Skip to main content

Robust Consumption and Portfolio Rules When Asset Returns Are Predictable

  • Chapter
Advances in Financial Risk Management
  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

In his seminal contribution, Merton (1971) solved for the dynamic asset allocation of an expected utility maximizer in a continuous time setting and with an infinite horizon. He showed that when the agent derives utility from intermediate consumption, a closed form solution to the consumption/investment problem exists if the economy is affected by a state variable following a mean reverting process and perfectly positively correlated with the traded risky asset. Wachter (2002) showed that a closed form solution exists under finite horizon when the markets are still complete, that is when there is a perfect negative correlation between the traded risky asset and the state variable. In incomplete markets, a closed form solution is known to exist only when the agent derives utility solely from terminal wealth. Kim and Omberg (1996) consider a setting where a state variable following a mean reverting process is imperfectly correlated to the traded risky asset while the agent has utility only from terminal wealth. In this setting, they showed that a closed form solution exists. Recently, Liu (2007) extended the previous findings to the case where asset returns are quadratic in mean reverting state variables. He obtained explicit solutions in complete markets with intermediate consumption and in incomplete markets with only terminal wealth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, E., Hansen, L. P. and Sargent, T. (2003). A Quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk and Model Detection. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (1), 68–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramov, D. (2002). Stock Return Predictability and Model Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 423–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramov, D. (2004). Stock Return Predictability and Asset Pricing Models. The Review of Financial Studies, 17, 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N. (2000). Investing for the Long Run When Returns are Predictable. Journal of Finance 55. 225–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. and Clara, P. S. (2006). Dynamic Portfolio Selection by Augmenting the Asset Space. Journal of Finance, 61. 2187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. and Xia, J. (2002). Dynamic Asset Allocation under Inflation. Journal of Finance, 57 (3), 1201–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and Viceira, L. (1999). Consumption and Portfolio Decisions when Expected Returns Are Time Varying. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 433–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H., Wang, T. and Zhang, H. (2005). Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation and Asset Prices. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 1219–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, A-V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22 (5), 1915–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. and Schneider, M. (2010). Ambiguity and Asset Markets. NBER Working Paper No. 16181.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etner, J., Jeleva, M. and Tallon, J.-M. (2009). Decision Theory under Uncertainty. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne No. 2009.64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., Postlewaite, A. W. and Schmeidler, D. (2008). Probability and Uncertainty in Economic Modeling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 173–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidolin, M. and Rinaldi, F. (2010). Ambiguity in Asset Pricing and Portfolio Choice. Working Paper Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis and Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju, N. and Miao, J. (2012). Ambiguity, Learning and Asset Returns. Econometrica, 80, 559–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. and Omberg, E. (1996). Dynamic Nonmyopic Portfolio Behavior. Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1), 141–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leippold, M., Trojani, F. and Vanini, P. (2008). Learning and Asset Prices under Ambiguous Information. Review of Financial Studies, 21, 2565–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettau, M. and Ludvigson, S. (2001). Consumption, Aggregate Wealth, and Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, LVI (3), 815–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lioui, A., and Poncet, P. (2001). On Optimal Portfolio Choice under Stochastic Interest Rates. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 1141–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2007). Portfolio Selection in Stochastic Environments. Review of Financial Studies, 20, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Pan, J. and Wang, T. (2005). An Equilibrium Model of Rare Event Premia and Its Implication for Option Smirks. Review of Financial Studies, 18 (1), 131–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout, P. (2004). Robust Portfolio Rules and Asset Pricing. Review of Financial Studies, 17 (4), 951–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout, P. (2006). Robust Portfolio Rules and Detection-error Probabilities for a Mean-reverting Risk Premium. Journal of Economic Theory, 128 (1), 136–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1971). Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 373–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangvinatsos, A. and Wachter, J. (2005). Does the Failure of the Expectations Hypothesis Matter for Long Term Investors? Journal of Finance, LX (1), 179–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uppal, R. and Wang, T. (2003). Model Misspecification and Underdiversification. Journal of Finance, 58 (6), 2465–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, J. (2002). Portfolio and Consumption Decisions under Mean Reverting Returns: An Exact Solution for Complete Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, J. and Warusawitharana, M. (2009). Predictable Returns and Asset Allocation: Should a Skeptical Investor Time the Market? Journal of Econometrics, 148, 162–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P. P. (2008). Uncertainty, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Abraham Lioui

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lioui, A. (2013). Robust Consumption and Portfolio Rules When Asset Returns Are Predictable. In: Batten, J.A., MacKay, P., Wagner, N. (eds) Advances in Financial Risk Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025098_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics