Skip to main content

At the Margins: Ophelia in Modern and Contemporary Photography

  • Chapter
The Afterlife of Ophelia

Abstract

Displaced to the somber back room of a bar in Miller’s letter quoted above; vanishing down the long corridors of a castle in Laurence Olivier’s film; or partially submerged in a bath or in a river following the style inaugurated by John Everett Millais, Ophelia lives at the margins of our memory of Shakespeare’s play, as liminal and peripheral as one of Hamlet’s subplots.4

As for Ophelia, she is inseparable in my mind from a tow-haired girl who was sitting in the back room and whom I had passed on my way to the toilet every now and then. I remember the pathetic, stupefied look on this girl’s face; when later I saw somewhere an illustration of Ophelia floating face up, the hair braided and tangled in the pond lilies, I thought of the girl in the back room of the bar, her eyes glazed, her hair strawlike, as Ophelia’s.

(Henry Miller, “A Letter to Hamlet”)1

Le mystère — si l’on veut à tout prix, pour les besoins du discours, donner une figure à ce qui, par définition, n’en pa — peut être représenté comme une marge.

(marginalia, Derrida’s Marges de la philosophie)2

Ofelia: Me gusta. Es mi oportunidad. Nunca tuve buenas frases. Me robaron el papel. Ni siquiera muero en escena.

(Angelica Liddell, La falsa suicida)3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Henry Miller’s “A Letter to Hamlet,” The Cosmological Eye (New York: New Directions, 1939) 233. This letter was written in 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angélica Liddell, La falsa suicida, ARTEA 2011 (Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, 2011) 4. For the full text of Liddell’s play, see (http://artesescenicas.uclm.es/archivos_subidos/textos/175/Angelica%20Liddell-La%20falsa%20suicida.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See A. C. Bradley’s comments, Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth (1901; Teddington: The Echo Library, 2006) 84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elaine Showalter, “Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism,” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman (New York and London: Methuen, 1985) 77–94; 75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the “Ophelia Phenomenon,” see Alan R. Young, “The Ophelia Phenomenon,” Hamlet and the Visual Arts 1709–1900, ed. Alan R. Young (London: Associated University Press, 1984) 279–345.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bram Dijkstra, Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of Feminine Evil in Fin-de-siècle Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988) 42. Emphasis mine.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wessel Krull, “The Drowned Bride,” Ophelia: Sehnsucht, Melancholia and Desire for Death, ed. Catrien Santing, Flos Wildshut, and Krien Clevis (Amsterdam: Uitgeverij De Buitenkant 2009) 142–89; 142.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Michael Bartram, The Pre-Raphaelite Camera: Aspects of Victorian Photography (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1989) 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Kaara Peterson, “Framing Ophelia: Representation and the Pictorial Tradition,” Mosaic: A Journal for the Lnterdisciplinary Study of Literature 31.3 (September 1998): 1–24; 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kimberly Rhodes, Ophelia and Victorian Visual Culture (Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate, 2008) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rhodes, Ophelia and Victorian Visual Culture 128. See also Georges Didi-Huberman, Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière (Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pascale Aesbischer, Shakespeare’s Violated Bodies: Stage and Screen Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). Aesbischer refers to the RSC production of Hamlet, directed by Ron Daniel, in which a new character, the gravedigger’s daughter, was going to be included.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Jacques Derrida, “Tympan,” Margins of Philosophy (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1982) x–xxix.

    Google Scholar 

  14. In the fusion of her body with the landscape, Mendieta writes, Through my earth/body sculptures I become one with the earth … I become an extension of nature and nature becomes an extension of my body. This obsessive act of reasserting my ties with the earth is really the reactivation of primeval beliefs … [in] an omnipresent female force, the after-image of being encompassed within the womb. See her 1981 unpublished statement, qtd. in Anne Raine, “Embodied Geographies,” Generations & Geographies in the Visual Arts, ed. Griselda Pollock (London: Routledge, 1996) 228–52; 26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. María Ruido, Ana Mendieta (Hondarribia: Barcelona, 2002) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mieke Bal, Quoting Caravaggio (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) 8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gregory Crewdson, qtd. in Carol Solomon Kiefer, “The Myth and Madness of Ophelia,” The Myth and Madness of Ophelia, ed. Carol Solomon Kiefer (Amherst, MA: Mead Art Museum, Amherst College, 2001) 11–39; 31.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eugènia Barcells, Ophelia: variacions sobre una imatge (Barcelona: department d’art de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Estrella de Diego, “Ophelia’s Fall or How to Avoid Worse Trouble When Gardening,” Ofeliasy Ulises, ed. Rafael Doctor (Bremen: Barcelona, 2001) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kate Bush directly connects Cameron’s Ophelia with van Meene’s portraits: Ophelia is pictured turning her head, her hair messy and her mouth open, minute gestures of agitation that contrast with the perfectly focused rose at her neck-and thus she immediately characterizes Shakespeare’s tragic heroine, a figure of simultaneous beauty and madness. For van Meene, likewise, the model is important insofar as she, or he, is capable of incarnating and projecting a particular expressive or physical quality. Kate Bush, “Prologue,” Hellen van Meene: Portraits, ed. Andrew Hiller (New York: Aperture Foundation, 2004) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Michael Fried, Why Photography Matters as Art as Never Before (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2008) 212. For a deeper insight in the concepts of “theatricality” and “self-absorption,” see also

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Fried, Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Laura Noble, “The Adventures of Guille and Belinda and the Enigmatic Meaning of Their Dreams,” Foam, International Photography Magazine 10 (2007): 55–74 and Alessandra Sanguinetti’s official website (http://alessandrasanguinetti.com).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Kaara L. Peterson and Deanne Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perni, R. (2012). At the Margins: Ophelia in Modern and Contemporary Photography. In: Peterson, K.L., Williams, D. (eds) The Afterlife of Ophelia. Reproducing Shakespeare: New Studies in Adaptation and Appropriation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016461_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics