Skip to main content

Rethinking the ‘New’ Public Diplomacy

  • Chapter
The New Public Diplomacy

Part of the book series: Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations ((SID))

Abstract

Events since 11 September 2001 have encouraged renewed debate on a dimension of diplomacy that, in varying forms, has a considerable pedigree. But, as with earlier debates concerning what is ‘old’ and ‘new’ in the practice of diplomacy, there is a danger here in failing to set the key issues within the framework of broader changes in world politics. More precisely, in the context of the theme of this book, current preoccupations with implementing public diplomacy strategies and developing new mechanisms within foreign ministries for overseeing them lead to the danger of misunderstanding the significance of public diplomacy and confusing its role as a mode of exercising power with the changing environments in which power is projected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (London: Thornton Butterworth, 1939), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Hamilton and R. Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 124–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Carlson and D. Comstock, Citizen Summitry: Keeping the Peace when it Matters Too Much to be Left to Politicians (Los Angeles CA: Tarcher, 1986), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Potter (ed.), Cyber-Diplomacy: Managing Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, R. A. O’Brien, M. Goetz, J. A. Scholte and M. Williams, Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hertz, ‘Political Realism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, June 1981, pp. 182–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Leonard, Public Diplomacy (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 2002), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. van Ham, ‘Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory’, Millennium, vol. 31, no. 2, 2002, pp. 249–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modem World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Cerny, ‘Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization’ Government and Opposition, spring 1997, pp. 251–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Olins, Trading Identities: Why Countries and Companies are Taking On Each Other’s Roles (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 1999), pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Challenges for the Finnish Foreign Service in the Twenty-First Century (Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 2001), pp. 6 and 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Bruter, ‘Diplomacy without a State: The External Delegations of the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, 1999, pp. 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See J. Nye, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 1990); and

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Perseus, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. R. Mead, ‘America’s Sticky Power’, Foreign Policy, March/April 2004, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Comment made by Waring Partridge, in D. Bollier, The Rise of Netpolitik: How the Internet is Changing International Politics and Diplomacy, a report of the eleventh annual Aspen Institute round table on Information Technology (Washington DC: Aspen Institute, 2003), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Grimes, ‘US Universities Failed by Visa Process’, Financial Times, 12 May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Cooper, ‘China has Discovered its Own Economic Consensus’, Financial Times, 8 May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. McGregor, ‘China’s Success Inspires Envy and Awe’, Financial Times, 28 May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Ferguson, ‘Power’, Foreign Policy, January/February, 2003, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Nye, ‘America’s Power: The New Rome Meets the New Barbarians’, The Economist, 23 March 2002, p. 24;

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Reinhard and T. Miller, ‘A Business Problem’, International Herald Tribune, 27 May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Manheim, Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Leonard and V. Alakeson, Going Public: Diplomacy for the Information Society (London: Foreign Policy Centre, 2000), pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Woollacott, ‘“Soft Power” Can Win the Battle for Hearts and Minds’, The Guardian, 2 August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Council on Foreign Relations, Finding America’s Voice: A Strategy for Reinvigorating US Public Diplomacy, report of an independent Task Force (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Hill, The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Stone, Networks, Second-Track Diplomacy and Regional Cooperation: The Role of Southeast Asian Think Tanks, paper presented to the 38th International Studies Convention, Toronto, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Reinecke, Global Public Policy: Governing without Government? (Washington DC: Brookings, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. Reinecke, ‘The Other World Wide Web: Global Public Policy Networks’, Foreign Policy, vol. 117, 2000, pp. 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  33. In a recent book, Anne-Marie Slaughter argues the case for a network approach to diplomacy but does so in the context of exclusively governmental networks. See A-M. Slaughter, A New World Order (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Hocking, ‘Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond “Newness” and “Decline”’, in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (London: Macmillan, 1999), pp. 21–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Bob, ‘Merchants of Morality’, Foreign Policy, March/April 2002, pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Many diplomats have noted how the ‘outreach’ function has dramatically expanded. See, for example, K. Rana, Inside Diplomacy (New Delhi: Manas Publications, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Cohen, ‘Reflections on the New Global Diplomacy’, in J. Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1999), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Brian Hocking

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the ‘New’ Public Diplomacy. In: Melissen, J. (eds) The New Public Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics