Abstract
Institutions are the building blocks of social order; they shape, govern and legitimize behaviour. Not only do they embody social values but they also reflect historical compromises between social groups negotiated by key actors. It thus comes as no surprise to find major differences in the institutional arrangements of today’s capitalist societies. These differences apply especially to employment institutions, which shape the exchange of human labour. Employment contracts are necessarily incomplete contracts, since the actual performance required and rewards offered are constantly subject to new decisions after the contract has been initiated. To put some limits on this uncertainty, institutions, both formal and informal, have been established to influence not only the contractual conditions but also the rights of employees or their representatives to engage in some shared determination of their working conditions and the organization of the work process. The employment relationship is also a pivotal institution in economic systems, with consequences as much for social and family organization as for the production system. It not only shapes the terms under which labour is supplied to and utilized within firms, but also underpins systems of social stratification and determines standards of living. Furthermore, as welfare states have developed and provided support for citizens not in employment, so the employment relationship has become integrated into welfare arrangements, with time spent in an employment relationship often the basis for accumulated entitlements to benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amable, B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford/New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
Anxo, D. and Fagan, C. (2005), ‘The Family, the State and Now the Market — the organisation of Employment and Working-time in Home Care Services for the Elderly’, pp. 173–222 in G. Bosch and S. Lehndorff (eds), Working in the Service Sector — A Tale from Different Worlds, London/New York: Routledge.
Auer, P. (2000), Employment Revival in Europe: Labour Market Success in Austria, Denmark, Ireland and the Netherlands, ILO, Geneva.
Baumol, W. J. (1967), ‘Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis’, American Economic Review 57: 416–26.
Bettio, F. and Villa, P. (1998), ‘A Mediterranean Perspective on the Breakdown of the Relationship between Participation and Fertility’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 22 (1998): 137–71.
Bosch, G. and Kalina, T. (2008), ‘Low-wage Work in Germany: An Overview’, pp. 19–112 in G. Bosch and C. Weinkopf (eds), Low-wage Work in Germany, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bosch, G. and Wagner, A. (2005), ‘Why Do Countries Have Such Different Service-sector Employment Rates?’, pp. 74–102 in G. Bosch and S. Lehndorff (eds), Working in the Service Sector — A Tale from Different Worlds, London/New York: Routledge.
Bosch, G., Rubery, J. and Lehndorff, S. (2007), ‘European Employment Models under Pressure to Change’, International Labour Review 146 (2007): 253–77.
Campbell, J. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
Coates, D. (2000), Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Coates, D. (ed.) (2005), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2007), ‘Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security-COM’ (2007), 359 final 27 June. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/employment_analysis/eie/com_2007_359_en.pdf.
Conway, P., Janod, V. and Nicoletti, G. (2005), ‘Product Market Regulation in OECD Countries: 1998 to 2003’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 419, 1 April 2005, http://www.oecd.org/eco.
Conway, P. and Nicoletti, G. (2006), ‘Product Market Regulation in the Non-manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 530, 7 December 2006, http://www.oecd.org/eco.
Crouch, C. (2005), Die Bedeutung von Governance für Vielfalt und Wandel im modernen Kapitalismus’, pp. 101–26 in M. Miller (ed.), Welten des Kapitalismus. Institutionelle Alternativen in der globalisierten Ökonomie, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
Crouch, C. and Farrell, H. (2002), ‘Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 5/2002, Köln: MaxPlanck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Crouch, C. and Keune, M. (2005), ‘Changing Dominant Practice: Making Use of Institutional Diversity in Hungary and the UK’, pp. 83–102 in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebbinghaus, B. (1999), ‘Does a European Social Model Exist and Can it Survive?’, pp. 1–26 in G. Huemer, M. Mesch and F. Traxler (eds), The Role of Employer Associations and Labour Unions in the EMU, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Eichengreen, B. (2007), The European Economy since 1945: Coordinated Capitalism and Beyond, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
EIRO (2008), ‘Unions Fear ECJ Ruling in Laval Case Could Lead to Social Dumping’, European Industrial Relations Observatory, online: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2008/01/articles/eu0801019i.htm.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
European Commission (2004), ‘Industrial Relations in Europe’, Luxembourg.
European Commission (2007), ‘Employment in Europe 2006’, Luxembourg.
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.
Finegold, D. and Soskice, D. (1988), ‘The Failure of Training in Britain: Analysis and Prescription’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy Autumn 1988: 21–51
Fulcher, J. (2005), ‘Capitalisms’, Work, Employment and Society 19 (1): 177–92.
