Skip to main content

Democratic Conclusions

  • Chapter
How Power Corrupts
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

If politics concerns the question of ‘what should we do?’ then democracy holds that we should consult the citizenry, empower selected agents to govern effectively and guard against the concentration of power. Since liberalism’s attack on religious dogma and the absolutist state, we have learned to refrain from dictating the good for others and resolved to ask individuals for their own conception of the good. As Jürgen Habermas so cogently asserts, ‘all things considered, the best judge of individual interests is the individual themselves’.1 Democracy is not, therefore, a universal truth to be imposed on others, but is, instead, a practice evolved to prevent the imposition of a universal truth.- We thus do democracy nol because we know, but because we do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bakunin, M., ‘The Illusion of Universal Suffrage’, in Woodcock, G. (ed.), The Anarchist Reader, London: Foiitana/CoUins, 1977, pp. 108–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Popper, K., The Open Society and its Enemies, London: Routledge, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apel, K.O., Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, London: Routledge, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  4. Putnam, H., ‘A Reconsideration of Deweyan Democracy’, in Renewing Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Power, M., The Audit Soäety, Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLuca, T. The Two Faces of Political Apathy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mill, J.S., Considerations on Represe.nta.tive Government, London: Everyman, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gasiil, J., Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision-making and Communication, Gabriola Island: New Society, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bath, C, Learning to Belong: Exploring Young Children’s Participation at the Start of School, London: Rouiiedge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fishkin, J.S., The Dialogue of Justice: Toward a Self-Reflective Society, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mead, G.H., Mind, Self, and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, M., Power/Knowledge, New York: Random House, 1980, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Ricardo Blaug

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blaug, R. (2010). Democratic Conclusions. In: How Power Corrupts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274853_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics