Skip to main content
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

This essay is eco-friendly but trades in echoes. It reprises Paul Alpers’ iconic What is Pastoral? (1996) via the figure of a parenthetical repetition that demands to be reminded, one more time, ‘What was Pastoral (Again)?’ My answer or simply what follows will be ‘More Versions’, an addendum, if you like, to William Empson’s Some Versions of Pastoral (1935).

My favorite trope for dog tales is ‘metaplasm.’ Metaplasm means a change in a word, for example adding, omitting, inverting, or transposing its letters, syllables, or sounds. The term is from the Greek metaplasmos, meaning remodeling or remolding. I use metaplasm to mean the remodeling of dog and human flesh, remolding the codes of life, in the history of companion species relating … Metaplasm can signify a mistake, a stumbling, a troping that makes a fleshly difference … Woof!

Donna Haraway, The Companion Species Manifesto1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Donna Haraway, The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), 84–85. Jonathan Goldberg’s reading of this section of Of Grammatology remains singularly important; see Jonathan Goldberg, Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giorgio Agamben, The Open: Man and Animal, trans. Kevin Attell (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 67–68. Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent references will appear parenthetically in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donna Haraway, When Species Meet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raymond Williams, Television: Technology and Cultural Form [1974/5] (Routledge: London and New York, 1990), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quentin Skinner, ‘Sir Thomas More’s Utopia and the Language of Renaissance Humanism’, in Anthony Pagden, ed., The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 123–158. This essay is revised and reprinted as ‘Thomas More’s Utopia and the Virtue of True Nobility’, in Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, 3 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), II, 213–244.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony Grafton and Lisa Jardine, From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth and Sixteenth-Century Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keith Thomas, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England, 1500–1800 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1984), 250–251.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Terry Gifford, Pastoral (New York and London: Routledge, 1999), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert N. Watson, Back to Nature: The Green and the Real in the Late Renaissance (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006), 66. For a similar reading of pastoral keyed this time to the rise of the machine, see Jonathan Sawday, Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine (New York: Routledge, 2007), 294–309.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leo Marx, ‘Pastoralism in America’, in Sacvan Bercovitch and Myra Jehlen, eds, Ideology and Classic American Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Alpers, What is Pastoral? (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1996), x.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin Heidegger, ‘Letter on Humanism’, in Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), 234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1975), 9–12, 13–45. Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent references appear parenthetically in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For an allied modeling on genre as rhizome, see Wai Chee Dimock, ‘Genre as World System: Epic and Novel on Four Continents’, Narrative 14: 1 (January 2006), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paul de Man, The Resistance to Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. William Empson, Some Versions of Pastoral (New York: New Directions, 1974), 11. Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent references appear parenthetically in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  18. David M. Halperin, Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983), 211. Thanks to Carolyn Dinshaw for sending me to Halperin.

    Google Scholar 

  19. William Berg, Early Virgil (London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1974), 13–14 quoted in Halperin, Before Pastoral, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  20. John Fletcher, The Faithful Shepherdess, ed. Florence Ada Kirk (New York and London: Garland, 1980), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fernand Braudel, Capitalism and Material Life, 1400–1800 (New York, San Francisco and London: Harper & Row, 1967), 68. Pastoral exists in non-Western societies–but it is not indexed necessarily to shepherds or to sheep. Haruki Murakami’s Wild Sheep Chase, trans. Alfred Birnbaum (New York: Vintage Books, 1989) is a case in point. Sheep in Japan are a nineteenth-century Western import allied to nationalism, militarism, self-sufficiency and empire-building.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. L. Ryder, Sheep and Man (London: Duckworth, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 177–178 and 181.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thelma Rowell, ‘A Few Peculiar Primates’, in Shirley C. Strum and Linda Fedigan, eds, Primate Encounters: Models of Science, Gender, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  25. William Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part Two, ed. Roger Warren (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas Shadwell, The Virtuoso (1676), ed. David Stuart Rhodes and Marjorie Hope Nicolson (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1966), 2.2.190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vinciane Despret, ‘Sheep Do Have Opinions’, in Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, eds, Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), 360. See also, Vinciane Despret, Quand le loup habitera avec l’agneau (Paris: Seuill, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Julian Yates

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yates, J. (2011). What was Pastoral (Again)? More Versions. In: Cefalu, P., Reynolds, B. (eds) The Return of Theory in Early Modern English Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299986_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics