Abstract
The EU security policy was a leap in the dark. It was constructed under an agreement that the EU should have such a policy, but not what it should be about. On 12 December 2003, the leaders of the European Union approved the first-ever European Security Strategy, the ESS, proclaiming an intention to ‘share in the responsibility for global security and in building a better world’.1 The ESS summons up the EU’s external dimension, in a manner that transcends the metaphorical ‘pillars’ intended to visualize the workings of the Union. It encapsulates foreign and security policy—from the development and neighbourhood policies of the European Commission, via the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), under the auspices of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to police and judicial cooperation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Note
Biscop, S. & Andersson, J. J. (2008). The EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a Global Europe. Routledge Advances in European Politics, 49. London: Routledge, p. 2.
See Berenskoetter, F. S. (2005). Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Security Strategies. Security Dialogue, 36 (1), 71–92
Duke, S. (2008). The Future of EU-NATO Relations: A case of Mutual Irrelevance through Competition? Journal of European Integration, 30 (1), 27–43; Bailes, A. J. K. (2005). The European Security Strategy An Evolutionary History. SIPRI policy paper, no. 10.
Toje, A. (2008c). The 2003 European Union Security Strategy—a Critical Appraisal, European Foreign Affairs Review, 9, (1), 2005, s. 117–134.
Rieker, P. & Ulriksen, S. (2003). En Annerledes supermakt?: Sikkerhets-og fors-varspolitikken i EU. Oslo: NUPI.
See Holden, P. (2009). In Search of Structural Power: EU Aid Policy as a Global Political Instrument. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
Clausewitz, C. v (1976). On War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 283.
Gideon Rose (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World Politics, 51 (1), pp. 144.
Weigley, R. F. (1973). The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. New York: Macmillan.
Barkawi, T. (1998). Strategy as a Vocation: Weber, Morgenthau and Modern Strategic Studies. Review of International Studies, 24 (2), 159–184.
Laïdi, Z. (2008). Norms over Force: The Enigma of European Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Menon, A. (2009). Empowering Paradise? The ESDP at Ten. International Affairs, 85 (2), pp. 227–246.
Vasconcelos, A., Grevi, G., Helly, D., Keohane, D., Schmid, H. & Zaborowski, M. (2009). The European Security Strategy, 2003–2008: Building on Common Interests. Paris: Institute for Security Studies, European Union.
Kaldor, M. (2007). Human Security: Reflections on Globalization and Intervention. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
For a critical appraisal of the efforts of applying Human Security see Paris, R. (2001). Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security, 26, p. 87.
Rees, W. (2008). Inside Out: the External Face of EU Internal Security Policy. Journal of European Integration, 30 (1), 102.
Art, Robert J. (2006). Striking the Balance. International Security, 30 (3), pp. 177–185
Posen, Barry (2006). European Union Security and Defense Policy: Response to Unipolarity? Security Studies, 15 (2): 149–186
Brooks, S. G. & Wohlforth, W. C. (2005). Hard Times for Soft Balancing. International Security, 30 (1), pp. 72–108.
Howorth, J. & Menon, A. (2009). Still not Pushing Back: Why the European Union is not Balancing against the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (5), pp. 727–744.
See, for example, the case studies in Keohane, R. O. & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
Snyder, G. H. (1984). The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics. World Politics, 36 (4), 461–495.
Hoffmann, S. (1976). No Trumps, No Luck, No Will. In Chace, J. & Ravenal, E. C. (eds). Atlantis Lost: US-European Relations after the Cold War. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, pp. 1–22.
See Dow, J. (1998). Arbitrage, Hedging, and Financial Innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 11 (4), pp. 739–755
Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability. Washington Quarterly, 29 (1), p. 145.
See Art, R. J. (2004). Europe Hedges Its Security Bets,. In Paul, T. V., Wirtz, J. J. & Fortmann, M. (eds), Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Grevi, G. (2009). The interpolar world: A new scenario. Paris: Institute for Security Studies
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International Institutionalization. The New International Relations. London: Routledge, p. 106.
Tunsjø, Ø. (2009). Hvordan ‘hedge’ i internasjonal politikk? Internasjonal politikk, 67 (2), pp. 259–271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Asle Toje
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toje, A. (2010). The European Security Strategy Revisited. In: The European Union as a Small Power. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281813_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281813_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31869-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28181-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)