, Methodological and Practical Issues. Mimeograph. Research Unit for Research Utilisation. School of Management, University of St Andrew.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mello L. 1997. Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: a Selective Survey. The Journal of Development Studies. 34 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello L. 1999. Foreign Direct Investment-Led Growth: Evidence from Time Series and Panel Data. Oxford Economic Papers. 51 (1): 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D. and Kraay A. 2001. Trade, Growth and Poverty. Economic Journal. 114 (493): 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A. 1976. Social Problems. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M. 2000. Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Abacus: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H. and Rand J. 2006. On the Causal Links between FDI and Growth in Developing Countries. World Economy. 29 (1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson G. 2001. Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment? G24 Discussion Paper Series. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzer D., Klasen S., and Nowak-Lehmann F. 2006. In Search of FDI-Led Growth in Developing Countries. Ibero America Institute for Economic Research (Iai) Discussion Paper Number 150. Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research: Gottingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand M., Simon J. and Hyder A. 2000. The Role of Research in Child Health Policy and Programs in Pakistan. in: Lessons in Research to Action and Policy: Case Studies from Seven Countries COHRED Working Group on Research to Action and Policy: Geneva. The Council on Health Research for Development: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill C. and Smith M. Eds. 2005. International Relations and the European Union . Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood B. and Gunn L. 1984. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes T. and Scoones I. 2000. Participatory Environmental Policy Processes: Experiences from North and South. IDS Working Paper 113. IDS: Brighton. IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). 2001. Rural Poverty Report: The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty. IFAD: Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A. ed. 2005. Environmental Policy in the European Union: Actors, Institutions and Processes. Earthscan: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley J. and Scoones I. 1999. Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: A Review. IDS Working Paper 89. IDS: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley J. and Scoones I. 2001. Knowledge, Power and Politics: the Environmental Policymaking Process in Ethiopia. Journal of Modern African Studies. 38 (1): 98–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley J. and Scoones I. 2003. Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa. Earthscan: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNOTS (Knowledge, Technology and Society Group, IDS). 2006. Understanding Policy Processes: A Review of IDS Research on the Environment. IDS: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korbin S. 2005. The Determinants of Liberalisation of FDI Policy in Developing Countries: a Cross-Sectional Analysis, 1992–2001. Transnational Corporations. 14 (1): 67–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N. and Pradhan J. 2002. Foreign direct investment, externalities and economic growth in developing countries. Research and Information System for the Non-aligned and other developing countries: RIS Discussion Paper 27. RIS: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavis J. et al. 2002. Examining the Role of Health Services Research in Public Policymaking. Milbank Quarterly. 80: 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach M., Scoones I. and Wynne B. 2005. Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. Zed Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lensink R. and Morrissey O. 2001. Foreign Direct Investment: Flows, Volatility and Growth. Paper Prepared for Development Economics Study Group Conference. University of Nottingham. April 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom C. 1979. Still Muddling, Not Yet through. Public Administration Review. 39: 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer J. 2006. Policy Coherence for Development: A background Paper on Foreign Direct Investment. OECD Working Paper Number 253. OECD: Paris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B. 2002. Can We Discern The Effect of Globalisation on Income Distribution? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodley J. and Jacobs M. 2000. Research to Action and Policy: Combating Vitamin a Deficiencies in South Africa. in: Lessons in Research to Action and Policy — Case Studies from Seven Countries (Edited by: COHRED Working Group on Research to Action and Policy. The Council on Health Research for Development: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisset J. and Pirnia N. 2001. How Tax Policy and Incentives Affect Foreign Direct Investment: a Review. In Wells L., Allen N., Morisset J., and Pirnia N. Eds. Using Tax Incentives to Compete for Foreign Direct Investment: Are They Worth the Costs? Foreign Investment Advisory Service: Washington, DC. 69–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair-Reichert U. and Weinhold D. 2001. Causality Tests for Cross-Country Panels: New Look at Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in LDCS. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2: 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnenkamp P. and Spatz J. 2004. FDI and Economic Growth in Developing Economies: How Relevant Are Host-Economy Characteristics? Transnational Corporations. 13 (1): 53–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson J. and Shackleton M. Eds. 2006. The Institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter R. and Prysor-Jones S. 1998. Making a Difference to Policies and Programmes: a Guide for Researchers. Monograph Series 1. ECAPAPA: Entebbe, Uganda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisen H. Soto M. 2001. Which Types of Capital Inflow Foster Developing Country Growth? International Finance. 4 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli E. and Figini P. 2003. Does Globalisation Reduce Poverty? Some Empirical Evidence for Developing Countries. Paper Prepared for UNU WIDER Conference. Inequality, Poverty and Human Well-being. Helsinki, May 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto M. 2000. Capital Flows and Growth in Developing Countries: Recent Empirical Evidence. Organisation of Cooperation and Development (OECD) Development Centre Technical Paper No. 160. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stone D., Maxwell M. and Keating M. 2001. Bridging Research and Policy. Paper Presented at DFID Workshop. Warwick University: UK. 16–17 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surr M., Barnett A., Duncan, A., Speight M., Bradley D., Rew A. and Toye J. 2002. Research for Poverty Reduction. Department for International Development (DFID) Research Policy Paper. DFID: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe S. and Court J. 2005. A Toolkit for Progressive Policymakers. ODI: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton R. 1999. The Policy Process: An Overview. ODI: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J. and Grindle M. 1990. After the Decision: Implementing Policy Reforms in Developing Countries. World Development. 18: 1163–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trostle J., Bronfman M. and Langer A. 1999. How Do Researchers Influence Decision Makers? Case Studies of Mexican Policies. Health Policy and Planning. 14: 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 1991. World Investment Report: The Triad in Foreign Direct Investment. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1992. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations as Engines of Growth. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1994. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations, Employment and the Workplace. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1997. World Investment Report: Trends and Determinants. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1998. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations, Market Structure and Competition Policy. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1999a. Transfer Pricing. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 1999b. World Investment Report: FDI and the Challenge of Development. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2000. World Investment Report: Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2001. World Investment Report: Promoting Linkages. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2002. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2003. World Investment Report: Foreign Direct Investment Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2004. World Investment Report: The Shift Towards Services. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2005. World Investment Report: TNCs and the Internationalisation of R and D. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2006. World Investment Report: FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. UNCTAD: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman L. 2005. Environment, Politics and Poverty: A Review of PRSP Stakeholder Perspectives. IDS: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace H. and Wallace W. Eds. 2000. Policy-Making in the European Union. (4th edition). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace H., Wallace W. and Pollack M. Eds. 2005. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt G. 1984. Health Policy: An Introduction to Process and Power. Zed Books: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A. 1980. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Macmillan: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2004. Global Development Finance. World Bank: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka J. 2006. Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Andy Sumner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sumner, A. (2009). How TNC-Friendly Is Development Policy?. In: Rugraff, E., Sánchez-Ancochea, D., Sumner, A. (eds) Transnational Corporations and Development Policy. Rethinking International Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228412_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics