Skip to main content

EU Policy on Economic Partnership Agreements: Trade… and Aid?

  • Chapter
Making EU Foreign Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

  • 597 Accesses

Abstract

The empirical focus of this chapter is the internal negotiation processes within the European Union (EU) in its efforts to conclude Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with 79 developing countries. I seek to explain two different policy outcomes: the agreements on an EU negotiation mandate in 2002 and on the Union’s final negotiation offer in 2007. EPAs are negotiated with six regional groupings of Third World countries (Central Africa, West Africa, Southern Africa Development Community, East and Southern Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific) and are considered a novel form of cooperation with developing countries (Holland, 2002). The EPA talks are formally defined as trade negotiations and actual negotiations are handled by Directorate General (DG) Trade, guided by a Council negotiation directive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

Books and articles

  • Babarinde, O. (1994) The Lomé Conventions and Development. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babarinde, O. and Faber, G. (2004) ‘From Lomé to Cotonou: Business as Usual?’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 9: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, G. (1998) ‘Human Right and Democracy in European Development Policy’, in M. Lister (ed.) European Union Development Policy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A. (2006) ‘Assessing the EU’s Role in International Trade Negotiations’, European Political Science, 5: 362–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O. (2005a) ‘Consolidating “Unobjectionable” Norms: Negotiating Norm Spread in the European Union’, in O. Elgström and C. Jönsson (eds) European Union Negotiations. London and New York: Routledge, pp.29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O. (2005b) ‘The Cotonou Agreement. Asymmetric Negotiations and the Impact of Norms’, in O. Elgström and C. Jönsson (eds) European Union Negotiations. London & New York: Routledge, pp.183–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.B., Jacobson, H.K. and Putnam, R.D. (eds) (1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy — International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, E.Z. (1993) The European Community and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. (2002) The European Union and the Third World. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M. (1997) The European Union and the South. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M. (1998) ‘Europe’s New Development Policy’, in M. Lister (ed.) European Union Development Policy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices. The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42: 427–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, J. (1992) ‘When Weakness is Strength’, in I.W. Zartman (ed.) Europe and Africa. The New Phase. Boulder, Co.: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2004) ‘The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(5): 999–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A.R. (2007) ‘Trade Politics Ain’t What It Used to Be: The European Union in the Doha Round’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4): 789–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Official documents and other sources

  • ACP (2005) ACP Council of Ministers Declaration of the 81st Session, held in Brussels 21–22 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission (2002a) Draft Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorizing the Commission to negotiate Economic Partnership Agreements with the ACP countries and regions, Brussels, 9 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission (2002b) EU Mandate for Trade Negotiations with African, Caribbean and Pacific Countries, Brussels, 17 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission (2005) Note for the Attention of Delegations in ACP Countries. Subject: Recent UK Statements on EPAs, Brussels, 11 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council (2002) EU Council of Ministers Directives for the Negotiation of Economic Partnership Agreements with ACP Countries and Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI and DFID (2005) Economic Partnership Agreements: Making EPAs Deliver for Development, Department of Trade and Department for International Development, 22 March; www.dti.gov.uk.

  • European Research Office (2002) The ACP Guidelines and the EU Negotiating Mandate: A Comparison, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times (2006) ‘UK Urges EU to Ease Trade Laws for Poor Nations’, by Alan Beattie, 15 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P. (2005) Statement to the Development Committee of the European Parliament by Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson, Brussels, 17 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P. (2007a) ‘Economic Partnership Agreements: Tackling the Myths’, in l’Express Dimanche, 10 June, http://www.lexpress.mu.

  • Mandelson, P. (2007b) Comments at the INTA Committee, European Parliament, 22 October, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2007/october/tradoc_136542.pdf.

  • The Guardian (1995) ‘Blaming Brussels’, by Jeffery, S., 19 May.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Ole Elgström

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elgström, O. (2011). EU Policy on Economic Partnership Agreements: Trade… and Aid?. In: Thomas, D.C. (eds) Making EU Foreign Policy. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307360_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics