Skip to main content

The Olympic Movement’s New Media Revolution: Monetisation, Open Media and Intellectual Property

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Olympic Studies

Abstract

In October 2009, the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) 13th Olympic Congress devoted one of its core discussion themes to the ‘digital revolution’ - asking how digital technologies could be harnessed more effectively to promote the values of Olympism. Until then, it had not been a major innovator in the area of digital technology or, at least, it had not taken full advantage of the web’s possibilities. In contrast, from one Games to the next, the IOC’s core media partners have steadily developed media technology and delivery from high definition broadcasting, television on demand to the online streaming of Olympic sports.1 The explanation for this difference is that the Olympic movement has rarely taken ownership of such innovation, benefiting by association with world-leading media partners rather than developing its own intellectual property around being a media technology innovator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, C. (2009) ‘Free! Why $0.00 is the Future of Business’, Wired [Internet]. 16 March, at: www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belén, A., M. de Moragas and R. Paniagua (1999) ‘The Evolution of Volunteers at the Olympic Games’, paper presented at the Conference on Volunteers, Global Society and the Olympic Movement, Lausanne, Switzerland, at: http://olympicstudies.uab.es/ volunteers/moreno.html (accessed: 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, S. and C. Willis (2003) We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information, The Media Center: The American Press Institute, at: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/download/we_media.pdf (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., G. Scott and L. Gilad (2010) ‘Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter’, Proceedings of the HICSS-43 Conference, January 2010, at; www. danah.org/papers/TweetTweetRetweet.pdf (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • British Olympic Foundation (2006) The Modern Olympics Fact Sheet, at: www.olympics.org.uk/documents/Fact%20Files/Modern_Games.pdf (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2003) ‘The Web and Its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online’ New Media and Society, 5.2, 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D. (ed.) (2004) Web Studies, 2nd edition (London: Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmour, D. (2006) We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People (Sebastopol CA: OReilly & Associates).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, L. (2009) ‘Social News, Citizen Journalism and Democracy’, New Media and Society, 11.8, 1287–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOC (2009) XIII Olympic Congress Theme 5: The Digital Revolution (September 2009), at: http://bit.ly/IOCdigitalrevolution (accessed 19 March 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • IOC (2010) ‘Olympic Marketing Fact File’, at: www.olympic.org/Documents/IOC_Marketing/IOC_Marketing_Fact_File_2010%20r.pdf (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • IOC (2010) Olympic Review, No. 74, at: http://view.digipage.net/?id=olympicreview74 (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where New Media and Old Media Collide (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, L. (2009) ‘User-generated Content on the Internet: An Examination of Gratifications, Civic Engagement and Psychological Empowerment’, New Media and Society, 11.8, 1327–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2004) ‘The Challenges of Changing Audiences’ Or, What is the Audience Researcher To Do in the Age of the Internet?’, European Journal of Communications, 19.1, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, D. (2004) ‘Weblogs and the Epistemology of the News: Some Trends in Online Journalism’, New Media and Society, 6.4, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miah, A., B. Gracia and T. Zhihui (2008) ‘We Are the Media: Non-Acredited Media Centres’, in E. M. Price and P. Dayan (eds), Owning the Olympics: Narratives of the New China (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 452–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (2010) ‘The BBC’s Management of Its Coverage of Major Sporting and Music Events: Review by the Comptroller and Auditor General Presented to the BBC Trust’s Finance and Compliance Committee’, at: www.nao.org.uk/publications/0910/bbc_coverage_of_major_events.aspx (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. (1999) A Brief History of the Future: The Origins of the Internet (London: Phoenix)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005) What Is Web 2.0?: Designs, Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, at www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/t/news/2005/09/30/whatis-web-20.html (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, S. and B. Young (2001) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (Sebastopol CA: O’Reilly & Associates).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010) ‘Aliases, Creeping, and Wall Cleaning: Understanding Privacy in the Age of Facebook’, First Monday, 15.1, at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2775/2432 (accessed 27 July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (2008) ‘A Most Useful Definition of Citizen Journalism’, at: http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/14/a_most_useful_d.html (accessed 27 July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. and A. Williams (2008) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (London: Atlantic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitter API Wiki (2010) ‘Things Every Developer Should Know.’ Available at: http:// apiwiki.twitter.com/Things-Every-Developer-Should Know#3The APIisentirely HTTP based (accessed 27 July 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, G. and S. Wunsch-Vincent (2006) Participative Web: User-Created Content (report): Committee for Information, Computer and Communication Policy, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/ 57/14/38393115.pdf?contentid=38393116 (accessed 16 August 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. (1998) Media, Technology and Society, A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Andy Miah and Jennifer Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miah, A., Jones, J. (2012). The Olympic Movement’s New Media Revolution: Monetisation, Open Media and Intellectual Property. In: Lenskyj, H.J., Wagg, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Olympic Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367463_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics