Skip to main content

IT Service Quality in Outsourcing Relationships

  • Chapter
Collaboration in Outsourcing

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

For many outsourcing service providers, the Deming circle often comes down to Plan, Do, Hope, and Forget. The service providers start planning, and delivering the service accordingly, but forget to check whether the delivered service actually meets the quality expectations. The reason that so many service providers stop after the first two phases can be attributed to the fact that it is difficult to measure the actual service quality that is delivered to the customer and to identify areas for improvement. This chapter aims to develop a model that addresses the estimation of IT service quality in an outsourcing relationship. Based on the SERVQUAL model and inspired by the intense debates on the correctness of the model, this chapter tries to combine the favorable characteristics of the SERVQUAL and derived models. By uniting the best aspects of every model, managers are given an instrument that delivers valuable information on the level of service quality that customers expect and how they perceive the delivered quality. If service providers use the tool that is presented in this chapter, they finally will be able change their Deming cycle into Plan, Do, Check, and Act.

“In God we trust; all others must bring data.”

W. Edwards Deming

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 65.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 70.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J., and Swan, J. E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing 10(6): 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babakus, E., and Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research 24(3): 253–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bon, J. V., Jong, A. D., Kolthof, A. et al. (2007). IT service management: an introduction. Norwich, NL: Van Haren Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.R. (1986). Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In W.D. Berry & M.S. Lewis-Beck (Eds), New tools for social scientists: Advances and applications in research methods (pp. 57–76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing 30(1): 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, S., Whitten, D., and Green, K. (2007). Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: Client orientation and promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. Journal of Computer Information Systems 48(2): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. The Journal of Marketing 56(3): 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croteau, A. and Bergeron, F. (2001). An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 10(2): 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, T. P. V., Leon A. Kappelman, and Prybutok, V. R. (1997). Measuring information systems service quality: Concerns on the use of the SERVQUAL questionnaire. MIS Quarterly 21(2):, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewald, H. and Helbig, K. (2006). A governance model for managing outsourcing partnerships: A view from practice. In HICSS(2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing 18(4): 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2001). The perceived service quality concept – a mistake? Managing Service Quality 11(3): 150–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C. and Venkatraman, H. (1999). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Journal of Research and Development 38(2/3): 472.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITIL Definition: IT Service (v1, v2, v3). (2010). Retrieved June 4, 2010, from http://www.knowledgetransfer.net/dictionary/ITIL/en/IT_Service.htm.

  • ITU: Committed to connecting the world. (2010). International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.itu.int/en/pages/default.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., and Carr, C. L. (2002). Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quarterly 26(2): 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., and Crampton, S. M. (2000). A note on SERVQUAL reliability and validity in information system service quality measurement. Decision Sciences 31(3): 725–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. (1995). The determinants of service quality: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. International Journal of Service Industry Management 6(5): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., and Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(2), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, T. (1997). The gestalt of an information technology outsourcing relationship: an exploratory analysis. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on information systems. (pp. 37–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger, W. J. and Lee, C. C. (1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences 25(5–6), 737–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger, W. J., Park, S., and Smith, J. (2009). Understanding the consequences of information systems service quality on IS service reuse. Inf. Manage. 46(6): 335–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. R., BeugrÉ, C. D., and Coverdale, T. K. (2003). Information systems outsourcing: exploration on the impact of outsourcing service providers’ service quality. Issues in Information Systems (IIS) 4(2): 528–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 1(2): 172–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, H., Prybutok, V., Zhang, X., & Peak, D. (2009). Measuring IS system service quality with SERVQUAL: Users’ perceptions of relative importance of the five SERVPERF dimensions. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 12, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. C. and Booms, B. H. (1983). The marketing aspects of service quality. Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luk, S. T. K., and Layton, R. (2002). Perception gaps in customer expectations: Managers versus service providers and customers. The Service Industries Journal 22(2): 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerscough, M. (2002). Information systems quality assessment: REPLICATING Kettinger and Lees USISF/SERVQUAL combination. AMCIS 2002 Proceedings, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB Circular A-11. (2010). Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a11_current_year_a11_toc/.

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1): 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing 49(4): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing 70(3): 201–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., and Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly 19(2): 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roses, L. K., Hoppen, N., Ballaz, B., & Mello Freire, K. D. (n.d.). Quality evaluation in information systems outsourcing. In: AIM – Association Information and Management, 2006, Luxemburgo. 11th Conference of the Association Information and Management, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostack, G. L. (1977). Breaking free from product marketing. The Journal of Marketing 41(2): 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. M. and Wong, S. F. (2009). Understanding customer satisfaction in the IT outsourcing environment: A classification of quality attributes. Journal of Outsourcing and Organizational Information Management: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Internet Usage Statistics News and World Population Stats. (2010). Internet world stats. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Jonathan Aarnouts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aarnouts, J. (2012). IT Service Quality in Outsourcing Relationships. In: Brinkkemper, S., Jansen, S. (eds) Collaboration in Outsourcing. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362994_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics