Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regulatory Instruments, Strategies and Techniques — Sticks and Carrots

  • Chapter
Contemporary Challenges in Regulating Global Crises

Part of the book series: International Political Economy ((IPES))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Essentially, the discussion of regulatory instruments, strategies and techniques is about the contextual application of theory to specific regulatory challenges. The success of regulatory policy will be a pressing measure of selection and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. and Murphy, B. (1995) ‘Relations of Shyness and Low Sociability to Regulation and Emotionality’, Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 68/3: 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See Cotterrell, R. (2006) ‘Community as a Legal Concept? Some Uses of a Law-and-Community Approach in Legal Theory’, No Foundations 2: 15–26 (or in R. Cotterrell (ed.) Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 17–28; Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 95/2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Black, J. (2002b) ‘Critical Reflections on Regulation’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a discussion of this position, see Lobel, O. (2004) ‘The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought’, Minnesota Law Review 89: 262–390.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart, R. (1986) ‘Reconstitutive Law’, Modern Law Review 46: 86–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henham, R. and Findlay, M. (2010) Beyond Punishment: Achieving International Criminal Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahlquist, J. and Prakash, A. (2006) ‘Business Strategy in a Changing Nonmarket Environment’, in S. Vachani (ed.) Transformations in Global Governance: Implications for Multinationals and Other Stakeholders. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 96–119, at p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skelcher, C. and Torfing, J. (2010) ‘Improving Democratic Governance through Institutional Design: Civic Participation and Democratic Ownership in Europe’, Regulation and Governance 4/1: 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Black, J. (2002c) ‘Regulatory Conversations’, Journal of Law and Society 29/1: 163–196, at p. 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. For instance see Black, J. (1996) ‘Constitutionalising Self-regulation’, The Modern Law Review 59/1: 24–55, at p. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, C. (2006) ‘The “Compliance” Trap: The Moral Message in Responsive Regulatory Enforcement’, Law and Society Review 40/3: 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, K., Tyler, T. and Curtis, A. (2009) ‘Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law?’, Regulation & Governance 3/1: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeung, K. (2004) Securing Compliance: A Principled Approach. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sunstein, C. (1996) ‘On the Expressive Function of the Law’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144/5: 2021–2053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility; A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26/1: 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. (2003) ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48/2: 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Husted, B. (2003) ‘Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: To Contribute, Collaborate or Internalise?’, Long Range Planning 36/5: 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braithwaite, V. (2006) ‘Ten Things You Needed to Know about Regulation But Never Wanted to Ask’, Australian Law Librarian 14/3: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. and Sinclair, D. (1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Teubner, G. (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law & Society Review 17/2: 239–286, at p. 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baldwin, R. and Black, J. (2008) ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, The Modern Law Review 71/1: 59–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. and Pearson, H. (eds.) (1957) Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory. Glencoe: The Free Press, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lie, J. (1997) ‘Sociology of Markets’, Annual Review of Sociology 23: 349–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doh, J. (2006) ‘Global Governance, Social Responsibility and Corporate-NGO Collaboration’, in Vachani (ed.), pp. 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rondinelli, D. and London, T. (2003) ‘How Corporations and Environmental Groups Collaborate: Assessing Cross-sector Alliances and Collaborations’, The Academy ofManagement Executive 17/1: 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Doh (2006), p. 214. See also Westley, F. and Vredenburg, H. (1991) ‘Strategic Bridging: The Collaboration between Environmentalists and Business in the Marketing of Green Products’, Journal of Applied Behaviour Science 27/1: 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McGuire, S. and Lawton, T. (2006) ‘Does the WTO Matter?’, in Vachani (ed.), pp. 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kudrle, R. (2006) ‘The Globalization of Competition Policy’, in Vachani (ed.), pp. 22–48, at p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rufin, C. (2006) ‘Multilateral Institutions and Market-oriented Reform: Have They Changed the Nature of MNC-government Relations?’, in Vachani (ed.), pp. 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Williamson, J. (1990) What Washington Means by Policy Reform’, in J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sherburne, J. (1972) John Ruskin, or the Ambiguities of Abundance: A Study in Social and Economic Criticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Ogus, A. (1995) ‘Rethinking Self-regulation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15: 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Discussed in detail in Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. and Vihma, A. (2009) ‘Comparing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Global Hard and Soft Law: An Analytical Framework’, Regulation & Governance 3/4: 400–420. Hard to soft is determined against measure of obligation, precision and delegation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sunstein, C. (1986) ‘Legal Interference with Private Preferences’, University of Chicago Law Review 53/4: 1129–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parker, C. (2007) ‘Meta-regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu and T. Campbell (eds.) The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gunningham, N. and Sinclair, D. (1999) ‘Integrative Regulation: A Principlebased Approach to Environmental Policy’, Law & Social Inquiry 24/4: 853–896, pp. 856–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cotterrell, R. (1989) The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London: Butterworths, p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Singapore Management University, Singapore

    Mark Findlay (Professor of Law, Professor of Criminal Justice)

  2. University of Sydney, Australia

    Mark Findlay (Professor of Law, Professor of Criminal Justice)

Authors
  1. Mark Findlay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2013 Mark Findlay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Findlay, M. (2013). Regulatory Instruments, Strategies and Techniques — Sticks and Carrots. In: Contemporary Challenges in Regulating Global Crises. International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009111_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation