Abstract
The relationship between beauty practices, femininity and feminism is well documented in the scholarly literature. In many societies, ‘doing’ beauty is a vital component of ‘doing’ femininity: being beautiful, as defined by the norms of a society — for example, in terms of skin type and complexion, and body shape, size and appearance — and working towards achieving those conventional standards are an accepted (and expected) part of what women do by virtue of being ‘women’. Some feminists (associated, especially, with the ‘second wave’) have criticized normative beauty practices, and the highly profitable commercialized beauty industry that drives those practices, as oppressive upon women generally. The beauty industry has been targeted for upholding narrow and restrictive definitions of beauty, for reinforcing the burden of ‘lookism’ upon women (namely, women are constantly judged by how they look), and for promoting unhealthy body image obsessions and potentially harmful beauty procedures (Bordo, 1995; Coward, 1984; Kilbourne, 1999). However, other feminists (identified with the ‘third wave’ and whose views quite easily fit within that of postfeminism), have reclaimed beauty practices as enjoyable, self-chosen and skilled feminine pursuits (e.g. Jervis and Zeisler, 2006).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Akass, K. and J. Mccabe (eds) (2004) Reading Sex and the City (London: I. B. Tauris).
Archer, A. and S. Stent (forthcoming) ‘Red Socks and Purple Rain: The Political Uses of Colour in Late Apartheid South Africa’, submitted to Visual Communication.
Bordo, S. (1995) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Cohen, P. (2006) ‘Today, Some Feminists Hate the Word “Choice”’, The Nation, 15 January.
Coward, R. (1984) The Female Desire (London: Paladin).
Dyer, G. (1988) Advertising as Communication (London: Routledge).
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis (London: Routledge).
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock).
Gauntlett, D. (2008) Media, Gender and Identity (London: Routledge).
Gill, R. (2003) ‘From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Re-sexualisation of Women’s Bodies in the Media’, Feminist Media Studies 3(1): 100–6.
Gill, R. (2009) ‘Mediated Intimacy and Postfeminism: A Discourse Analytic Examination of Sex and Relationships Advice in a Women’s Magazine’, Discourse and Communication 3(4): 345–69.
Goldman, R. (1992) Reading Ads Socially (London: Routledge).
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as a Social Semiotic (London: Edward Arnold).
Hollows, J. (2000) Feminism, Femininity and Popular Culture (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Jackson, S. (2006) ‘Street Girl: “New” Sexual Subjectivity in a NZ Soap Drama?’, Feminist Media Studies 6(4): 469–86.
Jervis, L. and A. Zeisler (eds) (2006) Bitchfest (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).
Kilbourne, J. (1999) Can’t Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel (New York: Simon & Schuster).
Lazar, M. M. (2001) ‘For the Good of the Nation: “Strategic Egalitarianism” in the Singapore Context’, Nations and Nationalism 7(1): 59–74.
Lazar, M. M. (2005) Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Lazar, M. M. (2009) ‘Entitled to Consume: Postfeminist Femininity and a Culture of Post-critique’, Discourse and Communication 3(4): 371–400.
Macdonald, M. (1995) Representing Women (London: Edward Arnold).
Martin, J. R. and P. R. R. White (2005) The Language of Evaluation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Mascia-Lees, F. and P. Sharpe (2000) Taking a Stand in a Postfeminist World (Albany: State University of New York Press).
McRobbie, A. (2007) ‘Postfeminism and Popular Culture: Bridget Jones and the New Girl Regime’ in Y. Tasker and D. Negra (eds), Interrogating Postfeminism (Durham: Duke University Press).
Purushotam, N. (1992) ‘Women and Knowledge/Power: Notes on the Singapore Dilemma’ in K. C. Ban et al. (eds), Imagining Singapore (Singapore: Times Academic Press).
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993) ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse and Society 4(2): 249–83.
Weingarten, R. C. (2006) Hello Gorgeous! Beauty Products in America ‘40s-’60s (Portland, Oregon: Collectors Press).
Wetherell, W. (1995) ‘Romantic Discourse and Feminist Analysis: Interrogating Investment, Power and Desire’ in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds), Feminism and Discourse (London: Sage).
Williamson, J. (1978) Decoding Advertisements (London: Marion Boyars).
Wodak, R. and M. Meyer (eds) (2009) Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis. Second Edition (London: Sage).
Wolf, N. (1991) The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used against Women (New York: Anchor Books).
Zeisler, A. (2008) Feminism and Pop Culture (Berkeley, CA: Seal Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Michelle M. Lazar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lazar, M.M. (2011). The Right to Be Beautiful: Postfeminist Identity and Consumer Beauty Advertising. In: Gill, R., Scharff, C. (eds) New Femininities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294523_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294523_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30851-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29452-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)