Skip to main content

China, the WTO and the Doha Agenda

  • Chapter
China and the World Economy

Abstract

China’s accession to the WTO involved a dramatic liberalization of trade, and the development and strengthening of trade-related institutions. These reforms were estimated to result in a substantial expansion in China’s trade and in welfare improvements in China and the countries that trade extensively with China (Ianchovichina and Martin, 2004). Since accession, China’s trade growth has been dramatic. Exports quintupled in the following seven years, making China the world’s largest exporter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. E. and Neary, J. P. (2007), Welfare versus Market Access: The Implications of Tariff Structure for Tariff Reform, Journal of International Economics, 71, 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., Martin, W. and van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006), Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What’s at Stake for Developing Countries?, World Bank Economic Review, 20(2), 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. and Jensen, J. (1999), Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?, Journal of International Economics, 47, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clerides, S., Lach, S. and Tybout, J. (1998), Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J. and Martin, W. (2006), Great Expectations: Ex Ante Assessment of the Welfare Impacts of Trade Reforms, Invited paper presented to the 9th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Addis Ababa, June 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994) Protection for Sale, American Economic Review 84(4): 833–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. and Keeney, R. (2006), What Is at Stake: The Relative Importance of Import Barriers, Export Subsidies and Domestic Support, in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, Basingstoke and Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Rozelle, S. and Min, C. (2004), The Nature of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in China and Implications for WTO Accession, in Bhattasali, D., Li, Shantong and Martin, W. (eds) China and the WTO: Accession, Policy Reform and Poverty Reduction, Oxford University Press and the World Bank, Oxford and Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. and Klenow, P. (2005), The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports, American Economic Review, 95(3), 704–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianchovichina, E. and Martin, W. (2004), Economic Impacts of China’s Accession to the World Trade Organization, World Bank Economic Review, 18(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean, S., Laborde, D. and Martin, W. (2006), Consequences of Alternative Formulas for Agricultural Tariff Cuts, in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, Basingstoke and Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean, S., Laborde, D. and Martin, W. (2010), Formulas and Flexibility in Trade Negotiations: Sensitive Agricultural Products in the WTO’s Doha Agenda, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5200, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manole, V. and Martin, W. (2005), Keeping the Devil in the Details: A Feasible Approach to Aggregating Trade Distortions, Paper presented to the European Trade Study Group Conference, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. (2001), Implications of Reform and WTO Accession for China’s Agricultural Policies, Economics of Transition, 9(3), 717–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. (2003), The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polaski, S. (2005), Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2004), LINKAGE Technical Reference Document: Version 6.0, World Bank, Development Prospects Group, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006), Estimating the Benefits: Why Numbers Change, in Newfarmer, R. (ed.) Trade, Development and Doha: A Window into the Issues, World Bank, Washington DC. Downloaded 26 April 2010 from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/239054-1126812419270/4.EstimatingThe.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, F. (2006), Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of Hub and Spoke, Paper presented to the 9th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Addis Ababa, 15–17 June.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Kym Anderson, Will Martin and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, K., Martin, W., van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2010). China, the WTO and the Doha Agenda. In: Greenaway, D., Milner, C., Yao, S. (eds) China and the World Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137059864_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics