Skip to main content

Conclusion

Ironic Freedom and Feminist Postliberalism

  • Chapter
Ironic Freedom
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

My first chapter began with assisted suicide. My last chapter begins with military service. A few days into President Obama’s second term, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced that military women will no longer be barred from serving in combat.2 This change has been greeted as a progressive reform both in the Armed Forces and in the civilian population. However, support has not been unanimous. Some Americans are asking, “Who benefits?” One commentator wrote, “I suspect this has less to do with empowering women or gender equality and more to do with an increasing shortage of male bodies to throw into the quagmires we’ve created … I can’t help thinking that the boys’ club is suddenly happy to ‘allow’ women to serve on the front lines.”3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Elisabeth Bumiller and Todd Shanker, “Pentagon Is Set to Lift Combat Ban for Women,” New York Times, January 24, 2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/24/us/pentagon-says-it-is-lifting-ban-on-women-in-combat.html, accessed January 25, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elisabeth Bumiller and James Dao, “For 3 Women, Combat Option Comes a Bit Late,” New York Times, January 27, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander Meiklejohn, Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People (New York: Harper and Row, 1960), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Minette Walters, The Scold’s Bridle (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), 336–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jo Roman, Exit House (New York: Seaview Books, 1980), 127–28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ben Mattlin, “Suicide by Choice? Not So Fast,” New York Times, October 31, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/opinion/suicide-by-choice-not-so-fast.html?_r=0, accessed November 9, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katha Pollitt, “The Strange Case of Baby M,” The Nation (January 1, 1998). http://www.thenation.com/doc/19870523/19870523 pollitt, accessed November 11, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Margaret Battin, “Legal Physician-assisted Dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence Concerning the Impact on Patients in ‘Vulnerable’ Groups,” Journal of Medical Ethics 33, no. 10 (October 2007): 591–97. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022335; Chapter 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The result was Judith A. Baer, The Chains of Protection: The Judicial Response to Women’s Labor Legislation (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1978), especially chap. 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Respectively, Lisa Blumberg, “Eugenics and Reproductive Choice,” in The Ragged Edge: The Disability Experience from the Pages of the First Fifteen Years of The Disability Rag, ed. Barrett Shaw (Louisville: Advocado Press, 1994), 222;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rayna Rapp, Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America (New York: Routledge, 2000); and

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ayelet Waldman, Bad Mother: A Chronicle of Maternal Crimes, Minor Calamities, and Occasional Moments of Grace (New York: Anchor Books, 2009), 122–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Angela Harris, “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory,” Stanford Law Review 42 (1990): 581–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See Baer, Chains, chap. 5; Serena Mayeri, Reasoning from Race: Feminism, Law, and the Civil Rights Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011), chap. 5 and 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Judith A. Baer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baer, J.A. (2013). Conclusion. In: Ironic Freedom. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031006_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics