Abstract
The development of the European economy is a subject of remarkable interest in the current debate on the world economy. The performance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in terms of growth and unemployment is still unsatisfactory in comparison with that of the United States and of the European non-EMU countries, especially the United Kingdom. This has led some authors to investigate the existence of a deflationary bias in EMU monetary and fiscal policy rules (see for instance Altavilla and Marani, 2002). What is probably more significant, the concern that a restrictive monetary policy from the ECB might hinder the weak recovery of the EMU is shared by multilateral agencies such as the OECD (see Cotis, 2003) and the IMF (see chapter 1 and figure 1.5 in IMF, 2003).
The author thanks Francesco Carlucci and the participants at the European Union session of the IEA Congress (Lisbon, September 2002) for their helpful comments. Research assistance by Valeria Perotti and Antonio Pesce is gratefully acknowledged. This work was partially funded by the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ (research project on Institutions, Growth and International Coordination) and its Faculty of Economics (research project on The Linkage of Macroeconometric Models for International Economic Policy Simulation).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altavilla, C. and U. Marani (2002) ‘Is There a Deflationary Bias in European Economic Policies?’ Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali, no. 15 (Naples: Frederic II University).
Bagnai, A. and F. Carlucci (1998) ‘Un modello econometrico aggregate dell’Unione Europea’, Quaderni di Studi Europei, no. 1, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, pp. 13–85.
Bagnai, A. and F. Carlucci (2003) ‘An Aggregate Model for the European Union’, Economic Modelling, vol. 20, pp. 623–49.
Bean, C.R. (1994) ‘European Unemployment: a Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 32, pp. 573–619.
Bowden, R. and D. Turkington (1981) ‘A Comparative Study of Instrumental Variable Estimators for Nonlinear Simultaneous Models’, Journal of the American Statistical Society, vol. 76, pp. 985–96.
Cotis, J.R (2003) ‘Editorial: a Progressive but Unspectacular Recovery’, OECD Economic Outlook, no. 73, pp. vii–viii.
Douven, R. and M. Peters (1998) ‘GDP-spillovers in Multi-country Models’, Economic Modelling, vol. 15, pp. 163–95.
Dramais, A. (1986) ‘COMPACT — A Prototype Macroeconomic Model of the European Community in the World Economy’, European Economy, vol. 27, pp. 111–60.
Eichengreen, B. (1993) ‘European Monetary Unification’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 31, pp. 1321–57.
Fagan, C., J. Henry and R. Mestre (2001) ‘An Area-wide Model (AWM) for the Euro Area’, European Central Bank Working Paper, no. 42.
Frenkel, J. (1976) ‘A Monetary Approach to the Exchange Rate: Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 78, pp. 200–24.
Gregory, A.W. and B.R. Hansen (1996) ‘Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 70, pp. 99–126.
IMF (2003) World Economic Outlook — Growth and Institutions (Washington DC: IMF).
Kim, B.J. and S. Mo (1995) ‘Cointegration and the Long-run Forecast of the Exchange Rate’, Economics Letters, vol. 48, pp. 353–9.
Knight, M.D. and C. Wymer (1978) ‘A Macroeconomic Model of the United Kingdom’, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 25(4), pp. 742–78.
Laxton, D., P. Isard, H. Faruquee, E. Prasad and B. Turtelboom (1998) ‘MULTIMOD Mark III, The core dynamic and steady-state models’, IMF Occasional Paper no. 164.
Meyermans, E. and P. Van Brusselen (2000a) ‘The NIME Model — Specification and Estimation of the Demand Equations of the Household Sector’, Federal Planning Bureau Working Paper, Brussels, no. 8.
Meyermans, E. and P. Van Brusselen (2000b) ‘The NIME Model — Specification and Estimation of the Enterprise Sector’, Federal Planning Bureau Working Paper, Brussels, no. 10.
OECD (2002) OECD Statistical Compendium, 2002/2 (Paris: OECD).
OECD (2003a) OECD Statistical Compendium, 2003/1 (Paris: OECD).
OECD (2003b) Flashfile to the OECD Economic Outlook, no. 73, http://www.oecd.org/xls/M00040000/M00040707.xls
Razzak, W.A. and T. Grennes (1998) ‘The Long-run Nominal Exchange Rate: Specification and Estimation Issues’, Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper, no. 98/5.
Taylor, J. (1993) ‘Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy, vol. 39, pp. 195–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bagnai, A. (2004). Dynamic Paths of the European Economy: Simulations with an Aggregate Model of the EMU as a Part of the World Economy. In: Deardorff, A.V. (eds) The Past, Present and Future of the European Union. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522862_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522862_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3643-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52286-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)