Skip to main content

Modern Liberalism

  • Chapter
Classical Liberalism
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

No society has ever fully exemplified that form which classical liberals maintain is best. Classical liberal ideas greatly influenced the founding fathers of the USA in their design of its constitution. They also inspired much reform in Britain in the nineteenth century. However, today, neither society comes close to being a liberal polity as classical liberals conceive of one. Both contain far too much legislation and regulation restrictive of the liberty of members. Among such is all that which authorizes the government to impose taxes so as to create a far higher degree of material equality than would otherwise exist. All taxation for such redistributive purposes amounts to interference with what would otherwise be the spontaneous distributive outcome of the voluntary transactions between individuals. In the eyes of classical liberals, government acts other than innocuously when it compels one person to part with portions of what would otherwise be their own property for the sake of supplying benefits to others. This is so, despite such governmental activity being supposedly benevolent in intent. It worsens the lives of those compelled to pay these taxes. Such governmental redistribution undoubtedly receives the support of the mass of the electorate in such societies. But majority approval no more makes such taxation morally right than where what receives majority approval is the extermination or persecution of some ethnic or religious minority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Rawls, ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1985, vol. 14, p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I owe the criticisms that follow to David Gauthier, ‘Justice and Natural Endowment: Toward a Critique of Rawls’ Ideological Framework’, Social Theory and Practice, vol. 3, 1974, pp. 32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 276–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Gauthier, Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 253–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Nagel, Equality and Partiality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Dworkin, ‘Why Liberals Should Believe in Equality’, New York Review of Books, 3 February 1983, pp. 32–4, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Dworkin, ‘Liberalism’, in S. Hampshire (ed.), Public and Private Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kai Nielsen, Equality and Liberty: A Defence of Radical Egalitarianism (Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ted Honderich, Conservatism (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. A. Hayek, Individualism and the Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franz Brentano, The Foundation and Construction of Ethics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973), p. 332.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henry Sidgwick, The Methods of Ethics, Seventh Edition 1907 (London: Macmillan, 1963), p. 436.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Terry L. Anderson and Donald R. Deal, Free Market Environmentalism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1991), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. J. Thomson, ‘A Defence of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 2, 1971, pp. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Mill, ‘Utilitarianism’, in John Stuart Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedrich Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. John Gray, Liberalism (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For example, Joan Kennedy-Taylor, Reclaiming the Mainstream: Individualist Feminism Rediscovered (New York: Prometheus Books, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Susan Moller Okin, Women in Western Political Thought (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1979), pp. 3– 4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Caroline New and Miriam David, For the Children’s Sake (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985), pp. 41–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George Gilder, ‘The Myth of the Role Revolution’, in N. Davidson (ed.), Gender Sanity: The Case Against Feminism (Lanham: University Press of America, 1989), pp. 231–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For a review of the evidence, see Anne Moir and David Jessel, Brain Sex (London: Michael Joseph, 1989), especially ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For a good summary of this evidence, see, for example, Ellen Frankel Paul, Equity and Gender: The Comparable Worth Debate (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1989), ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 David Conway

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conway, D. (1995). Modern Liberalism. In: Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372191_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics