Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Justification Arguments in the Application for the New Nuclear Reactor in Finland

  • Chapter
The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland

Part of the book series: Energy, Climate and the Environment Series ((ECE))

Abstract

In Finland nuclear energy is the only form of energy production that is governed by a specific law and liabilities: the law on atomic energy was enacted in 1957 and the law on atomic liabilities was enacted in 1972. Following the Chernobyl incident in 1986 a new law on nuclear energy, the Nuclear Energy Act (990/1987) accompanied by the Nuclear Energy Decree (161/1988), was deemed necessary and this has been in force since 1988. Under the act, new reactors larger than 50 MWth require a government Decision-in-Principle (DiP) that the new facility will be of benefit to society. The DiP will also require parliamentary approval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • CEPI (2002) Energy Profile 2001. Brussels: Confederation of European Paper Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, M.V. (2007) Dogging the Nuclear Future. Business 2.0, August 2007, 84–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1996) Energy for the Future: Renewable Sources of Energy, Green Paper for a Community Strategy. COM(96)576, 20 November 1996, Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms. Official Journal of the European Union L 338 (13.11.2004), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMV (2006a) Annual Report 2006 to the European Commission. Helsinki: Energy Market Authority, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMV (2006b) Statement of EMV for the Ministiy of Trade and Industry 28/8/06 (in Finnish), Helsinki: Energy Market Authority, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • EREF (2004) Complaint for the European Commission Concerning the Purchase by TVO of the Framatome ANP 1600 MW Nuclear EPR Reactor to a Fixed Price and Under Various Support Schemes from Member States. European Renewable Energies Federation & Kuhbier law firm, Brussels 14 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortum (1999) Loviisa 3 -ydinvoimalaitoshanke — Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiselostus (EIA report of Loviisa-3 nuclear reactor). Vantaa: Fortum Power and Heat Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen, P. (2004) Kansalaiskeskustelu lisäydinvoimasta — mielipidekirjoitukset osallistumiskanavana (Public discussion on additional nuclear power capacity — Written public opinions as a channel of participation). MTI Financed studies 6/2004, Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen, P. and Ruuskanen, T. (2005) Kirjallisten mielipiteiden vaikuttavuus YVA-menettelyssä (Impact of written statements in EIA processes). Alueelliset ympäristöjulkaisut 396, Keski-Suomen ympäristökeskus, Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylkilä, I. (2003) Suomen viidennen ydinvoimalan lobbaus kansanedustajan näkökulmasta (Lobbying process in the Finnish Parliament regarding the 5th Finnish nuclear reactor). MA thesis in Communication, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2006) IEA Energy Statistics Online. OECD International Energy Agency, Paris, www pages: www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/index.asp (15/9).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) Special Report on Emission Scenarios. UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautto, N. (2005) Analysis of Policy Options and Implementation Measures Promoting Electricity from Renewable Biomass in the European Union. DG JRC, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, A. (2000) Phenomena in Finnish Climate Economics — How Will Energy Efficiency and Other Win-Win Opportunities be Taken into Account in the Finnish National Climate Change Strategy? (in Finnish) Futura 19(3), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, A. (2002) Huomioita kansantaloudellisten kustannusten käsittelystä Suomen energiatalouspolitiikassa (Observations on handling national economic costs in Finnish energy economics policy). The Finnish Economic Journal 98, 207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, A. (2004) Teknologian suuri kertomus Suomen ilmastopolitiikassa (Myths of technology in Finnish climate policy). Kanava 32(2), 96–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • MTI (2001) National Climate Strategy — Government Report to Parliament. Publication 5/2001, Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1998) Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update 1998. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and OECD International Energy Agency.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000) Uranium 1999: Resources, Production and Demand. Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and UN International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • MTI (2001) National Climate Strategy — Government Report to Parliament. Publication 5/2001, Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggenkamp, M.M., A. Rønne, C. Redgwell and I. del Guayo (eds) (2001) Energy Law in Europe — National, EU and International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Finland (2005) Energy Statistics 2004. Energy 2005:2, Helsinki: Statistics Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEKES (1999) Bioenergy Research Programme Final Report 1993–1998. Bioenergy Research Programme publications 30, Jyväskylä: TEKES and Jyväskylä Science Park Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirkkonen, J. (2000) Ilmastopolitiikka ja ekologinen modernisaatio (Climate policy and ecological modernisation). Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 781, Tampere: University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • TVO (1999) Olkiluodon ydinvoimalaitoksen laajentaminen kolmannella laitosyksiköllä — Ympäristövaikutusten arviointiselostus (EIA report of Olkiluoto-3 nuclear reactor). Olkiluoto: Teollisuuden Voima Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • TVO (2000) Ydinvoimalaitosyksikön rakentamista koskeva periaatepäätöshakemus — Loviisa 3/Olkiluoto 3 (Application for DiP for 5th Finnish nuclear reactor). Olkiluoto: Teollisuuden Voima Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2000) World Energy Assessment — Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability. United Nations Development Programme, New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and World Energy Council, UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, W. (2006) A Change in Climate — Political Worries are Driving Nuclear Rethink in the West. Newsweek 6 February, 37–8 (and related articles on pages 30–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2005) Key GHG Data — Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data for 1990–2003 Submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn: UNFCCC Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väisänen, T.S., P. Martikainen, S.K. Hellsten, A. Niskanen, J. Huttunen, M. Heiskanen and O. Nenonen (1996) Importance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Finnish Hydropower Production Compared to Other Sources o f Electricity, with the Kemijoki Water Body as an Example. Montreal: IAEA Advisory Group Meeting on Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Full Energy Chain for Hydropower, Nuclear Power and Other Energy Sources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehmas, J. (2002) ‘Rahat Ruotsiin ja päästöt Tanskaan’ — Suomen ympäristöperusteisen energiaverotuksen rekonstituutio 1993–96 (‘Money for Sweden and CO2 emissions to Denmark’ — Reconstitution of the Finnish environment-based energy taxation in 1993–96). Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 861, Tampere: University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • VN (2002) Valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös 17 päivänä tammikuuta 2002 Teollisuuden Voima Oy:n hakemukseen ydinvoimalaitosyksikön rakentamisesta (Government decision on the TVO application for DiP). M4/2001vp, Helsnki: Valtioneuvosto (Government).

    Google Scholar 

Finnish nuclear power legislature Laws (www.finlex.fi/en/)

Finnish nuclear power legislature Other regulations

  • (www.stuk.fi/ydinturvallisuus/ydinvoimalaitokset/saannosto/en_GB/saannosto/)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Ari Lampinen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lampinen, A. (2009). An Analysis of the Justification Arguments in the Application for the New Nuclear Reactor in Finland. In: Kojo, M., Litmanen, T. (eds) The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230237032_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics