Abstract
Oscar Wilde believed that the self is multiple. One testament to the multiplicity of Oscar Wildes can be found in critical opinion of his aesthetics. To some he is an idealist who saw the mind as the focal point of all aesthetic interactions. To others he is a materialist concerned with “extreme sensuousness.”1 Evidence and combined critical opinion suggest that Wilde’s aesthetics are both idealist and materialist. Wilde, an eager student of Hegel at Oxford, paraphrased the philosopher’s ideas in his Commonplace Book, writing that “Every philosophy must be both idealist and realist: for without realism a philosophy would be void of substance, and matter without idealism would be void of form and truth … In the rhythm of both the line of dialectic finds its true course of progress.”2 Wilde, always a straddler of two worlds at once, is no different in his aesthetics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
JF. Codell’s “The Public Image of the Victorian Artist: Family Biographies,” The Journal of Pre-Raphaelite Studies 4 (1996), 5–34.
Matthew Arnold, Culture and Anarchy (New York: Macmillan, 1936), 45.
Matthew Arnold, “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time,” in Essays in Criticism (London: Macmillan, 1865), 25.
Margaret Oliphant, “The ByWays of Literature: Reading for the Million,” Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 84 (1858), 202.
Linda Dowling, The Vulgarization of Art: The Victorians and Aesthetic Democracy (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1995).
Karl Marx, Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963), 93.
Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971).
John Ruskin, Modern Painters (London: George Allen, 1900), 30.
John Ruskin, “Modern Manufacture and Design,” in The Two Paths (London: Cassell, 1907), 92.
W. Morris, “Art under Plutocracy,” in Art in Theory: 1815–1900, eds. Charles Harrison and Paul Wood (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), 763.
George Du Maurier, Trilby (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 288–289.
Max Nordau, Degeneration (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1968), 7.
Theodor Adorno, Aesthetic Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997), 239.
Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Englightenment (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972).
Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Illuminations (London: Fontana, 1973).
F.R. Leavis and Denys Thompson, Culture and Environment (London: Chatto and Windus, 1933), 81.
Raymond Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
Raymond Williams, Culture and Society (London: Chatto and Windus, 1958).
D. Bergman, ed. Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993).
Walter Pater, The Renaissance, 1873 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), xxix.
Rachel Bowlby, “Promoting Dorian Gray,” The Oxford Literary Review 9 (1987), 157–158.
Lawrence Danson, Wilde’s Intentions: The Artist in His Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997), 87.
Terry Eagleton, Saint Oscar (Lawrence Hill, Derry: Field Day, 1989).
Stephen Calloway, “Wilde and the Dandyism of the Senses,” in The Cambridge Companion to Oscar Wilde, ed. Pete Raby (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 34–54.
Regenia Gagnier, Idylls of the Marketplace: Oscar Wilde and the Victorian Public (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985), 3.
Joseph Donohue, “Recent Studies of Oscar Wilde,” Nineteenth Century Theatre 16.2 (1988), 126–136.
I. Small, “The Economies of Taste: Literary Markets and Literary Value in the Late Nineteenth Century,” ELT 39.1 (1996), 7–18.
D.F. McKenzie, Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (London: The British Library, 1986).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pease, A. (2004). Aestheticism and aesthetic theory. In: Roden, F.S. (eds) Palgrave Advances in Oscar Wilde Studies. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524309_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524309_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-2148-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52430-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)