Hall, P. A. (2007), ‘The Evolution of Varieties of Capitalism in Europe’ pp. 39–85 in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradiction and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. A. and Gingerich, D. W. (2004), ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy. An Empirical Analysis’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 5/2004, Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, pp. 1–71 in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. (2007), ‘Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism’, pp. 3–38 in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradiction, and Complementarities in the European Economy, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hermans, S. (2005), ‘The Social Agenda of the European Union and the Modernisation of the European Social Model’, pp. 5–26 in Towards a Modernisation of the European Social Model, Collegium No.33, Winter 2005, College of Europe Bruges: www.coleurop.be.
Hobsbawm, E. (1996), The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991, London: Abacus.
Hollingsworth, R. and Boyer, R. (eds) (1997), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hoskyns, C. and Newman, M. (eds) (2000), Democratising the European Union — Issues for the Twenty-first Century, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jackson, G. and Deeg, R. (2006), ‘How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analysis of Capitalist Diversity’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 2/2006, Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
Karamessini, M. (2008), ‘Continuity and Change in the Southern European Social Model’, International Labour Review 147 (1): 43–70.
Kaufmann, F-X. (2003), Varianten des Wohlfahrtsstaats. Der deutsche Wohlfahrtsstaat im internationalen Vergleich, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Keune, M. and Jepsen, M. (2007), ‘Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity’, pp. 189–211 in H. Jorgensen and P. K. Madsen (eds), Flexicurity and Beyond, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
Levy, J. D. (2006), ‘The State Also Rises: The Roots of Contemporary State Activism’, pp. 1–28 in J. D. Levy (ed.), The State after Statism. New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
Levy, F. and Temin, P. (2007), ‘Inequality and Institutions in 20th century America’, NBER Working Paper 13106, National Bureau of Economic Research: http://www.nber.org/papers/w13106.
Lewis, J. (1992), ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy 2 (3): 159–73.
Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (eds) (2000), Embedding Organizations, Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-Economic Context, Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Maurice, M., Sellier, F. and Silvestre, J-J. (1986), The Social Foundations of Industrial Power. A Comparison of France and Germany, Cambridge/Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Molina O. and Rhodes M. (2007), ‘The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy’, pp. 223–52 in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (eds), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moravcsik, A. (1994), ‘Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation’, Center for European Studies, Working Paper no. 52, Cambridge: Harvard University.
OECD (2007), ‘The Social Expenditure Database: An Interpretive Guide’, SOCX 1980–2003.
Pontusson, J. (2005), ‘Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism’, pp. 163–88 in D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rubery, J. (1994), ‘The British Production Regime: A Societal-specific System?’, Economy and Society 2 (23): 335–54.
Rubery, J. (2008), ‘The UK as a Third Way: The US Model with a Human Face?’, Industry Studies Conference, SSRN, online: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134962.
Rubery, J. and Grimshaw, D. (2003), The Organization of Employment, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simonazzi, A. (2009), ‘Care Regimes and National Employment Models’, Cambridge Journal of Economics (in press 10.1093/cje/ben043).
Smith, C. and Meiksins, P. (1995), ‘System, Societal and Dominance Effects in Cross-national Organisational analysis’, Work, Employment and Society 9 (2): 241–68.
Sorge, A. (1991), ‘Strategic Fit and the Social Effect: Interpreting Cross-National Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources’, Organization Studies 12 (1991): 161–90.
Streeck, W. (1997), ‘Beneficial Constraints: On the Economic Limits of Rational Voluntarism’, pp. 197–219 in R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer (eds), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness ofInstitutions, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005), ‘Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies’, pp. 1–39 in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, K. (2001), ‘Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies’, pp. 71–103 in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, New York: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’, pp. 208–40 in J. Mahoney and D. Reuschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, L. (ed.) (2003), States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, R. (2007), Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wickham, J. (2005), ‘The End of the European Social Model — Before it Began?’, Dynamo project thematic working paper, online: http://www.dynamoproject.eu/publications.php.
Wilkinson, F. (1983), ‘Productive Systems’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 7 (3/4): 413–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Gerhard Bosch, Steffen Lehndorff and Jill Rubery
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosch, G., Lehndorff, S., Rubery, J. (2009). European Employment Models in Flux:Pressures for Change and Prospects for Survival and Revitalization. In: Bosch, G., Lehndorff, S., Rubery, J. (eds) European Employment Models in Flux. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230237001_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230237001_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30859-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23700-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)