Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Economy ((IPES))

Abstract

Something fundamental has been changing in parts of the developing world. Many senior politicians have begun to de-emphasize the distribution of patronage (goods, services, funds and favours) through networks of clients. Political scientists call patronage distribution ‘clientelism’, and it has long been a crucial – often the crucial – element in politicians’ efforts to cultivate support. But in recent times, a significant number have increasingly turned to ‘post-clientelist’ initiatives – to programmes and policies that are substantially or entirely protected from people who seek to siphon off resources for use as patronage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Brass, J. N., et al. (2010) ‘Does Patronage Still Drive Politics for the Rural Poor in the Developing World? A Comparative Perspective from the Livestock Sector’ in Development and Change 41(3): 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2002) ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’ in Journal of Democracy January: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. (2009) ‘The Unnoticed Opening: Citizens Organisations and Democracy in Africa’, paper for an International Conference at the University of Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (2000) ‘Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics’ in September: 845–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M., Ng’ethe, N. and Manor, J. (2012) Against the Odds: Politicians, Institutions and the Struggle against Poverty (London and New York: Hurst/Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Kimchoen, et al. (2007) ‘Accountability and Neo-Patrimonialism in Cambodia: A Critical Literature Review’, Working Paper 34 (Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Therkildsen, O. (2009) ‘Competitive Elections, Ethnicity and Elite Policy Responses’, paper for an International Conference at the University of Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 James Manor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manor, J. (2013). Post-clientelist Initiatives. In: Stokke, K., Törnquist, O. (eds) Democratization in the Global South. International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370043_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics