Skip to main content

Democracy Promotion, Local Participation, and Transnational Governmentality in Afghanistan

  • Chapter
Democracy at Large

Abstract

Afghanistan—a country evoking images of poverty and mass migration, violence, and religious extremism to a Western audience—may seem a strange place to study the effects of democracy promotion. Yet Afghanistan is the destination of thousands of experts who conceive their endeavor within the framework of a struggle between the values of modernity (democracy, human rights, women’s empowerment, secular education, accountability, to mention but a few), the archaisms of tradition, and the corruption of the state system. Such an international involvement may recall to mind the presence of the Soviets in the 1980s who, in addition to their harsh military occupation, also implemented a development policy consisting of female emancipation, literacy campaigns, and land reform. But, more generally, Afghan history has been shaped recurrently by external actors. Building on the polity that the Pashtun tribes had created during their military advances of the mid-eighteenth century, modern Afghanistan came into being in the second half of the nineteenth century through the action of colonial powers. It is only at that time that the very name of the country was established, when the Russians and the British fixed its frontiers, making it a buffer state between their respective possessions in Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent.1

* This chapter is based on a field research funded by the Agence nationale de la recherche, France. I am grateful to the Program in Agrarian Studies, at Yale University, where I had the opportunity to develop and present my work during the academic year 2008–2009. I am in debt to the people who have provided intellectual support and insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper (in strict alphabetical order): Susanna Fioratta, Yan Greub, Shah M. Hanifi, Karen Hébert, Kay Mansfield, Keely Maxwell, Boris-Mathieu Petric, Laura Sayre, James Scott, K. Sivaramakrishnan, Nandini Sundar, Arundhati Virmani. An expanded version of this text has been first published in Comparative Studies in Society and History 54(3), July 2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • ACTED. Transition Strategy and Cycle 2+ Communities: A Study of NSP. Kabul: Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, Sultan. Mid-Term Evaluation Repor t of the National Solidarity Programme (NSP), Afghanistan. York: Post-War Reconstruction and Development Unit, University of York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindemann, Rolf. Religion und Politik bei den schi’itischen Hazâra in Afghanistan, Iran und Pakistan. Berlin: Ethnizität und Gesellschaft (Occasional Paper 7), 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick, Jennifer. The Political Economy of Customary Organizations in Rural Afghanistan. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Department of Political Science (unpublished manuscript), 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, David B. “The Evolution of Shi’i Political Dissent in Afghanistan,” in Cole, Juan R. I. and Keddie, Nikki R. (eds), Shi’ism and Social Protest. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1986: 201–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James, and Gupta, Akhil. “Spatializing States: Towards an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality,” American Ethnologist, vol. 29, no. 4, 2002: 981–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geokart. National Atlas of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. Warsaw: Geokart, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanifi, Shah Mahmoud. Connecting Histories in Afghanistan. New York: Columbia University Press (www.gutenberg-e.org/hanifi/), 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Thomas Blom, and Stepputat, Finn. “Sovereignty Revisited,” Annual Review of Anthropology 35, 2006: 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpviken, Kristian Berg. Political Mobilization among the Hazara of Afghanistan: 1978–1992. Oslo: Department of Sociology (Rapport 9), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahimi, Niamatullah. At the Sources of Factionalism and Civil War in Hazarajat. London: Crisis States Research Centre (Working Paper 41), 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDLG. Strategic Framework. Kabul: Independent Directorate for Local Governance, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chris. Hazarajat Baseline Study—Interim Report. Islamabad: UN Coordinator’s Office, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Tania Murray. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monsutti, Alessandro. “Cooperation, Remittances, and Kinship among the Hazaras,” Iranian Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, 2004: 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsutti, Alessandro. War and Migration: Social Networks and Economic Strategies of the Hazaras of Afghanistan, New York/London: Routledge, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsutti, Alessandro. “Itinérances transnationales: un éclairage sur les réseaux migratoires afghans,” Critique internationale vol. 44, 2009: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Solidarity Programme. Operational Manual. Kabul: Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Hamish. Subnational State-Building in Afghanistan. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Olivier. L’Afghanistan: Islam et modernité politique. Paris: Seuil, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. “On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange,” in Banton, Michael (ed.), The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock Publications, 1965: 139–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schetter, Conrad. “Ethnoscapes, National Territorialisation, and the Afghan War.” Geopolitics 10, 2005: 50–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Boris Petric

Copyright information

© 2012 Boris Petric

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monsutti, A. (2012). Democracy Promotion, Local Participation, and Transnational Governmentality in Afghanistan. In: Petric, B. (eds) Democracy at Large. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032768_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics