Abstract
Subjectivists take moral properties to be reducible to psychological properties and relations. They think that for an object to be good is for some person or group to have (or be disposed to have) some psychological attitude or reaction towards it. Here are a few examples of subjectivist theories; in each case, the ‘=’ sign indicates that the expression on the right explains what it is for the expression on the left hand side to be true:1
-
a)
x is good = The speaker believes that x is good.
-
b)
x is good = The speaker approves of x.
-
c)
x is right = Society approves of x.
-
d)
x is right = x accords with God’s wishes.2
Theories (a) and (b) make morality relative to the individual; that is, they imply that two different individuals may correctly call different things ‘good’. According to (a), when I say something is good, I mean that I believe it is good; when you say something is good, you mean that you believe it is good. Theory (c) makes morality relative to a culture; it implies that members of different societies may correctly call different things ‘right’, though two members of a single society may not.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 Michael Huemer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huemer, M. (2005). Subjectivism. In: Ethical Intuitionism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597051_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597051_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-57374-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59705-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)