Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managerial Wisdom in Corporate Governance: The (Ir)Relevance of Accountability and Responsibility at Corporate Boards

  • Chapter
Wise Management in Organisational Complexity

Abstract

Our capitalist market system today has been characterised by the sins of arrogance, greed, untrustworthiness and callousness. Is it possible that wise decisions — that is, making ‘right’ judgments that lead to good actions and beneficial results — may be able to help in addressing the daunting challenges of our corporations within the prevailing market mechanisms?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrawal, A., and S. Chadha (2005). ‘Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals’. Journal of Law and Economics, 48: 371–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardelt, M. (2003). ‘Empirical Assessment of a Three-dimensional Wisdom Scale’. Research on Aging, 25(3): 275–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1984). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1992). The Politics. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, S.M. (2008). The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P.H., and U.M. Staudinger (2000). ‘Wisdom: A Metaheuristic (Pragmatic) to Orchestrate Mind and Virtue toward Excellence’. American Psychologist, 55: 122–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, Erik (2004). Corporate Governance: Financial Responsibility, Controls and Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L., and J. Fried (2004). Pay without Performance. The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., and B. Black (2002). ‘The Non-correlation between Board Independence and Long-term Firm Performance’. Journal of Corporation Law (Winter): 231–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, S., and B. Bolton (2008). ‘Corporate Governance and Firm Performance’. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14: 257–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R., and A. McKee (2005). Resonant Leadership: Renewing Yourself and Connecting with Others through Mindfulness, Hope, and Compassion. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.D., and M.L. Caylor (2006). ‘Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation’. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25: 409–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, J. (2010). ‘A Case for Global Governance Theory: Practitioners Avoid It, Academics Narrow It, the World Needs It’. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2): 149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charan, R. (2005). Boards That Deliver: Advantages Corporate Governance from Compliance to Competitive Advantage. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charan, R. (2009). Owning Up: The 14 Questions Every Board Member Needs to Ask. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, D.H., and S.L. Gillan (eds) (2009). Global Corporate Governance. Columbia Business School Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T. (2007). Corporate Governance. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P., and E. Carusetta (2004). ‘Developing Authenticity as a Transformative Process’. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(4): 276–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimma, W. (2002). Excellence in the Boardroom: Best Practices in Corporate Directorship. Wiley & Sons, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.L., and L.E. Preston (1995). ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., and M. Jensen (1983). ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 310–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, M., and R.M.M.I. Chowdhury (2010). ‘The Relationship between Spiritual Well-being and Ethical Orientations in Decision-making: An Empirical Study with Business Executives in Australia’. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (3): 211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (ed.) (2010). Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E., L. Dunham and J. McVea (2007). ‘Strategic Ethics — Strategy, Wisdom, and Stakeholder Theory: A Pragmatic and Entrepreneurial View of Stakeholder Strategy’. In E.H. Kessler and J.R. Bailey (eds), Handbook of Organisational and Managerial Wisdom, pp. 151–80. Sage, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’. New York Times Magazine (13 September): 32–3, 122, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.L., B.J. Avolio, F. Luthans, D.R. May and F. Walumbwa (2005). ‘Can You See the Real Me? A Self-based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development’. Leadership Quarterly, 16: 343–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelter, M. (2009). ‘The Dark Side of Shareholder Influence: Managerial Autonomy and Stakeholder Orientation in Comparative Corporate Governance’. Harvard International Law Journal, 50(1): 129–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M.C. (2010). ‘Keeping Your Colleagues Honest’. Harvard Business Review (March): 114–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J.N. (2007). ‘The Rise of Independent Directors in the United States, 1950–2005: Of Shareholder Value and Stock Market Prices’. Stanford Law Review, 59: 1465–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayling, A.C. (2007). Truth, Meaning and Realism. Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2012). What Matters Now: How to Win in a World of Relentless Change, Ferocious Competition, and Unstoppable Innovation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, J.M. (2003). ‘Dynamics or Organizational Wisdom’. Working paper, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1986). ‘Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers’. American Economic Review, 76: 323–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (2002). ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W.H. Meckling (1976). ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’. Journal of Financial Economics. Repr. in Clarke (ed.) (2004), Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance, pp. 58–63. