Skip to main content

Internet Versus Conventional Polls in the General Election

  • Chapter
Political Communications
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Britain’s pollsters went some way to rehabilitating themselves in the 2005 General Election. Every poll published on the morning of 5 May was correct to within 2 percentage points for Labour, Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats. After the horrors of 1992 (when not a single poll in election week came anywhere near the final result), and the less-than-perfect polling performances in 1997 and 2001 (when most surveys still overstated Labour support and understated the Conservatives), the outcome of the 2005 election was met by Britain’s pollsters with understandable relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Moon, N. (1999) Opinion Polls: History, Theory and Practice. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, N. (2001) ‘More anger than apathy’, Guardian, 6 November.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Peter Kellner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kellner, P. (2007). Internet Versus Conventional Polls in the General Election. In: Wring, D., Green, J., Mortimore, R., Atkinson, S. (eds) Political Communications. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286306_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics