Skip to main content

Final Considerations

  • Chapter
World Citizenship and Government
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

It is to be hoped that the foregoing chapters display some coherence. The idea binding them together is composed of two related beliefs, which thread their way through two and a half millenia of intellectual history. These beliefs are that it would be desirable for states to be superseded or overarched by a universal order or global system of government; and, more intermittently in this history, that individuals should conceive of themselves as citizens of such a system. Yet no single word or set of words accurately conveys this persistent idea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Notes

  1. See, e.g., D. Archibugi and D. Held (eds), Cosmopolitan Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Brown, International Relations Theory (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Held, ‘Democracy: From CityStates to a Cosmopolitan Order?’, in D. Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Suganami, The Domestic Analogy and World Order Problems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Wight (ed. G. Wight and B. Porter), International Theory: The Three Traditions (London: Leicester University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, e.g., C. R. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979), especially his distinction between a cosmopolitan morality and a cosmopolitan political programme.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Küng, Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic (London: SCM Press, 1991) p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted, J. A. Hobson, Towards International Government (London: Allen & Unwin, 1915) p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, e.g., R. J. Glossop, World Federation? A Critical Analysis of Federal World Government (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1993) pp. 97–128, pp. 234–5 n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saint Augustine (trans. W. C. Greene), The City of God against the Pagans, vol. VI (London: Heinemann, 1969) XIX. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See O. Gierke, Political Theories of the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958) p. 128, para. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Text in E. Lewis (trans.) Medieval Political Ideas, vol. 2 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1954) pp. 471–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. Menut (ed.), Maistre Nicole Oresnie: Le Livre de Politiques d’Aristote (Philadelphia, PA: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, vol. 60, pt 6, 1970) VII. 10. 249d (translations from Oresme are the author’s).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quoted, A. Linklater, Men and Citizens in International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1982) p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. N. Walz, ‘Kant, Liberalism, and War’, American Political Science Review, vol. LVI (1962) p. 337. For Kant’s general hesitations about a world state, see also Chapter 3 above.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Metaphysics of Morals in H. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) §§52 & 53, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quoted in A. Schou, Histoire de l’Internationalisme, t. III (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1963) p. 371 (author’s translation).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Meinecke (trans. R. B. Kimber), Cosmopolitanism and the National State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Bumham, The Managerial Revolution (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1945) p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A few years after the publication of this book, the American political scientist Gerard J. Mangone wrote a fine general appraisal of the whole topic, entitled The Idea and Practice of World Government (New York: Columbia University Press, 1951). He discusses a number of objections. However, on the matter of world bureaucracy, he emphasises not so much its impracticability as the offensive totalitarian potential of such a necessary ‘gigantic, sprawling bureaucracy’ (p. 225; see also p. 30). This kind of argument has been fairly common. It should also be noted that, after the detonation of the atomic bombs, Burnham came to accept the advisability of a World Empire under US leadership. See The Struggle for the World (London: Cape, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Niebuhr, ‘The Illusion of World Government’, reprinted in Christian Realism and Political Problems (London: Faber, 1954) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quoted in D. Heater, Peace Through Education: The Contribution of the Council for Education in World Citizenship (Lewes: Falmer Press, 1984) p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For this four-fold classification of objections, see F. L. Schuman, The Commonwealth of Man (London: Hale, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Dostoyevsky (trans. D. Magarshack), The Brothers Karamazov, bk 5 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958) p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Berlin, Historical Inevitability (London: Oxford University Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. S. Lent, ‘The Development of United World Federalist Thought and Policy’, International Organisation, vol. 9 (1955) pp. 486–501, esp. p. 500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighbourhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. For an outline of this development, see, D. Oliver and D. Heater, Foundations of Citizenship (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994), ch. 7. There is the interesting parallel of dual citizenship in the Roman Empire — of Rome and of the citizen’s native city.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. P. Gardner, ‘What Lawyers mean by Citizenship’, in Commission on Citizenship, Encouraging Citizenship (London: HMSO, 1990) pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See, e.g., E. Boulding, Building a Global Civic Culture (New York: Teachers’ College Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Falk, ‘The Making of Global Citizenship’, in B. van Steenbergen (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship (London: Sage, 1994) pp. 131–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. Steward, ‘Citizens of Planet Earth’, in G. Andrews (ed.), Citizenship (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1991) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Donelan, ‘A Community of Mankind’, in J. Mayall (ed.), The Community of States (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982) p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See K. Booth, ‘Human wrongs and international relations’, International Affairs, vol. 71 (1995), esp. pp. 109–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Derek Heater

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heater, D. (1996). Final Considerations. In: World Citizenship and Government. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376359_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics