Skip to main content
  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘old regime’ (ancien régime) was invented by the French revolutionaries to distinguish their brave new world from the monarchies they hoped to displace. Thanks to the convention that their revolution was a major turning point in world history and the birth of ‘modernity’, it has stuck as a general label for the period from 1648 to 1789. This time is generally defined, in contrast to the preceding and subsequent eras, as a time of relative stability under ‘absolute’ monarchies. Just as the period after 1789 is associated with ‘revolutionary warfare’, so the old regime is related to its own distinct form of ‘limited war’. This reflects a general assumption in historical writing and in social and political science that military and political organization are directly interrelated and that armies display the characteristics of the societies they serve (Lynn, 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Best, G. 1982. War and Society in Revolutionary Europe, 1770–1870, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black, J.M. 1999. Britain as a Military Power 1688–1815, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brewer, J. 1989. The Sinews of Power. War, Money and the English State 1688–1783, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhardt, J. 1992. Der DreiAigjahrige Krieg, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conway, S. 1995. The War of American Independence, 1775–1783, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corvisier, A. 1964. Larmee franfaise de la fin du xviie siecle au ministere de Choiseul: le soldat, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy, C. 1981. Russias Military Way to the West. Origins and Nature of Russian Military Power 1700–1800, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eichberg, E. 1977. ‘Geometrie als barocke Verhaltensnorm. Fortifikation und Exerzitien’, Zeitschrift fiir historische Forschung, 4, 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fann, W. 1977. ‘On the Infantryman’s Age in Eighteenth-Century Prussia’, Military Affairs, 41, 165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentiles, I. 1992. The New Model Army in England, Ireland and Scotland, 1645–1653, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanne, W., ed. 1986. Rangirrolle, Listen und Extracte … von Saldern Infanterie Regiment Anno 1771, Osnabriick.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hellie, R. 1990. ‘Warfare, Changing Military Technology and the Evolution of Muscovite Society’, in The Tools of War, ed. J.A. Lynn, Urbana, 74–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman, P.T. and Norberg, K., eds. 1994. Fiscal Crises, Liberty and Representative Government, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holmgaard, J. 1999. … uden at landet besvaeres. Studier over Fredrik 4.s Landmilits med saerligt henblik pa sorgsmalet om stavnsband og bonderkarlenes vilkar I ourigt, Norrejylland.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Houlding, J.A. 1981. Fit for Service: The Training of the British Army, 1715–1795, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kagan, F.W. and Higham, R., eds. 2002. The Military History of Tsarist Russia, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kampmann, C. 2001. Arbiter und Friedensstiftung. Die Ausseinandersetzung urn den politischen Schiedsrichter irn Europa der fruhen Neuzeit, Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiernan, V.G. 1957. ‘Foreign Mercenaries and Absolute Monarchy’, Past and Present, 11, 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kleinschmidt, H. 1999. ‘Mechanismus und Biologismus im Militärwesen des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts’, Aufklarung, 11, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Komlos, J. 1989. Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lesaffer, R. 2001. ‘War, Peace and Interstate Friendship and the Emergence of the Ius Publicum Europaeum’, in Frieden und Krieg in der friihen Neuzeit, ed. R.G. Asch and others, Munich, 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindegren, J. 2000. ‘Men, Money and Means’, in War and Competition between States, ed. P. Contamine, Oxford, 129–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luard, E. 1992. The Balance of Power. The System of International Relations, 1648–1815, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lund, E.A. 1999. War for the Every Day. Generals, Knowledge and Warfare in Early Modem Europe, 1680–1740, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lynn, J.A. 1997. Giant of the Grand Siecle. The French Army 1610–1715, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  26. — 1996. ‘The Evolution of Army Style in the Modern West, 800–2000’, International History Review, 18, 505–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McNeill, W.H. 1995. Keeping Together in Time. Dance and Drill in Human History, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. MOnch, W. 1999. “Rokokostrategen”. Ihr negativer Nachruhm in der Militärgeschichtsschreibung des 20. Jahrhunderts’, Aufklarung, 11, 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parrott, D. 2001. Richelieus Army. War, Government and Society in France, 1624–1642, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ralston, D.B. 1990. Importing the European Army. The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions in the Extra-European World, 1600–1914, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rink, M. 1999. VomPartheygangerzum Partisan. Die Konzeption des kleinen Krieges in Preu/.ien 1740–1813, Fankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rowlands, G. 2002. The Dynastic State and the Army under Louis XIV. Royal Service and Private Interest, 1661–1701, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  33. — 2001. ‘The Monopolisation of Military Power in France, 1515 to 1715’, in Frieden und Krieg in der fruhen Neuzeit, ed. R.G. Asch and others, Munich, 139–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schnitter, H. and Schmidt, T. 1987. Absolutismus und Heer. Zur Entwicklung des Militdrwesens im Spatfeudalismus, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scott, S.F. 1978. The Response of the Royal Army to the French Revolution. The Role and Development of the Line Army 1787–93, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Steegmann, A.T. Jr. 1985. ‘18th Century British Military Stature’, Human Biology, 57, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ten Raa, F.G.J. and others. 1911–59. Het staatsche Leger 1568–1795, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomson, J.E. 1994. Mercenaries, Pirates and Sovereigns. State-Building and Extra-Territorial Violence in Early Modern Europe, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tilly, C. 1992. Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1992, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wheeler, J.S. 1999. The Making of a World Power. War and the Military Revolution in Seventeenth-Century England, Stroud.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson, P.H. 2004. From Reich to Revolution. German History 1558–1806, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  42. — 2002. ‘The Politics of Military Recruitment in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, English Historical Review, 117, 536–68.

    Google Scholar 

  43. — 2000a. Absolutism in Central Europe, London.

    Google Scholar 

  44. — 2000b. ‘Social Militarisation in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, German History, 18, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 1998a. German Armies: War and German Politics, 1648–1806, London.

    Google Scholar 

  46. — 1998b. ‘War in German Thought from the Peace of Westphalia to Napoleon’, European History Quarterly, 28, 5–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, P.H. (2004). New Approaches under the Old Regime. In: Mortimer, G. (eds) Early Modern Military History, 1450–1815. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523982_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523982_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0697-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52398-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics