Skip to main content

Effective Supervision of Young Offenders

  • Chapter
What Works in Offender Compliance

Abstract

A lot has been written about what works in interventions with offenders (e.g. Andrews and Bonta 2008; McIvor and Raynor 2008; McNeill et al. 2010). In recent years there have also been a small number of studies focusing on what works in the routine supervision of offenders on probation. This is the focus of this chapter, which draws on the findings of a study that was conducted in New South Wales, Australia. The terminology for ‘probation’ and who delivers probation supervision varies. The term probation is used in this article to refer to community-based supervision whether it relates to probation orders, parole orders, supervised bonds or other legal community-based orders which involve supervision. Similarly, the term ‘probation officer’ is used to refer to probation officers, community corrections officers, parole officers, juvenile justice workers or counsellors, or others who supervise offenders in the community under court orders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AIC Australian Institute of Criminology. (2010) Australian crime: Facts & figures 2010 Available at: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/facts/1–20/2010/6_ corrections.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • AIHW. (2011) Juvenile Justice in Australia 2008–2009. Juvenile justice series no. 7. Cat. no. JUV 7. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id= 10737418606&tab= 2 (Accessed 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. and Bonta, J. (2008) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Keissling, J. J., Russell, R. J. and Grant, B. A. (1979) Volunteers and the One-to-One Supervision of Adult Probationers. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2010) Probation and Parole in the United States, 2009 http//www_his.gnv/index.cfrn?tv=nhdetailFriid=2233 (accessed 7 July 20111.

  • Bonta, J. and Andrews, D. A. (2007) Risk need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Public Safety Canada. http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/Rick Need _2007–06 e. pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J. and Andrews, D. (2010) ‘Viewing Offender Assessment and Rehabilitation Through the Lens of the Risk-Needs-Responsivity Model’. in F. McNeil, P. Raynor and C. Trotter (Eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Devon: Willan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T.-L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L. and Li, J. (2011). ‘An Experimental Demonstration of Training Probation Officers in Evidence-Based Community Supervision’. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 38, 1127–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, C. and Andrews, D. A. (2004) ‘The Importance of Staff Practice in Delivering Effective Correctional Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature’. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C., Pealer, J., Smith, P. and Latessa, E. (2006) ‘Adhering to the Risk and Need Principles: Does it Matter for Supervision-Based Programs?’ Federal Probation 70(3), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclvor, G. and Raynor, P. (Eds) (2008) Developments in Social Work with Offenders. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil E, Raynor, P. and Trotter, C. (Eds) (2010) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Devon: Willan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F., Batchelor, S., Burnett, R. and Knox, J. (2005) 21st Century Social Work: Reducing Re-Offending: Key Practice Skills. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government Human Services: Juvenile Justice. (2009/10) Annual Report Statistics 2009/10. http://www.djj.nsw.gov.au/publications.htm

  • Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P. and Vanstone, M. (2010) ‘Skills and Strategies in Probation Supervision: The Jersey Study’. in F. McNeil, P. Raynor and C. Trotter (Eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Devon: Willan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C., Vanbenschoten, S., Alexander, M. and Lowenkamp, C. (2011) ‘A Random (almost) Study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Re-arrest (Reducing recidivism through intentional design’. Federal Probation 75, 2. http://www.uscourts.gov/viewer .aspx?doc= /uscourts/FederalCourts/PPS/Fedprob/2011–09/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. R., Lowenkamp, C. T., VanBenschoten, S., Alexander, M., Holsinger, A. M. and Oleson, J. C. (2012). ‘A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Rearrest (STARR): Using Core Correctional Practices in Probation Interactions’. Journal of Crime & Justice 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1990) ‘Probation Can Work: A Research Study using Volunteers’. Australian Journal of Socila Work 43 (2), 13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1994) Effective Supervision of Offenders, PhD Thesis, LaTrobe University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1996) ‘The Impact of Different Supervision Practices in Community Corrections’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 29(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (2000) ‘Social Work Education, Pro-Social Orientation and Effective Probation Practice’. Probation Journal 47, 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (2006) Working with Involuntary Clients. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. J., 2012, Effective community-based supervision of young offenders, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice (P], vol 448, Australian Institute of Criminology, Australia, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2010) ‘The Good Lives Model of Offender Rehabilitation’. in F. McNeil, P. Raynor and C. Trotter (Eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Devon: Willan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Melser, J. and Yates, P. M. (2007). ‘Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: A Theoretical Elaboration and Evaluation’. Aggression and Violent Behavior 12, 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Christopher Trotter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trotter, C. (2013). Effective Supervision of Young Offenders. In: Ugwudike, P., Raynor, P. (eds) What Works in Offender Compliance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137019523_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics