Abstract
The European Union (EU) is a union of democracies, and most observers would agree that the Member States constitute the most important fora of democratic life in Europe’s multilevel system. However, as more and more decision-making competencies are shifted away from the Member States and to the EU, and national autonomy is increasingly being curtailed by EU law, the notion that the Union can base its democratic legitimacy mainly on the legitimacy of the Member State governments becomes ever less convincing. There are hence good reasons to ask why the most important institutional principles associated with democracy in the Member States — direct election of all core legislators and full accountability of all rulers to the electorate — cannot be transferred to the EU level as well. In other words: can the EU construct institutions that would base its legitimacy on genuinely supranational democratic procedures, analogous to those known from the Member States?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Grimm, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’, European Law Journal, 1 (1995) pp. 282–302
D. Miller, ‘The Left, the Nation-State, and European Citizenship’, Dissent, 45 (Summer 1998) pp. 47–51
C. Offe, ‘The Democratic Welfare State in an Integrating Europe’, in M. T. Greven and L. W. Pauly (eds). Democrat beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000) pp. 63–89
E W. Scharpf, ‘Economic Integration, Democracy and Welfare State’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (1997) pp. 18–36).
H. Kaelble, A Social History of Western Europe, 1880–1980 (Dublin: Gill and MacMillan, 1990)
H. Kaelble, ‘Social Particularities of Nineteenth-and Twentieth-Century Europe’, in H. Kaelble (ed.). The European Way: European Societies during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Oxford: Berghahn, 2004) pp. 276–317.
U. Beck,’ so macht Gleichheit Ungleiche aus uns allen: Und kann es so etwas wie eine europäische Gesellschaft überhaupt geben? [Thus Equality Makes Us All Unequal: And Can Such a Thing as a European Society Exist at All?]’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8 October 2004, p. 36; C. Crouch, Social Change in Western Europe (Oxfor: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 393–409
M. Mann, ‘Is There a Society Called Euro?’ in R. Axtmann (ed.). Globalization and Europe: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (London: Pinter, 1998), pp. 184–207.
C. Offe, ‘Is There, or Can There Be, a “European Society”?’, in I. Katenhusen and W. Lamping (eds), Demokratien in Europa: der Einfluss der europäischen Integration auf Institutionenwandel und neue Konturen des demokratischen Verfassungsstaates [Democracies in Europe: the Impact of European Integration on Institutional Change and New Contours of Constitutional Democracy] (Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 2003), pp. 71–89.
G. W. E Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1821]).
K. Marx, ‘On the Jewish Question’, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 3 (New York: International Publishers, 1975 [1844]), pp. 146–74.
E.-W. Böckenförde, Recht — Staat — Freiheit: Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, Staatstheorie und Verfassungsgeschichte [Law — State — Liberty: Studies on Legal Philosophy, State Theory and Constitutional History] (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1991), p. 217.
R. Barker, ‘Legitimacy, Legitimation, and the European Union: What Crisis?’, in P. Craig and R. Rawlings (eds), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 157–74.
A. Moravcsik, Tn Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (2002) pp. 615–17.
M. Bach, ‘Die europäische Integration und die unerfüllten Versprechen der Demokratie [European Integration and the Unfulfilled Promises of Democracy]’, in H. D. Klingemann and E Neidhardt (eds), Zur Zukunft der Demokratie: Herausforderungen im Zeitalter der Globalisierung [On the Future of Democracy: Challenges in an Age of Globalization] (Berlin: Edition Sigma, 2000), pp. 185–213
H. Brunkhorst, ‘A Polity without a State? European Constitutionalism between Evolution and Revolution’, in E. O. Eriksen, J. Fossum and A.J. Menendez (eds), Developing a Constitution for Europe (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 88–105.
For more details, see A. Hurrelmann, Verfassung und Integration in Europa: Wege zu einer supranationalen Demokratie [Constitution and Integration in Europe: Pathways towards Supranational Democracy] (Frankfurt: Campus, 2005), pp. 102–35.
J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971)
J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988)
C. Pateman, ‘Contributing to Democracy’, Review of Constitutional Studies, 4 (1998) pp. 191–212).
J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1989).
M. Heidenreich, ‘Regional Inequalities in the Enlarged Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (2003) pp. 313–33).
On this idea of a Europeanization of national public spheres, see J. Gerhards, ‘Westeuropäische Integration und die Schwierigkeit der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit [West European Integration and the Difficult Emergence of a European Public Sphere]’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 22 (1993) pp. 96–110
J. Gerhards, ‘Europäisierung von Ökonomie und Politik und die Trägheit der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit [Europeanization of Economy and Politics and Inertia in the Emergence of a European Public Sphere]’, in M. Bach (ed.). Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften [The Europeanization of National Societies] (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2000), pp. 277–305.
See for example M. van de Steeg, ‘Eine europäische Öffentlichkeit? Die Diskussion um die Osterweiterung der EU [A European Public Sphere? The Discussion about the EU’s Eastern Enlargement]’, Berliner Debatte Initial, 13(5/6) (2002) pp. 57–66
H.-J. Trenz, ‘Ein Rauschen geht durch den Blätterwald: EU-Präsident Prodi und die Entstehung einer europäischen Publizistik [A Rustle in the Papers: EU-President Prodi and the Emergence of a European Press]’, Berliner Debatte Initial, 13(5/6) (2002) pp. 24–35
S. Tobler ‘Transnationale Kommunikationsverdichtungen im Streit um die internationale Steuerpolitik [Transnational Condensations of Communication in the Controversy about International Tax Policy]’, Berliner Debatte Initial, 13(5/6) (2002) pp. 67–78.
See for example the contributions in R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse and M. B. Brewer (eds). Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).
F. Nullmeier, ‘Distributive Verfassungsreform oder: Ist Verteilungsgerechtigkeit verfaßbar? [Distributive Constitutional Reform, or: Can Distributive Justice be Constitutionalized?]’, in J. Gebhardt and R. Schmalz-Bruns (eds), Demokratie, Verfassung und Nation: Die politische Integration moderner Gesellschaften [Democracy, Constitution, and Nation: the Political Integration of Modern Societies] (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1994), pp. 175–96.
J. Gerhards, ‘Das Öffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU im Horizont normativer Öffentlichkeitstheorien [The Deficient EU Public Sphere in the Context of Normative Theories of the Public Sphere]’, in H. Kaelble, M. Kirsch and A. Schmidt-Gernig (eds). Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert [Transnational Public Spheres and Identities in the 20th Century] (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 2002), pp. 135–58
J. Habermas, ‘Why Europe Needs a Constitution’, in E. O. Eriksen, J. Fossum and A. J. Menendez (eds). Developing a Constitution for Europe (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 19–34.
A. von Bogdandy, ‘Europäische und nationale Identität: Integration durch Verfassungsrecht?’ [European and National Identity: Integration through Constitutional Law?], Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, 62 (2003) pp. 156–93 edH. Vorländer (ed.), Integration durch Verfassung [Integration through Constitutionalism] (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2002).
A. von Bogdandy, ‘The European Constitution and European Identity: Potentials and Dangers of the IGC’s Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe’, in J. H. H. Weiler and C. L. Eisgruber (eds), Altneuland: the EU Constitution in Contextual Perspective, Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 05/2004 (New York: New York University School of Law, 2004).
A. Maurer, Optionen und Grenzen der Einbindung der nationalen Parlamente in die künftige EU-Verfassungsstruktur [Including National Parliaments into the Future Constitutional Structure of the EU — Options and Restrictions], SWP-Studie S 29 (Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2002).
M. Zürn, ‘Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-State: the EU and Other International Institutions’, European Journal of International Relations, 6 (2000) pp. 183–221).
On the idea of a direct-democratic veto, see H. Abromeit, Democracy in Europe: Legitimising Politics in a Non-State Polity (Oxford: Berghahn, 1998).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Achim Hurrelmann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hurrelmann, A. (2007). Is There a European Society? Social Conditions for Democracy in the EU. In: DeBardeleben, J., Hurrelmann, A. (eds) Democratic Dilemmas of Multilevel Governance. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591783_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591783_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35289-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59178-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)