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and D. Lovallo (1993). ‘Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: Perspectives of Risk Taking’. Management Science, 39: 24–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (2009). Supercorp: How Vanguard Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. (2011). ‘How Great Companies Think Differently’. Harvard Business Review (November): 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E.H., and J.R. Bailey (eds) (2007). Handbook of Organisational and Managerial Wisdom. Sage, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (1998). ‘Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure’. Journal of Law and Economics, 20: 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, A. (2009). ‘Realizing Wisdom Theory in Complex Learning Networks’. e-Learning, 7(1): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D., and B. Tayan (2011). Corporate Governance Matters: A Closer Look at Organisational Choice and Their Consequences. Financial Times Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. (2012). Winning Investors Over. Surprising Truths about Honesty, Earnings, Guidance, and Other Ways to Boost Your Stock Price. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J.W., and R.C. Clark (2008). ‘Leading from the Boardroom’. Harvard Business Review (April): 104–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J.R. (2008). Corporate Governance: Promises Kept, Promises Broken. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, J. (2011). ‘What Conscious Capitalism Really Is’. California Management Review, 53(3): 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malan, L.-C., and M.P. Kriger (1998). ‘Making Sense of Managerial Wisdom’. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7 (3): 242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., D. Rooney and K.B. Boal (2009). ‘Wisdom Principles as a Metatheoretical Basis for Evaluating Leadership’. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi (2011). ‘The Wise Leader’. Harvard Business Review (May): 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwoll, L., and M. Perlmutter (1990). ‘The Study of Wise Persons: Integrating a Personality Perspective’. In R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Wisdom: Its Nature, Origins and Development, pp. 160–77. Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L.S. (1994). ‘Managing for Organisational Integrity’. Harvard Business Review, 72: 106–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameshwar, S. (2006). ‘Inventing Higher Purpose through Suffering: The Transformation of the Transformational Leader’. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 454–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. (2003). ‘Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices’. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W., and J. Qi Zhou (2005). ‘How Network Strategies and Institutional Transitions Evolve in Asia’. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 321–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). ‘Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organisation and Its Environment’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., and M. Kramer (2006). ‘Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’. Harvard Business Review (December): 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., and M. Kramer (2011). ‘Creating Shared Value’. Harvard Business Review (January–February): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R.G. (2010). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2007). ‘Corporate Directors and Social Responsibility: Ethics versus Shareholder Value’. Journal of Business Ethics, 73: 319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N. (2011). Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2011). ‘Practical Wisdom and Organisations’. Research in Organisational Behavior, 31: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J. (2012). Finance and the Good Society. Princeton University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, S. (2002). ‘Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment between Manager’s Words and Deeds as a Researcher Focus’. Organisational Science, 13 (1): 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenfeld, J. (2004). ‘Good Governance and the Misleading Myths of Bad Metrics’. Academy of Management Education, 9 (1): 108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1998). ‘A Balance Theory of Wisdom’. Review of General Psychology, 2(4): 347–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. (1993). ‘On Having a Morality in Common’. In G. Outka and J.R. Reeder (eds), Prospects for a Common Morality, pp. 215–35. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. (2003). Ethics beyond Babel. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., G. Weaver, D. Gibson and B. Toffler (1999). ‘Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Works and What Hurts’. California Management Review, 42(2): 128–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevinyo-Rodriguez, R. (2007). Integrity: a systems theory classification. Journal of Management History, 13(1) 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2008). ‘(Ir)Relevance of Integrity in Organisations’. Public Integrity, 10(2): 135–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2009). Gifts, Corruption and Philanthropy: The Ambiguity of Gift Practices in Business. Peter Lang, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P. (2010). ‘Giving Voice to a Culture of Silence: From a Culture of Compliance to a Culture of Integrity’. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2): 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhezen, P., P. Notowidigdo and E. Riyana Hardjapamekas (eds) (2012). Is Corporate Governance Relevant? How Good Corporate Governance Practices Affect Indonesian Organizations. University of Indonesia Press, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P., and J. Zinkin (2005). Corporate Governance: Mastering Business in Asia. John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1996). ‘Truth in Ethics’. In B. Hooker (ed.), Truth in Ethics, pp. 19–34. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Peter Verhezen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. China Europe International Business School, China

    Mike J. Thompson  & David Bevan  & 

Copyright information

© 2013 Peter Verhezen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verhezen, P. (2013). Managerial Wisdom in Corporate Governance: The (Ir)Relevance of Accountability and Responsibility at Corporate Boards. In: Thompson, M.J., Bevan, D. (eds) Wise Management in Organisational Complexity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002655_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation