Abstract
Up to this point I have offered interpretations of Ralegh’s works in terms of their original occasions and audiences, elucidating their significance within the political and literary culture of the 1610s, their time of writing and first reception. Now I turn to the ways in which Ralegh’s texts, and indeed the character ‘Ralegh’, were reformed and re-interpreted in the decades after his death. This process was a complex one, and the material I have suggests that any crude binary division between consensus and conflict are inappropriate, a point made in general terms by Peter Lake (1994, p. 173) when he warns his fellow historians about reducing the historiography of the period to
the view of a calmly unifying ‘political culture’, a series of divergent but compatible rhetorics of law and divine right, running through this period, on the one hand; and a rather crude rendition of ideological commitment in which the actions of contemporaries were simply determined by their adherence to coherent and mutually exclusive bodies of ideas, on the other.
‘Stab at thee he that will, no stab thy Soule can kill.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1997 Anna R. Beer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beer, A.R. (1997). Resurrecting Ralegh: the 1620s and 1630s. In: Sir Walter Ralegh and his Readers in the Seventeenth Century. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371606_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371606_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39800-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37160-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)