Skip to main content

The Development of the Reconciliation Principle in EU Discourse

  • Chapter
Reconciling Work and Family Life in EU Law and Policy

Abstract

Neither the concept of reconciliation of work and family life nor family policies102 were contemplated by the original Treaty of the European Community. This is unsurprising in an economically oriented Treaty, the primary aim of which was to create a single market. The Treaty of Rome was market-making rather than market-correcting and it aimed to create an integrated labour market that functioned efficiently, rather than to correct its outcomes in line with political standards of social justice.103 Such an approach was reinforced by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which was initially reluctant to deal with questions concerning the family, its organisation and the division of responsibility between parents.104 Accordingly, in this context, social goals were seen as merely side issues to achieving greater economic integration.105 Over the last two decades, however, the political and legal context has changed dramatically and in recent years there has been a substantive shift towards more social-based legislation. In particular, the Treaty of Amsterdam made it clear that equality is to be viewed as a proactive obligation within the EU.106 As a result of this process, reconciliation has gradually been included in the agenda. Its development, at least at an early stage, has been ancillary to the development of other issues rather than as a stand-alone concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. Streeck, ‘Neo-Voluntarism: A New Social Policy Regime’, European Law Journal, 1 (1995), p. 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Ohlin, ‘Social Aspects of European Economic Co-operation: Report by a Group of Expert’, International Labour Review, 102 (1956), 99

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Barnard, The Economic Objectives of Article 119’, in T. Hervey and D. O’Keeffe (eds), Sex Equality Law in the European Union (Chichester: Wiley, 1996), 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Numhauser-Henning, ‘EU Sex Equality post-Amsterdam’, in H. Meenan (ed.). Equality Law in an Enlarged European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Leira, Working Parents and the Welfare State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See T. Hervey, European Social Law and Policy (Harlow: Longman, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See for instance: F. Beveridge and S. Velluti, Gender and the Open Method of Coordination Perspectives on Law, Governance and Equality in the EU (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Caracciolo di Torella and A. Masselot, ‘Pregnancy, Maternity and the Organisation of Family Life: An Attempt to Classify the Case Law of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26 (2001), 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. O’Leari, Employment Law at the European Court of Justice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. On this point see further G. James, The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Parenthood (London: Cavendish-Routledge, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Caracciolo di Torella and A. Masselot, ‘Pregnancy, Maternity and the Organisation of Family Life: An Attempt to Classify the Case Law of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review 26 (2001), 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. McGlynn, ‘Reclaiming a Feminist Vision: The Reconciliation of Paid Work and Family Life in European Union Law and Policy’, The Columbia Journal of European Law, 7(2) (2001), 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Ackers, Shifting Spaces — Women, Citizenship and Migration in the European Union (Bristol: Policy Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hadj-Ayed and A. Masselot, ‘Reconciliation between Work and Family Life in the EU: Reshaping Gendered Structures?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26(3) (2004), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Fredman, ‘European Discrimination Law: A Critique’, Industrial Law Journal 21 (1992), 119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Finley, ‘Transcending Equality Theory: A Way Out of the Maternity and the Workplace Debate’, Columbia Law Review, 86 (1986), 1118–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. See further M. Stratigaki, ‘The European Union and the Equal Opportunities Process’, in L. Hantrais (ed.), Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life (London: Macmillan, 2000), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Benn, Madonna and Child: Towards a new Politics of Motherhood (London: Jonathan Cape, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hokyns, Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union (London: Verso, 1996), p. 52

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Koukoulis-Spiliotopoulos, The Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Maintaining and Developing the acquis in Gender Equality’, European Gender Equality Law Review, 1 (2008), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a different interpretation see G. James, The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Maternity in the Labour Market (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Eugenia Caracciolo di Torella and Annick Masselot

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torella, E.C.d., Masselot, A. (2010). The Development of the Reconciliation Principle in EU Discourse. In: Reconciling Work and Family Life in EU Law and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246683_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics